FEM-NECKSCR Ø11 SELF-TAP L100 SST
Report
- Report Number
- 8030965-2013-03218
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- June 21, 2013
- Date of Event
- April 27, 2013
- Report Date
- May 23, 2013
- Manufacturer
- SYNTHES GMBH
- Product Code
- HWC
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SZ
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
DEVICE WAS USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. DEVICE IS NOT DISTRIBUTED IN THE UNITED STATES, BUT IS SIMILAR TO DEVICE MARKETED IN THE USA. SUBJECT DEVICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND IS CURRENTLY IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS. INVESTIGATION IS ON GOING; NO CONCLUSION COULD BE DRAWN. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS HAS BEEN REQUESTED.
THIS DEVICE USED FOR TREATMENT AND NOT DIAGNOSIS. BASED ON THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE FRACTURE SURFACES, WE CAN CONCLUDE THAT THE IMPLANTS WERE SUBJECTED TO TWO-SIDED DYNAMIC BENDING AND AXIAL LOADS. GLIDING/WEAR MARKS WERE FOUND ON THE HIP PIN AND FEMORAL NECK SCREW. THEY RESULT FROM MICRO MOVEMENTS OF THE FEMORAL NAIL - PIN/SCREW AND ARE AN INDICATION FOR INSTABILITY AND HIGH DYNAMIC LOADS. CONSTANTLY ALTERNATING BENDING LOADS LED TO THE FATIGUE OF THE MATERIAL, THEN TO A FIRST CRACK AND FINALLY TO THE OVERLOAD RESPECTIVELY TO THE FATIGUE FRACTURE OF THE PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL, THE HIP PIN AND THE LOCKING BOLT. THE IMPLANTS COULD NOT RESIST THE APPLIED FORCE WHICH FINALLY LED TO THE FATIGUE FAILURES. POSTOPERATIVE ACTIVITIES OF THE PATIENT MAY HAVE PLAYED A CERTAIN ROLE, TOO. A FAILURE RESULTING FROM EITHER A MATERIAL DEFECT OR THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS CAN BE EXCLUDED. PLACEHOLDER.
THIS DEVICE USED FOR TREATMENT AND NOT DIAGNOSIS. THE MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS WERE REVIEWED AND NO COMPLAINT RELATED ISSUES WERE FOUND.
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES (B)(4) REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: PATIENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH HARDWARE ON (B)(6) 2011. REPORTEDLY, IN THE PATIENTS LAST CONSULT IN (B)(6) 2013, THE RADIOGRAPHY HAD REVEALED A BROKEN LOCKING BOLT. IT WAS REPORTED THE DOCTOR HAD INFORMED THE PATIENT TO CONTINUE WALKING NORMALLY. IN THE LAST FOUR WEEKS, THE PATIENT FELT PAIN. ANOTHER RADIOGRAPHIC CONTROL WAS TAKEN (DATE UNKNOWN) REVEALED A BROKEN PFN NAIL. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT HE DID NOT NOTICE THE EXACT MOMENT WHEN THE IMPLANT WAS BROKEN. PATIENT WAS RETURNED TO THE O.R. ON (B)(6) 2013 FOR REMOVAL OF HARDWARE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. THIS IS 4 OF 5 REPORTS FOR THE SAME EVENT, COMPLAINT (B)(4).
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 283149 | FEM-NECKSCR Ø11 SELF-TAP L100 SST | HWC | SYNTHES GMBH | 3229188 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 YR |