WALLFLEX ¿ DUODENAL
Report
- Report Number
- 3005099803-2013-03350
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 9, 2013
- Report Date
- April 15, 2013
- Manufacturer
- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
- Product Code
- MUM
- PMA / PMN Number
- K062750
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- BE
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
ALTHOUGH THE EXACT PATIENT AGE WAS NOT PROVIDED, THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE OVER 18 YEARS OF AGE. THE COMPLAINANT INDICATED THAT THE DEVICE HAS BEEN DISPOSED AND WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION; THEREFORE A FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. IF ANY FURTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION IS IDENTIFIED, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED.
NOTE: THIS REPORT PERTAINS TO ONE OF TWO COMPLAINTS. REFER TO MANUFACTURER REPORT # 3005099803-2013-03350 FOR THE OTHER ASSOCIATED DEVICE INFORMATION. IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT A WALLFLEX ENTERAL COLONIC STENT AND A WALLFLEX ENTERAL DUODENAL STENT WERE USED DURING A STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2013. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE INDICATION FOR THE STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE WAS AS A BRIDGE TO SURGERY FOR A BENIGN TUMOR WITHIN THE DESCENDING COLON. THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS NOT TORTUROUS. DURING THE PROCEDURE, WHEN TRYING TO DEPLOY THE WALLFLEX ENTERAL COLONIC STENT (THE SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT), RESISTANCE WAS FELT WHEN TRYING TO DEPLOY THE LAST 2CMS OF THE STENT AND THE WHITE HANDLE DETACHED. THEY TRIED TO DEPLOY THE STENT WITH DIFFERENT METHODS AND THE STENT EVENTUALLY DEPLOYED, BUT DUE TO MANIPULATION IT WAS PLACED TOO FAR PROXIMAL FROM THE LESION. A WALLFLEX ENTERAL DUODENAL STENT DEVICE (THE SUBJECT OF MFR. REPORT # 3005099803-2013-03350) WAS THEN PLACED WITHIN THE WALLFLEX ENTERAL COLONIC STENT WITHOUT ANY ISSUE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE WEEKEND FOLLOWING THE PLACEMENT OF THE STENTS, THE WALLFLEX ENTERAL DUODENAL STENT STARTED PUSHING ON THE WALLFLEX ENTERAL COLONIC STENT AND CAUSED A MICRO-PERFORATION. IN THE PHYSICIAN'S ASSESSMENT, IT WAS UNABLE TO BE DETERMINED WHICH STENT CAUSED THE PERFORATION. AS THE STENTS WERE INITIALLY PLACED AS A BRIDGE TO SURGERY, THE PLANNED SURGERY FOR THE PATIENT WAS EXPEDITED AND BOTH STENTS WERE REMOVED. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE POST SURGERY.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 204574 | WALLFLEX ¿ DUODENAL | STENT,METALLIC,EXPANDABLE,DUODENAL | MUM | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY | M00565030 | 15648481 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |