ULTRAFLEX? TRACHEOBRONCHIAL
Report
- Report Number
- 3005099803-2013-02419
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- April 8, 2013
- Date of Event
- March 15, 2013
- Report Date
- March 18, 2013
- Manufacturer
- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
- Product Code
- JCT
- PMA / PMN Number
- K012883
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AU
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
(B)(4):THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED FOR ANALYSIS. UPON RECEIPT AND COMPLETION OF THE FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE, IF THERE IS ANY FURTHER RELEVANT INFORMATION FROM THAT REVIEW, A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED.
ONLY THE DEPLOYED STENT WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. A VISUAL EXAMINATION OF THE RETURNED STENT FOUND THAT A STENT ROW FROM ONE END OF THE STENT HAD UNRAVELLED. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) WAS PERFORMED, WHICH CONFIRMED THAT THE DEVICE MET ALL MANUFACTURING SPECIFICATIONS. A REVIEW OF COMPLAINT HISTORY FOR THE REPORTED LOT NUMBER WAS PERFORMED AND CONCLUDED THERE WERE NO OTHER COMPLAINTS REPORTED FOR THIS LOT. A LABELING REVIEW WAS PERFORMED AND, FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE, THIS DEVICE WAS USED PER THE DIRECTIONS FOR USE (DFU) / PRODUCT LABEL. THE INVESTIGATION CONCLUDED THAT THE COMPLAINT IS ASSOCIATED WITH A PRODUCT THAT MEETS THE DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE SPECIFICATIONS BUT DUE TO ANATOMICAL/PROCEDURAL FACTORS ENCOUNTERED DURING THE PROCEDURE, PERFORMANCE OF THE DEVICE WAS LIMITED. THE MOST PROBABLE ROOT CAUSE CLASSIFICATION IS OPERATIONAL CONTEXT.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL STENT WAS USED DURING A BRONCHIAL STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6), 2013.ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, AFTER PLACING THE STENT, THE DOCTOR WANTED TO ADJUST THE POSITION OF THE STENT AND PULL IT PROXIMAL. THE DOCTOR GRABBED THE GREEN SUTURE AND THE TOP PART OF THE STENT WITH A BIOPSY FORCEPS, AFTER USING EXCESSIVE FORCE THE TOP ROW OF THE STENT WIRES UNRAVELLED FROM THE BODY OF THE STENT AND THE SUTURE BROKE. THE STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND ANOTHER ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL STENT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE POST PROCEDURE.
IT WAS REPORTED TO BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION THAT AN ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL STENT WAS USED DURING A BRONCHIAL STENT PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2013. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, DURING THE PROCEDURE, AFTER PLACING THE STENT, THE DOCTOR WANTED TO ADJUST THE POSITION OF THE STENT AND PULL IT PROXIMAL. THE DOCTOR GRABBED THE GREEN SUTURE AND THE TOP PART OF THE STENT WITH A BIOPSY FORCEPS, AFTER USING EXCESSIVE FORCE THE TOP ROW OF THE STENT WIRES UNRAVELLED FROM THE BODY OF THE STENT AND THE SUTURE BROKE. THE STENT WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND ANOTHER ULTRAFLEX TRACHEOBRONCHIAL STENT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO PATIENT COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE PATIENT'S CONDITION WAS REPORTED TO BE STABLE POST PROCEDURE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 143666 | ULTRAFLEX? TRACHEOBRONCHIAL | PROSTHESIS, TRACHEAL, EXPANDABLE | JCT | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY | M00564780 | 0015576352 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |