VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS TSH REAGENT
Report
- Report Number
- 3007111389-2013-00082
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- April 4, 2013
- Date of Event
- April 4, 2013
- Report Date
- May 10, 2013
- Manufacturer
- ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS
- Product Code
- JLW
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IN, US
- Reporter Occupation
- MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST
Narratives
THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT REPRODUCIBLE, LOWER THAN EXPECTED VITROS TSH RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FROM THREE DIFFERENT PATIENT SAMPLES WHILE USING THE VITROS 5600 SYSTEM WHEN COMPARED TO NON-VITROS TSH RESULTS. THE INVESTIGATION WAS UNABLE TO DETERMINE A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE. HOWEVER, THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE WAS DETERMINED TO BE REAGENT RELATED. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT AN INSTRUMENT RELATED ISSUE CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT. THE INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING.
THE INVESTIGATION DETERMINED THAT THE CUSTOMER OBTAINED MULTIPLE, REPRODUCIBLE, LOWER THAN EXPECTED VITROS TSH RESULTS FROM A SINGLE PATIENT SAMPLE USING A VITROS 5600 SYSTEM WHEN COMPARED TO A NON-VITROS METHOD. IN ADDITION, DURING INVESTIGATION, THE CUSTOMER OBTAINED MULTIPLE, REPRODUCIBLE, LOWER THAN EXPECTED VITROS TSH RESULTS FROM MULTIPLE PATIENT CORRELATION SAMPLES WITH THREE DIFFERENT VITROS TSH REAGENT LOTS USING TWO DIFFERENT VITROS 5600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM WHEN COMPARED TO A NON-VITROS METHOD. THE INVESTIGATION WAS UNABLE TO DETERMINE A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE. HOWEVER, THE VITROS TSH REAGENTS IN USE OR VARIABILITY BETWEEN THE TWO METHODS COULD NOT BE RULED OUT. MULTIPLE PATIENT SAMPLE CORRELATION TESTS BETWEEN THE VITROS ASSAY AND ONE OF THE NON-VITROS METHODS INDICATED A FIXED NEGATIVE BIAS FOR VITROS RESULTS. THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE THAT AN INSTRUMENT RELATED ISSUE CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT. THERE WAS NO HISTORIC EVIDENCE THAT A REAGENT RELATED ISSUE CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT. THE INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING.
A CUSTOMER OBTAINED MULTIPLE, REPRODUCIBLE, LOWER THAN EXPECTED VITROS TSH RESULTS FROM A SINGLE PATIENT SAMPLE USING A VITROS 5600 SYSTEM WHEN COMPARED TO A NON-VITROS METHOD. IN ADDITION, DURING INVESTIGATION, THE CUSTOMER OBTAINED MULTIPLE, REPRODUCIBLE, LOWER THAN EXPECTED VITROS TSH RESULTS FROM MULTIPLE PATIENT CORRELATION SAMPLES WITH THREE DIFFERENT VITROS TSH REAGENT LOTS USING TWO DIFFERENT VITROS 5600 INTEGRATED SYSTEM WHEN COMPARED TO A NON-VITROS METHOD. THE FOLLOWING RESULTS WERE OBTAINED: PATIENT RESULTS USING VITROS TSH LOT 4220: VITROS VS. NON-VITROS METHOD; PATIENT RESULTS = 0.25, 0.26 VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 1.375 MIU/L; PATIENT CORRELATION SAMPLE RESULTS: VITROS (TSH LOT 4220) VS. NON-VITROS METHOD: SAMPLE 1 = 0.40 VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 2.29 MIU/L; SAMPLE 2 = 0.020, <0.015 VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.54 MIU/L; SAMPLE 3 = 0.29, 0.31 VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.68 MIU/L; SAMPLE 4 = 0.20 VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.289 MIU/L; SAMPLE 5 = 0.090 VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.114 MIU/L; SAMPLE 9 = 0.290 (5600 #1) VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.682 MIU/L; SAMPLE 10 = 0.020 (5600 #1) VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.540 MIU/L; VITROS (TSH LOT 4200) VS. NON-VITROS METHOD: SAMPLE 6 = 0.085 (5600# 2) VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.14 MIU/L; SAMPLE 9 = 0.218 (5600 #2) VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.682 MIU/L; SAMPLE 10 < 0.015 (5600 #2) VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.540 MIU/L; VITROS (TSH LOT 4270) VS. NON-VITROS METHOD: SAMPLE 16 = 0.23 VS. AN EXPECTED RESULT = 0.866 MIU/L; THE AFFECTED PATIENT RESULT OF 0.25 MIU/L WAS REPORTED OUT OF THE LABORATORY. BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION. HOWEVER, THE PHYSICIAN QUESTIONED THE RESULT AND THE SAMPLE WAS RETESTED. A CORRECTED REPORT WITH NON-VITROS RESULT WAS ISSUED. THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THIS REPORT IS NUMBER ONE OF SIX MDR'S FOR THIS EVENT. SIX 3500A FORMS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR THIS EVENT AS SIX DEVICES WERE INVOLVED. (B)(4).
A CUSTOMER OBTAINED REPRODUCIBLE, LOWER THAN EXPECTED VITROS TSH RESULTS FROM THREE DIFFERENT PATIENT SAMPLES WHILE USING THE VITROS 5600 SYSTEM WHEN COMPARED TO NON-VITROS TSH RESULTS. PATIENT 1 VITROS RESULT = 2.95 VS. AN EXPECTED NON-VITROS RESULT = 4.360 MIU/L; PATIENT 2 VITROS RESULT = 0.054 VS. AN EXPECTED NON-VITROS RESULT = 0.107 MIU/L; PATIENT 3 VITROS RESULT = 0.051 VS. AN EXPECTED NON-VITROS RESULT = 0.104 MIU/L; BIASED RESULTS OF THE MAGNITUDE AND DIRECTION OBSERVED MAY LEAD TO INAPPROPRIATE PHYSICIAN ACTION. . THERE WAS NO REPORT OF PATIENT HARM AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. (B)(4).
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138399 | VITROS IMMUNODIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS TSH REAGENT | IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTIC | JLW | ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS | 4220 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |