INRATIO
Report
- Report Number
- 2027969-2013-00329
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- April 23, 2013
- Date of Event
- April 8, 2013
- Report Date
- April 22, 2013
- Manufacturer
- ALERE SAN DEIGO, INC.
- Product Code
- GJS
- PMA / PMN Number
- K092987
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- US
- Reporter Occupation
- NOT APPLICABLE
Narratives
PER ISSUE, CUSTOMER ALWAYS TAKES OVER 15 SECONDS TO APPLY SAMPLE AND MILKS FINGER. ON THE (B)(6) 2013 COMPARISON, CUSTOMER USED THE SAME FINGERSTICK SITE. THESE TECHNIQUE ISSUES MAY CONTRIBUTE TO UNEXPECTED INR RESULTS OR ERRORS IN TESTING. PT CHANGED DOSAGE ON (B)(6) 2013 AFTER INRATIO RESULT WAS OBTAINED. THIS CHANGE IN MEDICATION CANNOT BE RULED OUT AS A CAUSE FOR THE UNEXPECTED RESULT. DISCREPANT RESULTS (ACCURACY) COMPARISON OF INRATIO TEST WITH LAB RESULTS PROVIDED BY END-USER AT TIME COMPLAINT WAS FILED: DATE: (B)(6) 2013, INRATIO METER = 1.0, REFERENCE = 5.0, MEAN = 3.45; CONFIDENCE LIMITS = 2.0 - 5.0. DATE: (B)(6) 2013, INRATIO METER = 1.5, REFERENCE = 2.7, MEAN = 2.10; CONFIDENCE LIMITS = 1-3 - 2.7. THE MEAN OF THE INRATIO METER AND COMPARATIVE SYSTEM INR WERE CALCULATED. FOR A, THE INRATIO REFERENCE VALUES FALL OUTSIDE THE LIMITS, SO THE CRITERIAL ARE NOT MET AND THE VALUES ARE DISCREPANT BEYOND THE DOCUMENTED VARIABILITY FOR PT/INR TESTING. THIS WOULD BE SUBJECT TO STRIP ACCURACY TESTING AS PART OF THE COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION. IN-HOUSE THERAPEUTIC DONOR TESTING PERFORMED ON REPORTED LOT 294799 ON (B)(4) 2013. RESULTS AS FOLLOWS: DONOR (B)(6): INRATIO: 3.8, 3.8, 3.4, REFERENCE: 3.38, BIAS THRESHOLD: 2.38 - 4.38; %CV: 6.30. DONOR (B)(6): INRATIO: 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, REFERENCE: 2.62, BIAS THRESHOLD: 1.62 - 3.62; %CV: 4.00. ALL REPLICATES FOR EACH DONOR ARE WITHIN THE ACCEPTABLE BIAS FOR ACCURACY. PRODUCT PERFORMED AS EXPECTED. BOTH DONORS PRODUCED %CV LESS THAN 16%. PRECISION CRITERIA HAD BEEN MET. NO FURTHER INVESTIGATION IS NECESSARY. ANALYSIS OF THE CLIENT'S DATA FROM INRATIO AND REFERENCE TESTS REVEALED THAT THE TEST RESULT COMPARISON DID NOT MEET ACCURACY CRITERIA. NO PRODUCT WAS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED SO RETAIN PRODUCTS WERE USED FOR INVESTIGATION TESTING. RETAIN STRIP TESTING RESULTS MET ACCURACY AND PRECISION CRITERIA. IMPROPER TECHNIQUES WERE IDENTIFIED IN THE COMPLAINT. THESE COULD NOT BE RULED OUT AS A CAUSE OF THE UNEXPECTED RESULTS. (B)(4). DUE TO THIS LOW OCCURRENCE RATE, BELOW THE ACTION THRESHOLD OF >0.07%, CORRECTIVE ACTION IS NOT REQUIRED AT THIS TIME.
CALLER ALLEGED DISCREPANT RESULTS COMPARED WITH LAB. RESULTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: DATE: (B)(6) 2013, INRATIO: 1.0; LAB: 5.9. DATE: (B)(6) 2013, INRATIO: 1.5; LAB: 2.7. THERAPEUTIC RANGE: 2.5-3.5. TIME: 2-3 HOURS BETWEEN TESTS. AFTER THE READING ON (B)(6) 2013, THE PT TOOK 2.5 MG MORE THAN THE PRESCRIBED DOSE. THE PT MADE THIS DOSE ADJUSTMENT THEMSELVES, NO UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A PHYSICIAN. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 174769 | INRATIO | PROTHROMBIN TIME TEST | GJS | ALERE SAN DEIGO, INC. | 100071 | 294977 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | MUCINEX| AUGMENTIN| EAR DROPS| COUMADIN| TYLENOL |