RATCHET T-HANDLE 6MM QC
Report
- Report Number
- 1719045-2013-10469
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- April 2, 2013
- Date of Event
- May 16, 2012
- Report Date
- May 16, 2012
- Manufacturer
- SYNTHES MONUMENT
- Product Code
- HXX
- PMA / PMN Number
- EXEMPT
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- ID, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT AS A RESULT OF REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO FDA WARNING LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 2012. DEVICE(S) LISTED IN THIS REPORT IS (ARE) USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REGARDING THIS EVENT AFTER FILING THIS REPORT SHALL BE FILED ON A SUPPLEMENTAL MDR. NO SAMPLE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD DID NOT SHOW CONDITIONS THAT COULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THIS COMPLAINT IS CONSIDERED INDETERMINATE FROM A MANUFACTURING PERSPECTIVE.
(B)(4). MANUFACTURING EVALUATION REPORTS THAT THE PARTS WERE TESTED FOR FUNCTION AS RECEIVED AND THE UNIT FAILED. THE HANDLE SLIPPED WHEN USED IN THE FORWARD AND REVERSE POSITIONS, WHEN FORCE WAS APPLIED. THERE WAS NO HISTORY ON THE DEVICE TO INDICATE USAGE, TIMES AUTOCLAVED, OR CLEANING CYCLES. IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS COULD BE A SERVICE ISSUE SINCE IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PARTS BE ON A RECALIBRATION/REVIEW CYCLE. THE PARTS WERE REVIEWED AND MET DIMENSIONAL SPECIFICATIONS AND WERE MANUFACTURED AND PROCESSED PER THE SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. THIS COMPLAINT CONDITION IS NOT RELATED TO THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION REVEALED NO FUNCTIONAL OR DESIGN ABNORMALITIES WITH RESPECT TO THE DRIVER ASSEMBLY OR RATCHETING FUNCTION. THE RATCHETING T-HANDLE WAS PRESENTED AS RECEIVED, ACCOMPANIED BY A LONG T25 DRIVER. THE T-HANDLE WAS COUPLED/DECOUPLED WITH THE T25 DRIVER, AND SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED EACH OF THE RATCHETING FUNCTIONS, CLOCK-WISE RATCHETING, NEUTRAL POSITIONING, AND COUNTER CLOCK-WISE RATCHETING, WITHOUT INCIDENT. NO REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT HISTORY WAS PERFORMED, AS THE DEVICE SHOWED NO EVIDENCE OF DEFICIENCY. THE MATRIX SURGICAL TECHNIQUE GUIDE, ILLUSTRATES THE PROPER METHOD OF LOADING AND UNLOADING MATRIX PEDICLE SCREWS USING A LOCKING HOLDING SLEEVE IN CONJUNCTION WITH A MATRIX T25 DRIVER. EVIDENCE WOULD INDICATE THAT THE ISSUE WAS CAUSED BY UNFAMILIARITY WITH THE INSTRUMENTS FUNCTION. DUE TO THE LACK OF EVIDENCE REGARDING DEFICIENT PERFORMANCE, THIS COMPLAINT IS CONSIDERED INVALID FROM A MANUFACTURING PERSPECTIVE. THE REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD DID NOT SHOW ANY CONDITIONS THAT COULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A MINIMALLY INVASIVE L4-S1 LUMBAR FUSION THE MATRIX SCREW TECHNIQUE WAS FOLLOWED TO FINAL TIGHTEN THE SCREWS. THE SURGEON PROCEEDED TO ADJUST THE ROD ON THE PATIENT'S RIGHT SIDE. THE LOCKING CAP AT L5 WOULD NOT LOOSEN WITH THE STRAIGHT HANDLE SCREWDRIVER. NEXT THE T-HANDLE SCREWDRIVER AND COUNTER-TORQUE WERE USED; THIS ALSO WOULD NOT LOOSEN THE SCREW. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO LOOSEN THE LOCKING CAP WITH THE TECHNIQUE DESCRIBED IN THE MATRIX TECHNIQUE GUIDE WITH THE TORQUE HANDLE AND COUNTER TORQUE, THE SURGEON WAS UNSUCCESSFUL. THE TECHNIQUE WITH THE SIMPLE PERSUADER WAS THEN USED ALONG WITH RATCHET T-HANDLE AND STRAIGHT TIP DRIVER AT WHICH THE RATCHET DRIVER FAILED UNDER THE FORCE APPLIED. A NEW HANDLE WAS THEN PUT ON THE STRAIGHT TIP DRIVER AND THE SURGEON TRIED AGAIN. THE STRAIGHT TIP SCREWDRIVER BROKE NEAR THE TIP UNDER THE HIGH FORCE WHICH WAS APPLIED. TWO SMALL PIECES OF SCREWDRIVER TIP WERE RETRIEVED AND APPEARED TO BE ALL ACCOUNTED FOR. THE PATIENT WAS UNHARMED. THE SURGEON THEN DECIDED TO FORGO FURTHER ATTEMPTS TO LOOSEN THE LOCKING CAP.THIS IS 1 OF 10 REPORTS FOR THE SAME EVENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 133887 | RATCHET T-HANDLE 6MM QC | HXX | SYNTHES MONUMENT | 6599437 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 YR |