FDA Adverse Event Malfunction Summary report: N

SYNCHROMED II

MDR report key: 2990392 · Received March 5, 2013

Report

Report Number
3007566237-2013-00682
Event Type
Malfunction
Date Received
March 5, 2013
Date of Event
March 14, 2006
Report Date
June 5, 2018
Manufacturer
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
Product Code
LKK
PMA / PMN Number
P860004
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
TX, US
Reporter Occupation
OTHER

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

PRODUCT ID 8731, SERIAL # (B)(4), IMPLANTED: (B)(6) 2006, PRODUCT TYPE CATHETER. (B)(4).

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

PRODUCT ID: 8731, SERIAL# (B)(4), IMPLANTED: (B)(6) 2006, PRODUCT TYPE: CATHETER; PRODUCT ID: 8731. OTHER RELEVANT DEVICE(S) ARE: PRODUCT ID: 8731, SERIAL/LOT #: (B)(4), UBD: (B)(6) 2008, UDI#: (B)(4). IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CATHETER WAS DISCONNECTED FROM THE OLD PUMP DURING A REPLACEMENT FOR NORMAL BATTERY DEPLETION/END OF LIFE (EOL). THEY TRIED TO ASPIRATE USING A TB SYRINGE TO CHECK FOR CATHETER PATENCY. IT WAS THOUGHT THAT THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER (HCP) PULLED BACK 0.15 MILLILITERS (ML) OF FLUID. THE CATHETER VOLUME WAS 0.197. A DYE STUDY WAS GOING TO BE PERFORMED TO CHECK THE CATHETER PATENCY. THE PATIENT HAD COMPLAINED ABOUT THERAPY SINCE IMPLANT; THAT THEY NEVER HAD THERAPEUTIC EFFECT. THE PUMP WAS REPORTED TO BE DELIVERING BUPIVACAINE, PRIALT AND DILAUDID. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NEVER PRESCRIBED PRIALT. THE DOSAGES OF THE DRUGS WERE NOT AVAILABLE. THE PATIENT WAS HAVING POOR PAIN CONTROL BEFORE THE PUMP REPLACEMENT. THE CATHETER WAS A LITTLE "SLUGGISH" WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WAS TRYING TO DRAIN IT, BUT HE FINALLY DRAINED ABOUT 1/2 CUBIC CENTIMETER (CC). THE PHYSICIAN THEN FLUSHED IT WITH NORMAL SALINE AND IT STARTED FLOWING VERY WELL. HE HAD GOOD CEREBRAL SPINAL FLUID (CSF) FLOW. THE CATHETER WAS NOT REPLACED OR REVISED. THE PATIENT RECEIVED THE NEW PUMP AND DID WELL DURING SURGERY.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) INDICATED HE OPERATED ON HER (B)(6) 2012 AND REPLACED HER PUMP. HE STATED THAT THE CATHETER WAS NOT DRAINING READILY BUT SALINE WAS INJECTED INTO THE CATHETER AND HE FELT THAT A GOOD FLOW WAS ESTABLISHED. THE DRUG MIXTURE FROM THE OLD PUMP WAS REMOVED AND 20CC WERE REPLACED. HE STATED THAT SHE RESPONDED WELL AFTER THE PROCEDURE AND RESPONDED WELL TO MEDICATION INJECTIONS. THE HCP ONLY SAW HER (B)(6) 2012, AND THERE WAS SOME SWELLING AROUND THE LUMBAR AREA AND THE FAMILY HAD QUESTIONS ABOUT THE CATHETER, BUT IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS GOOD FLOW AT SURGERY AND SHE WAS RECEIVING GOOD TREATMENT SO AT THAT TIME THEY WERE NOT PLANNING FOR REOPERATION. THE HCP TOLD THE PATIENT TO WEAR HER BINDER AS LONG AS SHE HAD SWELLING 24-7 AND HE WAS GOING TO REASSESS HER ON A REGULAR BASIS HER AS NEEDED. THE LAST TIME THE HCP SAW HER WAS (B)(6) AND AT THAT TIME THE MEDICATION LEVEL WAS WORKING SATISFACTORY AND SHE WAS GETTING SATISFACTORY PAIN RELIEF. HE STATED THAT SHE STILL HAD SOME QUESTIONS ABOUT THE LUMBAR SITE AND THE SWELLING ALONG THE RIGHT FLANK AND UPON EXAMINATION IT WAS DETERMINED THE PUMP WAS WORKING FINE AND HE RECOMMENDED THAT SHE CONTINUE WEARING THE BINDER AS LONG AS SHE HAD THOSE CONCERNS/COMPLAINTS. HE STATED THAT THE PATIENT SUGGESTED THAT THEY HAD DISCUSSED A DYE TEST AT SOME POINT, HOWEVER THE MOTHER AND PATIENT ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE PATIENT WAS GETTING SATISFACTORY PAIN RELIEF GENERALLY AND WAS RELATIVELY SATISFIED WITH HER CONDITION AT THAT POINT ON (B)(6) 2012 AND THE HCP NEVER SAW HER AFTER THAT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED/ANTICIPATED OR EXPECTED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
93573 SYNCHROMED II PUMP, INFUSION, IMPLANTED, PROGRAMMABLE LKK MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION 863720

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 25 YR