INTERSTIM II
Report
- Report Number
- 3004209178-2013-10497
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- June 17, 2013
- Report Date
- May 28, 2013
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
- Product Code
- EZW
- PMA / PMN Number
- P970004
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IN, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
CONCOMITANT PRODUCTS: PRODUCT ID 3037, SERIAL # (B)(4), PRODUCT TYPE PROGRAMMER, PATIENT; PRODUCT ID 3889-28, LOT # V358329, IMPLANTED: (B)(6) 2010, PRODUCT TYPE LEAD. (B)(4).
(B)(4).
(B)(4).
(B)(4).
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A PROBLEM WITH THE PATIENT PROGRAMMER. THE BASIC FUNCTIONALITY WAS REVIEWED WITH THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT WAS CURRENTLY ON PROGRAM 1 AT 0.0 V, BUT WAS UNABLE TO CHANGE TO A DIFFERENT PROGRAM. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT DID NOT GET A NEW PATIENT PROGRAMMER. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT¿S PHYSICIAN WAS TRYING TO CHANGE PROGRAMS, BUT WAS UNABLE TO CHANGE PROGRAMS. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO SYNC, TURN STIMULATION ON/OFF, TOGGLE THROUGH ICONS, BUT COULD NOT GET THE BOTTOM ROW TO VIEW OTHER PROGRAMS. IT WAS REVIEWED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WOULD NEED TO USE THE CLINICIAN PROGRAMMER TO ADD THE DESIRED PROGRAMS, AS EITHER THEY DID NOT EXIST OR HAD NOT BEEN SET UP.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE PATIENT STILL HAD CONCERNS REGARDING HER DEVICE OR THERAPY BUT WAS WORKING WITH HER DOCTOR OR MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE. IT WAS NOTED THE PATIENT HAD AN APPOINTMENT (B)(6). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED WHEN INITIAL PROGRAMMING WAS DONE AT THE TIME OF IMPLANT ONLY ¿PROGRAM 1¿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¿MINOR INCONVENIENCE¿ FOR THE PATIENT AND HER PHYSICIAN.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROGRAMMER WAS NOT COMING ON. THEN THE PATIENT WAS ABLE TO GET THE PROGRAMMER TO WORK.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER (HCP) REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A FOLLOW-UP VISIT ON (B)(6) 2014. THE PATIENT WAS DOING WELL WITH THE DEVICE, WAS VERY PLEASED, AND JUST TOOK SOLIFENACIN SUCCINATE IF GOING OUT. THE BUTTOCKS INCISION WAS GREAT AND THE BATTERY WAS NOT FELT BY THE PATIENT. SOME PALPATION WAS ABLE ON THE ELECTRODE CONNECTOR, BUT IT WAS NOT UNCOMFORTABLE FOR THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT HAD IMPROVED BLADDER QUIETING WITH THE REPROGRAMMING OF THE DEVICE. THE PATIENT WOULD RETURN TO THE HCP'S OFFICE IN 6 MONTHS. THE INDICATION FOR USE FOR THIS PATIENT WAS URINARY DYSFUNCTION/SACRAL NERVE STIMULATION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 274113 | INTERSTIM II | STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE | EZW | MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO | 3058 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 00066 YR |