INFUSE BONE GRAFT
Report
- Report Number
- 1030489-2013-02048
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- June 3, 2013
- Report Date
- May 3, 2013
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC
- Product Code
- NEK
- PMA / PMN Number
- P000058
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- ATTORNEY
Narratives
(B)(6). (B)(4). NEITHER THE DEVICE NOR FILMS OF APPLICABLE IMAGING STUDIES WERE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION. THEREFORE, WE ARE UNABLE TO DETERMINE THE DEFINITIVE CAUSE OF THE REPORTED EVENT. PRODUCTS FROM MULTIPLE MANUFACTURERS WERE IMPLANTED DURING THE PROCEDURE. ALTHOUGH IT IS UNKNOWN IF ANY OF THE DEVICES CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT, WE ARE FILING THIS MDR FOR NOTIFICATION PURPOSES.
(B)(6) 2006 ¿ PT PRESENTED TO SURGERY WITH STENOSIS WITH INSTABILITY LEADING TO CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN AND LUMBAR RADICULAR PAIN. PROCEDURE WAS FOR REMOVAL OF POSTERIOR SEGMENTAL SPINAL INSTRUMENTATION. EXPLORATION OF SPINAL FUSION. REDO POSTERIOR LUMBAR FUSION/FIXATION. L3 LAMINECTOMY. BILATERAL L3-L4 FORAMINOTOMIES. POSTERIOR ARTHRODESIS USING BMP AND MASTERGRAFT GRANULES AS WELL AS AUTOLOGOUS BONE GRAFT. BMP WAS PLACED IN THE LATERAL GUTTERS PACKED WITH MASTERGRAFT GRANULES, THEN SUPPLEMENTED WITH AUTOGRAFT BONE. (B)(6) 2006 ¿ PT PRESENTED TO SURGERY WITH RIGHT L5 RADICULOPATHY WITH MOTOR WEAKNESS OF THE RIGHT FOOT. PRE-OPERATIVE CT SCAN WAS TAKEN ¿THAT APPEARED TO SHOW THE L5 PEDICLE SCREW WITHIN THE SPINAL CANAL; HOWEVER, THIS WAS NOT CONFIRMED DURING THE OPERATIVE PROCEDURE, AND, INSTEAD, DURING PROBING OF THE PEDICLE, NO BONY BREACH WAS PALPABLE OR DISCOVERED.¿ PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS ¿EXPOSURE OF A PREVIOUS RIGHT FUSION/INSTRUMENTATION SITE WITH REMOVAL OF THE L5 PEDICLE SCREW. REPLACEMENT OF THE L3-L4 ROD AND FUSION OF THE L3-L4 AREA. REINFORCEMENT OF A BONY FUSION/POSTERIOR ARTHRODESIS FROM L3 TO L4 USING BMP (BONE MORPHOGENIC PROTEIN) AS WELL AS MASTERGRAFT.¿ ¿UPON INSPECTION, THE PROBING CERTAINLY DID NOT APPEAR TO REVEAL BONY BREACH. IN FACT, ALL WALLS OF THE PEDICLE SCREW HOLE APPEARED TO BE COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY BONE, AND NO EVIDENCE OF BREACH WAS OBSERVED. THE CT SCAN WAS THEN RE-EVALUATED, AND, AGAIN, THE PREOPERATIVE CT SCAN SHOWED THE L5 PEDICLE SCREW IN THE CANAL; THAT MAY HAVE BEEN CONTRIBUTING TO THE PATIENT'S PRE-OPERATIVE SYMPTOMS OF A RIGHT L5 RADICULOPATHY AND, THEREFORE, BECAUSE OF THE PATIENT'S CLINICAL SYMPTOMATOLOGY, THE L5 PEDICLE SCREW WAS REMOVED AND NOT REPLACED.¿ ¿THE PREVIOUS BMP AND MASTERGRAFT GRANULES APPEARED TO BE WELLIN PLACE. THESE AREAS WERE REINFORCED WITH NEW BMP WITH MASTERGRAFT GRANULES AND PARTICULARLY REINFORCED AT THE L4-L5 AND L5-S1 LEVELS.¿ (B)(6) 2007 ¿ PT. PRESENTS FOR SURGERY WITH COMPLAINTS OF BACK PAIN WITH BILATERAL KNEE PAIN. ¿PATIENT NOTES THE ONSET OF SYMPTOMS AFTER MOVING IN HER SEAT AND SUDDENLY HAVING LOW BACK PAIN.¿ PT. UNDERWENT PROCEDURE FOR ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION L2-L3 ANDL3-L4 USING COUGAR CAGES AND BMP, AND REMOVAL OF POSTERIOR LUMBAR HARDWARE, REPLACEMENT WITH XSTOP, L2 TO L4, AND FUSION USING BMP.BMP WAS PLACED INSIDE THE INTERBODY CAGES AND ROLLED OVER MASTERGRAFT AND PLACED INTO THE LATERAL GUTTERS. (B)(6) 2012 ¿ PT. PRESENTS FOR FOLLOW-UP WITH ¿LOW BACK AND CHRONIC LOWER EXTREMITY PAIN AND NUMBNESS SECONDARY TO LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS.¿ (B)(6) 2012 ¿ PT. PRESENTS FOR FOLLOW-UP WITH ¿PERSISTENT UPPER, MID AND LOW BACK PAIN SECONDARY TO LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS.¿ (B)(6) 2013 ¿ PT PRESENTS FOR FOLLOW-UP WITH CHRONIC BACK PAIN AND SPINAL STENOSIS.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 244062 | INFUSE BONE GRAFT | FILLER, RECOMBINANT HUMAN BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN, COLLAGEN SCAFFOLD WITH MET | NEK | MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC | NA | M110607AAD |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |