INTERLOCK?-35
Report
- Report Number
- 2134265-2013-04534
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- June 27, 2013
- Date of Event
- May 27, 2013
- Report Date
- May 29, 2013
- Manufacturer
- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK
- Product Code
- KRD
- PMA / PMN Number
- K110295
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FR
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
AGE AT TIME OF EVENT: BORN IN (B)(6). (B)(4).
DEVICE EVALUATED BY MFR: THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. A COIL WAS RETURNED PROTRUDING DISTALLY FROM A CATHETER. THE HUB OF THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND THE CATHETER WAS HELD TOGETHER BY A TIE WRAP. THIS WAS REMOVED FOR ANALYSIS. THE COIL WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE PULLED THROUGH THE CATHETER BUT A RESISTANCE WAS MET. THE CATHETER HAD TO BE CUT IN AN ATTEMPT TO RETRIEVE THE COIL. A FIBER BUNDLE FELL OFF DURING THE RETRIEVAL OF THE COIL. THE COIL WAS FOUND TO BE STRETCHED AND SEVERELY KINKED DISTALLY IN THE REGION OF THE INTERLOCKING ARM OF THE COIL. THE COIL WAS ALSO FOUND TO BE KINKED DISTALLY FROM THE PROCEDURE. THE COIL WAS INADVERTENTLY KINKED IN AN ATTEMPT TO REMOVE IT FROM THE CATHETER. A MICROSCOPIC INSPECTION REVEALED THE COIL ZAP TIP SHAPE AND SURFACE WAS SMOOTH. THE INTERLOCKING ARM OF THE MAIN COIL WAS INSPECTED AND NO DAMAGE NOTED. THE MANUFACTURING BATCH RECORD REVIEW CONFIRMED THAT THE DEVICE MET ALL MATERIAL, ASSEMBLY AND PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS. THE MOST PROBABLE ROOT CAUSE IS USER ERROR AS THE DFU STATES: ¿THE INTERLOCK - 35 FIBERED IDC OCCLUSION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO BE DELIVERED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY THROUGH A 5F (1.70 MM) OD (0.035 IN [0.89 MM] OR 0.038 IN [0.97 MM] INNER LUMEN) IMAGER II SELECTIVE DIAGNOSTIC CATHETER WITHOUT SIDE FLUSHING HOLES.¿ ¿THE USE OF OTHER DIAGNOSTIC CATHETERS MAY RESULT IN AN INABILITY TO DELIVER, DEPLOY OR RECAPTURE THE DEVICE.¿ (B)(4).
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A VARICOCELE EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT PROCEDURE, PREMATURE COIL DETACHMENT OCCURRED. THE TARGET LESION IS LOCATED IN THE NON TORTUOUS AND NON CALCIFIED LEFT SPERMATIC VEIN. THREE INTERLOCKING DETACHABLE COILS WERE SELECTED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, 8MM X 20 CM INTERLOCK-35 DETACHABLE COIL WAS DEPLOYED FIRST WITH NO ISSUE. THE SECOND COIL, 8MM X 20 CM INTERLOCK-35 DETACHABLE COIL , WAS THEN MOUNTED TO A NON-BSC MICROCATHETER. THE SECOND COIL INITIALLY FAILED TO DETACH FROM THE INTERLOCKING ARM MECHANISM. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO MANIPULATE THE SYSTEM WITH SUBTLE MOVEMENTS TO DETACH THE COIL FROM THE INTERLOCKING ARM AND IT WAS DEPLOYED SUCCESSFULLY. THEN THE THIRD COIL, 10MM X 40 CM INTERLOCK-35 DETACHABLE COIL WAS INSERTED. WHEN THE COIL WAS ADVANCED THE INTERLOCKING ARMS DETACHED PREVENTING FURTHER PROGRESSION OF THE COIL. THE COIL PROTRUDED OUTSIDE THE MICROCATHETER WITH THE DISTAL COIL IN THE VEIN. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO CUT THE HUB OF THE MICROCATHETER AND MOUNTED A 5FR INTRODUCER SHEATH TO FACILITATE THE REMOVAL OF THE MICROCATHETER TOGETHER WITH THE PROTRUDING COIL. THE COIL WAS REMOVED COMPLETELY FROM THE PATIENT. THE COIL WAS NOT BROKEN OR MIGRATED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S CONDITION IS STABLE.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A VARICOCELE EMBOLIZATION TREATMENT PROCEDURE, PREMATURE COIL DETACHMENT OCCURED. THE TARGET LESION IS LOCATED IN THE NON TORTUOUS AND NON CALCIFIED LEFT SPERMATIC VEIN. THREE INTERLOCKING DETACHABLE COILS WERE SELECTED TO TREAT THE TARGET LESION. DURING THE PROCEDURE, 8MM X 20 CM INTERLOCK-35 DETACHABLE COIL WAS DEPLOYED FIRST WITH NO ISSUE. THE SECOND COIL, 8MM X 20 CM INTERLOCK-35 DETACHABLE COIL , WAS THEN MOUNTED TO A NON-BSC MICROCATHETER. THE SECOND COIL INITIALLY FAILED TO DETACH FROM THE INTERLOCKING ARM MECHANISM. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO MANIPULATE THE SYSTEM WITH SUBTLE MOVEMENTS TO DETACH THE COIL FROM THE INTERLOCKING ARM AND IT WAS DEPLOYED SUCCESSFULLY. THEN THE THIRD COIL, 10MM X 40 CM INTERLOCK-35 DETACHABLE COIL WAS INSERTED. WHEN THE COIL WAS ADVANCED THE INTERLOCKING ARMS DETACHED PREVENTING FURTHER PROGRESSION OF THE COIL. THE COIL PROTRUDED OUTSIDE THE MICROCATHETER WITH THE DISTAL COIL IN THE VEIN. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO CUT THE HUB OF THE MICROCATHETER AND MOUNTED A 5FR INTRODUCER SHEATH TO FACILITATE THE REMOVAL OF THE MICROCATHETER TOGETHER WITH THE PROTRUDING COIL. THE COIL WAS REMOVED COMPLETELY FROM THE PATIENT. THE COIL WAS NOT BROKEN OR MIGRATED. NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AND THE PATIENT'S CONDITION IS STABLE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 294099 | INTERLOCK?-35 | DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION | KRD | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - CORK | M001363610 | 0015488856 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |