LIGACLIP** ENDOSCOPIC CLIP APPLIER
Report
- Report Number
- 3005075853-2013-02320
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- May 14, 2013
- Date of Event
- April 9, 2013
- Report Date
- April 19, 2013
- Manufacturer
- ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
- Product Code
- FZP
- PMA / PMN Number
- K864102
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
(B)(4). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: WHICH FIRING OF THE DEVICE DID THIS EVENT OCCUR ON? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WHAT VESSEL OR STRUCTURE WAS THE DEVICE FIRED ON AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WAS THE CLIP FULLY ADVANCED INTO THE JAWS PRIOR TO FIRING? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WERE THERE ANY FEEDING ISSUES EXPERIENCED WITH THE DEVICE? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WAS THE SURGEON ABLE TO VISUALIZE A CLIP FED INTO THE JAWS PRIOR TO FIRING THE DEVICE? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WAS THERE ANY TORQUING OR TWISTING OF THE DEVICE PRESENT AT THE TIME OF FIRING? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WAS ANY UNEXPECTED RESISTANCE FELT WHILE FIRING THE TRIGGER? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WERE ANY UNEXPECTED NOISES HEARD? IF SO, WHEN? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. DID ANYTHING UNEXPECTED HAPPEN PRIOR TO THIS INCIDENT? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WAS THE DEVICE FIRED AFTER THIS INCIDENT IN OR OUT OF THE PATIENT? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. WHAT WERE THE INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY? WHAT WAS FOUND? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. DOES THE PATIENT HAVE ANY RELEVANT HISTORY OF SURGICAL TREATMENTS? IF SO, WHAT? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. DID SOMEBODY OTHER THAN THE PRIMARY SURGEON FIRE THE INSTRUMENT? IF SO, WHOM? NOT SURE WAS NOT IN CASE. THE ANALYSIS RESULTS FOUND THAT THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED IN GOOD VISUAL CONDITION WITH THE JAWS PROPERLY ALIGNED. UPON CYCLING THE DEVICE, IT WAS NOTED TO BE EMPTY AND LOCKED OUT. THE DEVICE IS DESIGNED TO LOCK OUT WHEN ALL THE CLIPS HAVE BEEN FIRED. DUE TO THE CONDITION OF THE DEVICE, NO FUNCTIONAL TESTING COULD BE PERFORMED TO EVALUATE THE INCIDENT REPORTED. NO CONCLUSION COULD BE REACHED AS TO WHAT MAY HAVE CAUSED THE EVENT REPORTED. THE BATCH RECORD WAS REVIEWED AND NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED DURING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY PROCEDURE, THE LARGE CLIP DID NOT SEEM TO CLOSE TIGHTLY ON THE VESSEL AND THE CLIP WOULD FALL OFF OF THE VESSEL. THE ACCOUNT DID NOT STATE THAT THE CLIP WAS MALFORMED, BUT THAT IT DID NOT SEEM TO CLOSE TIGHTLY ON THE VESSEL. A SECOND DEVICE WAS OPENED AND THE CASE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCES. THIS WAS ALL THE INFORMATION PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 212934 | LIGACLIP** ENDOSCOPIC CLIP APPLIER | CLIP, IMPLANTABLE | FZP | ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. | NA | K4CD40 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |