PULSE GEN MODEL 103
Report
- Report Number
- 1644487-2013-01189
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- May 3, 2013
- Date of Event
- April 5, 2013
- Report Date
- April 5, 2013
- Manufacturer
- CYBERONICS, INC.
- Product Code
- LYJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- P970003
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
DEVICE MALFUNCTION OCCURRED BUT DID NOT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO A DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY.
REVIEW OF PROGRAMMING HISTORY.
THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED DUE INSERTION DIFFICULTIES. THE INSERTION DIFFICULTY WAS DUPLICATED IN THE LAB. THE IN-LINE CAVITY GO GAGE OR BENCH TEST LEADS WOULD NOT INSERT INTO THE NEGATIVE CONNECTOR BLOCK. THE INSERTION FAILURE WAS DUE TO THE CONNECTOR BLOCK NOT BEING FULLY INSERTED PAST THE RETENTION RAMP IN THE HEADER WHICH SECURES THE CONNECTOR BLOCK IN PLACE. RESULTS OF DIAGNOSTIC TESTING INDICATED THE DEVICE WAS OPERATING PROPERLY AND COMMUNICATED PROPERLY. ELECTRICAL TEST RESULTS SHOWED THAT THE PULSE GENERATOR PERFORMED ACCORDING TO FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATIONS. A CAUSE FOR THE 'CONNECTOR BLOCK POSITION' ISSUE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. A DEVICE HISTORY REVIEW WAS PERFORMED PRIOR TO DISTRIBUTION OF THIS GENERATOR AND ALL ITEMS PASSED PRIOR TO DISTRIBUTION.
ON (B)(6) 2013, IT WAS REPORTED THAT A SURGEON HAD INTRAOPERATIVE PROBLEMS WITH INSERTING THE LEAD INTO A NEW GENERATOR. HE TRIED TO INSERT THE LEAD INTO THE OLD GENERATOR WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS. SYSTEM DIAGNOSTICS WERE OK. HIGH IMPEDANCE WAS NOTED WITH THE NEW GENERATOR; HOWEVER, IMPEDANCE WAS OK WITH THE OLD GENERATOR. THE GENERATOR WAS RETURNED AND IS UNDERGOING PRODUCT ANALYSIS.
REVIEW OF PROGRAMMING HISTORY FROM THE DATE OF SURGERY SHOWS THAT THE SUSPECT MEDICAL DEVICE WAS NEVER PROGRAMMED ON. SYSTEM AND GENERATOR DIAGNOSTICS WERE RUN. THE GENERATOR DIAGNOSTIC YIELDED NORMAL LIMITS, AND THE SYSTEM DIAGNOSTICS ALL YIELDED HIGH IMPEDANCE RESULTS. ADDITIONAL FOLLOW-UP SHOWED THAT THERE WAS NO DAMAGE NOTED ON THE GENERATOR OR THE GENERATOR PACKAGING. THERE WAS NO EXCESSIVE FORCE USED ON THE GENERATOR OR ANY PART OF THE SYSTEM. ANALYSIS OF THE ORIGINALLY EXPLANTED GENERATOR SHOWED THAT THERE WERE NO ADVERSE FUNCTIONAL, MECHANICAL, OR VISUAL ISSUES IDENTIFIED WITH THE RETURNED GENERATOR.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 193830 | PULSE GEN MODEL 103 | GENERATOR | LYJ | CYBERONICS, INC. | 103 | 202093 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 YR |