FDA Adverse Event Malfunction Summary report: N

SYNCHROMED II

MDR report key: 3115641 · Received May 16, 2013

Report

Report Number
3007566237-2013-01642
Event Type
Malfunction
Date Received
May 16, 2013
Date of Event
April 19, 2013
Report Date
July 15, 2013
Manufacturer
MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO
Product Code
LKK
PMA / PMN Number
P860004
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
MN, US
Reporter Occupation
OTHER

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

CONCOMITANT PRODUCT: PRODUCT ID 8709, SERIAL# UNKNOWN, IMPLANTED: UNKNOWN, PRODUCT TYPE CATHETER. (B)(4).

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

CONCOMITANT PRODUCTS: PRODUCT ID 8578, SERIAL# (B)(4), IMPLANTED: (B)(6) 2013, EXPLANTED: (B)(6) 2013, PRODUCT TYPE ACCESSORY; PRODUCT ID 8709, SERIAL# (B)(4), IMPLANTED: (B)(6) 2004, EXPLANTED: (B)(6) 2013, PRODUCT TYPE CATHETER. (B)(4).

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PUMP REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL WAS UNABLE TO ASPIRATE FROM THE CATHETER WITH A 25 GAUGE NEEDLE AND A TUBERCULIN SYRINGE WHILE THE CATHETER WAS DISCONNECTED FROM THE PUMP. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD BEEN GETTING GOOD THERAPY PRIOR TO THE SURGERY. THE DRUG IN THE PUMP WAS UNKNOWN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED, BUT WAS NOT AVAILABLE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS REPORT.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

THIS EVENT WAS ALSO REPORTED UNDER MANUFACTURER REPORT #3004209178-2013-11125 [IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOLLOWING A PUMP REPLACEMENT SURGERY (REFER TO MANUFACTURER REPORT # 6000030-2013-00171), DURING WHICH TIME THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER (HCP) HAD TROUBLE ASPIRATING FROM THE CATHETER, THE HCP PUT THE PATIENT ON HALF THE DRUG DOSE IN THE NEW PUMP. A FEW DAYS LATER THE PATIENT RETURNED WITH WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS AND THE HCP ENDED UP REPLACING THE CATHETER ¿A FEW WEEKS AGO¿. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS ¿OKAY¿ NOW.]. ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED WILL BE REPORTED UNDER THIS MANUFACTURER REPORT NUMBER (#3007566237-2013-01642). IT WAS LATER CLARIFIED THAT THE SURGERY ON THE PUMP WITH UNSUCCESSFUL CATHETER ASPIRATION AND PATIENT NOT POSITIONED FOR CATHETER REVISION IN MANUFACTURER REPORT 6000030-2013-00171 OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2013. THE PATIENT ¿WAS MISERABLE¿ WHEN SHE WENT IN TO SEE THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) ON (B)(6) 2013. SHE HAS NAUSEA AND VOMITING, WAS DEHYDRATED, IT WAS NOTED ¿ALL THE SYMPTOMS THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT TO SEE FROM WITHDRAWAL.¿ THE HCP INCREASED THE INFUSION RATE, NOTING ¿IT VIRTUALLY DID NO BETTER AT ALL.¿ THE PATIENT WAS SEEN AGAIN BY THE HCP ON (B)(6) 2013 AND ¿ACTUALLY THOUGHT SHE WAS BETTER BUT REALLY SHE WAS NOT¿ SO ¿ULTIMATELY¿ THE HCP TOOK HER BACK TO THE OPERATING ROOM AND REPLACED THE CATHETER ON (B)(6) 2013. IT WAS NOTED THAT PRIOR TO THE (B)(6) 2013 PUMP REMOVAL THE PATIENT WAS TAKING ¿AROUND¿ 6.65MG OR MORPHINE A DAY AND AFTER THE CATHETER WAS REPLACED ON (B)(6) 2013 THE INFUSION RATE WAS 0.125 MG OF MORPHINE AND 0.325 MG OF BUPIVACAINE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS ¿BACK TO HER OLD SELF, WAS ¿DOING VERY WELL.¿ IT WAS STATED THAT IT APPEARED THAT THE CATHETER WAS OBSTRUCTED BUT IT WAS NOT DUE TO ANY KIND OF GRANULOMA.¿ THE HCP COULD NOT EXPLAIN WHY IT HAPPENED, BUT NOTED ONCE THE NEW CATHETER IN, THEY WERE ABLE TO TREAT THE PATIENT ¿AT ON TWENTIETH OF THE DOSE,¿ SO IT WAS SUSPECTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS DELIVERING THE DRUG EITHER SUBDURALLY BUT SHE WAS JUST NOT GETTING THE DRUG INTO THE SUBARACHNOID SPACE¿ IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT SINCE THE HCP HAD NOT PUT THE ORIGINAL PUMP AND CATHETER IN HE ¿COULD NOT TELL.¿ IT WAS THEN STATED THAT THE CURRENT SYSTEM WAS DOING ¿WELL¿ AND THE PATIENT WAS ¿DELIGHTED WITH THE RESULTS.¿

Description of Event or Problem · 1

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER ENDED UP GIVING HALF THE DOSE OF DRUG AND SENT THE PATIENT HOME. THE ISSUE WAS RESOLVED AND THE PATIENT WAS REPORTEDLY ¿FINE¿.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE REPORTER DIDNOT KNOW THE PATIENT¿S NAME, AS HE HEARD ABOUT THE EVENT ¿IN PASSING.¿ THE CATHETER WAS REVISED AND HE HEARD THAT THE PATIENT DID NOT HAVE FURTHER ISSUES. THE REPORTER ATTEMPTED TO CALL THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER¿S OFFICE TO GET FURTHER INFORMATION BUT WAS UNABLE TOFIND OUT WHO THE PATIENT WAS.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
217171 SYNCHROMED II PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE LKK MDT PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO 8637-20

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 00057 YR Required Intervention