SMALL UNIVERSAL CHUCK WITH T-HANDLE
Report
- Report Number
- 8030965-2013-10961
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- April 23, 2013
- Date of Event
- October 14, 2011
- Report Date
- October 14, 2011
- Manufacturer
- SYNTHES GMBH
- Product Code
- LXH
- PMA / PMN Number
- EXEMPT
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT AS A RESULT OF REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO FDA WARNING LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 2012. DEVICE(S) LISTED IN THIS REPORT IS (ARE) USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REGARDING THIS EVENT AFTER FILING THIS REPORT SHALL BE FILED ON A SUPPLEMENTAL MDR. WITHOUT A LOT NUMBER THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS REVIEW COULD NOT BE COMPLETED. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION, THE CHUCK WAS WORKING AS DESIGNED UNTIL THE SURGEON USED A MALLET TO TRY AND REMOVE THE REAMING ROD. THE CHUCK IS NOT DESIGNED TO BE IMPACTED IN SUCH A WAY AND THEREFORE THE CONDITION NOTED WAS NOT CAUSED BY A DESIGN ISSUE. THE DESIGN IS ACCEPTABLE AND THE COMPLAINT IS INVALID. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT DETERMINED FURTHER INVESTIGATION WAS NOT NECESSARY BECAUSE THE DESIGN WAS WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS.
SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT AS A RESULT OF REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO FDA WARNING LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 2012. DEVICE(S) LISTED IN THIS REPORT IS (ARE) USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REGARDING THIS EVENT AFTER FILING THIS REPORT SHALL BE FILED ON A SUPPLEMENTAL MDR. ADDITIONAL NARRATIVE: THE PART/ LOT NUMBER COMBINATION PROVIDED COULD NOT BE VERIFIED. THE ORIGINAL IMPLANT DATE OF THE ROD WAS REPORTED TO BE (B)(6) 2011 AND THE EXPLANT OF THE BROKEN ROD WAS REPORTED TO BE (B)(6) 2011. (B)(4). PLACEHOLDER.
THE MANUFACTURING DOCUMENTS WERE REVIEWED AND NO COMPLAINT RELATED ISSUES WERE FOUND. PLACEHOLDER.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CHUCK WAS BROKEN TRYING TO REMOVE A BROKEN ROD AND WAS OUTSIDE THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THE BROKEN CHUCK. THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR (B)(4).
THE CHUCK WAS BROKEN WHEN THE SURGEON USED THE CHUCK TO REMOVE A DEPUY FEMORAL SUBTROCHANTERIC ROD WHICH WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. DEPUY HAS NO INSTRUMENTS TO REMOVE THE BROKEN ROD. IN ORDER TO REMOVE THE ROD, THE SURGEON TIGHTENED THE CHUCK ON THE GUIDE WIRE. HE THEN USED VISE GRIPS TO GRAB THE WIRE IN FRONT OF THE CHUCK. THE CHUCK WAS BEING USED TO KEEP THE VISE GRIPS FROM SLIDING. THE SURGEON USED A MALLET TO BANG ON THE VISE GRIPS, AND THEN THE CHUCK STOPPED WORKING, AND COULD NOT BE OPENED OR CLOSED. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO USE A SECOND VISE GRIP IN PLACE OF THE CHUCK TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. WHEN THE ROD WAS REMOVED, CONSULTANT REPORTED THERE WAS NON-UNION OF THE FEMORAL FRACTURE WITH THE DEPUY PRODUCT; PATIENT WAS REVISED TO A 15MM X 400MM SYNTHES LATERAL ENTRY NAIL. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DELAY TO THE SURGERY AND NO EFFECT ON THE PATIENT STATUS OR OUTCOME WAS NOTED IN THE EVENT DETAILS
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 173762 | SMALL UNIVERSAL CHUCK WITH T-HANDLE | LXH | SYNTHES GMBH | 8017561 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 YR |