PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2013-02792
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 6, 2013
- Date of Event
- April 15, 2013
- Report Date
- April 15, 2013
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- MY
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PERCLOSE PROGLIDE DEVICES HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED IN THE FOLLOWING PATIENT POPULATIONS: PATIENTS WITH FEMORAL ARTERY CALCIUM WHICH IS FLUOROSCOPICALLY VISIBLE AT THE ACCESS SITE. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE OTHER PROGLIDE DEVICE REFERENCED IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH MFR NUMBER.
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. THE REPORTED EVENT WAS NOT CONFIRMED. ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE REVEALED THE MARKER TUBE AND PORT APPEARED NORMAL AND WAS NOT OCCLUDED. MARKING PATENCY WAS PERFORMED AND THE DEVICE WAS FOUND NOT PATENT. THE GUIDE TUBE WAS PEELED AND CLOTTED BLOOD WAS FOUND AT THE DISTAL END OF THE MARKER LUMEN. AFTER THE CLOTTED BLOOD WAS REMOVED, MARKING PATENCY WAS PERFORMED AND THE DEVICE WAS PATENT. BASED ON VISUAL AND FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD REVEALED NO NON-CONFORMANCES THAT WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. RESULTS OF THE QUERY OF SIMILAR INCIDENTS IN THE COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE FROM THIS LOT DID NOT INDICATE A MANUFACTURING ISSUE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REVIEWED, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE MILDLY CALCIFIED RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY WAS ATTEMPTED USING A PROGLIDE AFTER A PERIPHERAL INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, DURING FLUSHING OF THE DEVICE AT THE MARKER LUMEN, NO SALINE WAS COMING OUT OF THE MARKER PORT. A SECOND PROGLIDE WAS USED AND A CUFF MISS OCCURRED. MANUAL ARTERIAL COMPRESSION WAS APPLIED TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. THE PHYSICIAN IS REPORTED TO BE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE ENTIRE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 196933 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 30125J1 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 71 YR | Required Intervention | SHEATH: 6F |