ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2013-00621
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- February 5, 2013
- Date of Event
- May 29, 2012
- Report Date
- January 10, 2013
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- NIM
- PMA / PMN Number
- P040012
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- GR
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. THE REPORTED PATIENT EFFECTS OF CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT, INFECTION, AND TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK (TIA) ARE KNOWN OBSERVED AND POTENTIAL ADVERSE EVENTS AS LISTED IN THE RX ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. ALTHOUGH A CONCLUSIVE CAUSE FOR THE REPORTED PATIENT EFFECTS, AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE PRODUCT, IF ANY, CANNOT BE DETERMINED, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCY WITH RESPECT TO MANUFACTURING, DESIGN OR LABELING. DATE OF EVENT ESTIMATED BASED ON DATE OF PUBLICATION. DATE OF IMPLANT ESTIMATE BASED ON DATE OF PUBLICATION. THE XACT REFERENCED IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MANUFACTURING REPORT NUMBER. PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER EUROPEAN STUDY OF THE GORE FLOW REVERSAL SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING NEUROPROTECTION DURING CAROTID ARTERY STENTING, PAGES 1060 TO 1068.
THIS EVENT WAS CAPTURED BASED ON AN ARTICLE REVIEW: BACKGROUND: EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES (EPDS) ARE USED TO PROVIDE PROTECTION AGAINST BRAIN EMBOLIZATION DURING CAROTID ARTERY STENTING (CAS) TO TREAT CAROTID ARTERY STENOSIS, BUT THE OPTIMAL TYPE OF EPD HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED. DISTALLY POSITIONED FILTERS ARE COMMONLY USED BUT DO NOT PROVIDE PROTECTION DURING CROSSING OF THE LESION. THIS PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER STUDY INVESTIGATED A PROXIMALLY PLACED DEVICE (GORE FLOW REVERSAL SYSTEM) THAT REVERSES BLOOD FLOW IN THE INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY DURING CAS, THEREBY DIRECTING EMBOLI AWAY FROM THE BRAIN. METHODS AND RESULTS: OUTCOMES IN 122 PATIENTS (28% SYMPTOMATIC), WHO UNDERWENT CAS USING THE FLOW REVERSAL SYSTEM WERE ASSESSED (INTENTION-TO-TREAT ANALYSIS). THE PRIMARY ENDPOINT WAS A MAJOR ADVERSE EVENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF CAS. THE SECONDARY ENDPOINT WAS A MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION (MI) OR NONSTROKE-RELATED NEUROLOGIC EVENT WITHIN 30 DAYS. THE FLOW REVERSAL SYSTEM COULD NOT BE USED IN ONE PATIENT BECAUSE OF SEVERE VESSEL TORTUOSITY AND IN TWO PATIENTS (1.6%) BECAUSE OF INTOLERANCE. THE 30-DAYS MAE RATE AND THE SECONDARY ENDPOINT RATE WERE EACH 1.6%. NO PATIENT IN THE SERIES DIED OR HAD A MI WITHIN 30 DAYS. NO PATIENT WHO WAS SYMPTOMATIC BEFORE CAS HAD AN MAE. ONE SYMPTOMATIC AND ONE ASYMPTOMATIC PATIENT HAD A TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK. CONCLUSIONS: USE OF THE GORE FLOW REVERSAL SYSTEM DURING CAS HAD A HIGH RATE OF TECHNICAL SUCCESS AND LOW 30-DAY RATES OF ADVERSE NEUROLOGIC AND CARDIAC EVENTS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 49212 | ACCULINK CAROTID STENT SYSTEM | CAROTID STENT SYSTEM | NIM | AV-TEMECULA-CT |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hospitalization| R| S |