FDA Adverse Event Malfunction Summary report: N

ZERO-P VA IMPLANT 7MM HEIGHT PARALLEL-STERILE

MDR report key: 3031801 · Received April 2, 2013

Report

Report Number
8030965-2013-10636
Event Type
Malfunction
Date Received
April 2, 2013
Report Date
March 7, 2012
Manufacturer
SYNTHES GMBH
Product Code
OVE
PMA / PMN Number
K112068
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
AZ, US
Reporter Occupation
OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT AS A RESULT OF REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO FDA WARNING LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 2012. DEVICE(S) LISTED IN THIS REPORT IS (ARE) USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REGARDING THIS EVENT AFTER FILING THIS REPORT SHALL BE FILED ON A SUPPLEMENTAL MDR. MANUFACTURING EVALUATION REPORTS THAT THE SAMPLE WAS RECEIVED WITH CATCH MECHANISM ON THE CRANIAL SIDE OF THE PLATE STUCK. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD DID NOT SHOW CONDITIONS THAT COULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION REVEALS THAT MEASUREMENT OF THE RELEVANT DIMENSIONS WERE OUT OF SPECIFICATION. FROM A DESIGN STANDPOINT THIS COMPLAINT IS CONSIDERED INDETERMINATE. A CAPA RISK ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED FOR THE IDENTIFIED NON-CONFORMANCE. BASED ON THE RESULTS OF THIS RISK ASSESSMENT A CAPA WILL NOT BE INITIATED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

SYNTHES IS SUBMITTING THIS REPORT AS A RESULT OF REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES RELATED TO FDA WARNING LETTER DATED FEBRUARY 2012. DEVICE(S) LISTED IN THIS REPORT IS (ARE) USED FOR TREATMENT, NOT DIAGNOSIS. ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REGARDING THIS EVENT AFTER FILING THIS REPORT SHALL BE FILED ON A SUPPLEMENTAL MDR. PLACEHOLDER.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A 2-LEVEL ZERO-P VA PROCEDURE AT LEVELS C4-C5 AND C5-C6, THE SURGEON HAD INSERTED THE TRIAL, REMOVED IT, THEN PLACED THE ZERO-P IMPLANT, SIZE 7 AND INSERTED THE SCREW INTO THE IMPLANT AT LEVEL C4-C5. THE GOLD BLOCKING MECHANISM IN THE IMPLANT NEVER POPPED UP TO LOCK THE SCREW IN PLACE. THE SURGEON TIGHTENED THE SCREW DOWN A LITTLE MORE, TOOK FLUOROSCOPIC IMAGES TO CHECK THE ANGLE OF THE SCREW, WHICH WAS CORRECT. THE SURGEON NOTED THAT THE BLOCKING MECHANISM STILL HAD NOT POPPED UP AS IT SHOULD. THE SURGEON THEN REMOVED THE ENTIRE IMPLANT, REPLACED WITH ANOTHER SAME SIZE ZERO-P, AND REINSERTED THE ORIGINAL SCREWS, AND THE BLOCKING MECHANISM IN THE NEW IMPLANT FUNCTIONED PROPERLY. THE SURGEON COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE WITH NO FURTHER PROBLEM.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

THIS IS REPORT 1 OF 1 FOR COMPLAINT (B)(4).

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
133884 ZERO-P VA IMPLANT 7MM HEIGHT PARALLEL-STERILE OVE SYNTHES GMBH 7706771

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 60 YR