PFNA Ø10 LONG LE 130° L380 SST
Report
- Report Number
- 8030965-2013-02344
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 24, 2013
- Date of Event
- February 22, 2013
- Report Date
- April 27, 2013
- Manufacturer
- SYNTHES GMBH
- Product Code
- HSB
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SZ
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
DEVICE IS USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS.
DEVICE WAS USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. DEVICE IS NOT DISTRIBUTED IN THE UNITED STATES, BUT IS SIMILAR TO A DEVICE MARKETED IN THE USA. THE MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS WERE REVIEWED AND NO COMPLAINT RELATED ISSUES WERE FOUND. SUBJECT DEVICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND IS CURRENTLY IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS. INVESTIGATION IS ON GOING; NO CONCLUSION COULD BE DRAWN.
THIS DEVICE WAS USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE: THE RESULTS OF THE ADDITIONAL EVALUATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE EXAMINATION OF THE RAW-MATERIAL INSPECTION SHEET AND THE MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS SHOWED NO DEVIATION IN RELATION TO THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, MICROSTRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES. THE MATERIAL IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS. THE DIMENSIONS WERE FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL DRAWING AND AO/ASIF SPECIFICATION. BASED ON THE TOPOGRAPHY OF THE FRACTURE SURFACE, WE CAN CONCLUDE THAT THE IMPLANT WAS SUBJECTED TO DYNAMIC BENDING TORSIONAL LOADS. CONSTANTLY ALTERNATING BENDING LOADS LED TO THE FATIGUE OF THE MATERIAL, THEN TO A FIRST CRACK AND FINALLY TO THE OVERLOAD RESPECTIVELY TO THE FATIGUE FRACTURE. THE NAIL COULD NOT RESIST THE APPLIED FORCE WHICH FINALLY LED TO THE FATIGUE FAILURE. A FAILURE RESULTING FROM EITHER A MATERIAL DEFECT OR THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS CAN BE EXCLUDED. DATE OF EVENT WAS INCORRECTLY REPORTED ON INITIAL. DATE OF EVENT IS UNKNOWN (B)(4).
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES (B)(6) REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: A PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL A (PFNA) IMPLANTED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE IN (B)(6) 2012 NEEDED TO BE TAKEN OUT DUE TO SNAPPED PROSTHESIS. THE PFNA HAD COMPLETELY SNAPPED AT THE POINT OF THE BLADE. X-RAYS LOOKED LIKE THE BONE WAS NOT REDUCED PROPERLY ON FIRST IMPLANT AND SO THE DEVICE BECAME LOAD BEARING. THE REVISION TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2013. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WERE MARKS ON THE PFNA BLADE THAT MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY INCORRECT INSERTION OF THE BLADE. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 2 FOR (B)(4).
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 232453 | PFNA Ø10 LONG LE 130° L380 SST | HSB | SYNTHES GMBH | 7954361 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63 YR | Required Intervention |