OT ULTRA2 METER
Report
- Report Number
- 3008382007-2013-11339
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 13, 2013
- Date of Event
- April 18, 2013
- Report Date
- April 18, 2013
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN EUROPE, A DIVISION OF CILAG GMBH INTL
- Product Code
- NBW
- PMA / PMN Number
- K053529
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- PA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
THE METER INVOLVED WITH THIS COMPLAINT HAS BEEN RETURNED BUT NOT YET EVALUATED BY LIFESCAN PRODUCT ANALYSIS. LFS WILL EVALUATE IT AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT.
(B)(4): THE METER PASSED TESTING, NO FAULTS WERE FOUND, AND THE METER FUNCTIONED PROPERLY. A DHR (DEVICE HISTORY RECORD) WAS COMPLETED FOR THIS PRODUCT AND NO DEVIATIONS, NON-CONFORMANCES, OR REWORKS WERE OBSERVED. THE TEST STRIPS PASSED TESTING WITH NO FAULTS FOUND.IF LIFESCAN OBTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS COMPLAINT, A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, LIFESCAN CONSIDERS THIS MATTER CLOSED.
ON (B)(6) 2013, A REPORTER FOR THE LAY USER/ PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) ALLEGING THE PATIENT'S ONETOUCH ULTRA2 METER READ INACCURATELY HIGH COMPARED TO ANOTHER DEVICE. THE MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE SPECIALIST (MSS) WAS UNABLE TO REACH THE LAY USER/PATIENT FOR FOLLOW-UP QUESTIONS. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA) DOCUMENTATION. THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN ON (B)(6) 2013, ABOUT 130AM. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT OBTAINED A BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULT OF "98 MG/DL" WITH THE SUBJECT METER AND "38 MG/DL" ON ANOTHER METER, PERFORMED WITHIN 30 MINUTES OF EACH OTHER. BASED ON STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, THE CALCULATED DIFFERENCE OF THESE GLUCOSE RESULTS EXCEEDS THE EXPECTED VALUE OF <= 30% AND/OR <= 30 MG/DL. THE PATIENT MANAGES HIS DIABETES WITH INSULIN (TYPE/ AMOUNT NOT SPECIFIED). IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE PATIENT MADE CHANGES TO HIS USUAL MANAGEMENT ROUTINE. THE REPORTER DENIED THE PATIENT DEVELOPED SYMPTOMS AT THAT TIME. ON THE EVENING BEFORE THE START OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE, ON (B)(6) 2013, AT 11PM, THE REPORTER ALLEGED THE PATIENT WENT TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM (ER) AND WAS ADMINISTERED INTRAVENOUS (IV) GLUCOSE. BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULTS OR SYMPTOMS WERE NOT SPECIFIED AT THAT TIME. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CCA NOTED THE SUBJECT METER WAS SET TO THE CORRECT UNIT OF MEASUREMENT AND AN APPROVED SAMPLE SITE WAS USED FOR TESTING. THE PATIENT DID NOT HAVE CONTROL SOLUTION TO PERFORM QUALITY CONTROL TESTING. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY OBTAINED A BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULT WITH ANOTHER METER SUGGESTIVE OF A SERIOUS INJURY AFTER THE ALLEGED METER ISSUE BEGAN.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210886 | OT ULTRA2 METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN EUROPE, A DIVISION OF CILAG GMBH INTL | 3442995 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68 YR | Life Threatening |