TROPONIN T
Report
- Report Number
- 1823260-2013-00536
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- January 30, 2013
- Date of Event
- January 12, 2013
- Report Date
- September 9, 2013
- Manufacturer
- ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
- Product Code
- MMI
- PMA / PMN Number
- K961500
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- LA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST
Narratives
IT WAS UNKNOWN IF THE INITIAL REPORTER SENT REPORT TO THE FDA.
THE INVESTIGATION COULD NOT DETERMINE A SPECIFIC ROOT CAUSE BASED ON THE PROVIDED INFORMATION.
THE CUSTOMER DISCOVERED QUESTIONABLE TROPONIN T RESULTS HAD BEEN GENERATED BY THE ANALYTICAL E MODULE SERIAL NUMBER (B)(4) WHEN THEY NOTED THE QC RESULTS WERE HALF OF THE NORMAL RESULT. ALL PATIENT SAMPLES TESTED SINCE THE LAST VALID QC WERE REPEATED ON THE ELECSYS 2010 ANALYZER SERIAL NUMBER (B)(4) ON (B)(6) 2013. OF THE DATA PROVIDED FOR 52 PATIENT SAMPLES, THE RESULTS FOR 11 PATIENT SAMPLES WERE DISCREPANT. ALL RESULTS ARE IN NG/ML. PATIENT SAMPLE 1 INITIAL RESULT WAS 0.019 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.042. PATIENT SAMPLE 2 INITIAL RESULT WAS 0.156 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.225. PATIENT SAMPLE 3 INITIAL RESULT WAS 4.88 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 6.86. THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES WERE ORIGINALLY TESTED (B)(6) 2013. PATIENT SAMPLE 4 INITIAL RESULT WAS 0.075 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.112. PATIENT SAMPLE 5 INITIAL RESULT WAS 6.79 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 9.44. PATIENT SAMPLE 6 INITIAL RESULT WAS 1.04 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 1.49. PATIENT SAMPLE 7 INITIAL RESULT WAS 0.014 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.03. THE DATE OF ORIGINAL TESTING WAS UNKNOWN FOR THE FOLLOWING SAMPLES. PATIENT SAMPLE 8 INITIAL RESULT WAS <0.010 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.023. PATIENT SAMPLE 9 INITIAL RESULT WAS 0.013 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.033. PATIENT SAMPLE 10 INITIAL RESULT WAS 0.023 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.046. PATIENT SAMPLE 11 INITIAL RESULT WAS 0.061 AND THE REPEAT RESULT WAS 0.102. THE INITIAL RESULTS HAD BEEN REPORTED OUTSIDE THE LABORATORY. THE REPEAT RESULTS WERE BELIEVED TO BE CORRECT. THE CUSTOMER WAS NOT AWARE OF ANY ADVERSE EVENTS. THE FIELD SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE DETERMINED THERE WAS A BAD REAGENT PACK. HE CHECKED THE ANALYZER AND FOUND IT WAS FINE. THE CUSTOMER OPENED A NEW REAGENT PACK, CALIBRATED THE TROPONIN ASSAY AND RAN CONTROLS WHICH WERE FINE AND IN RANGE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40985 | TROPONIN T | IMMUNOASSAY METHOD, TROPONIN SUBUNIT | MMI | ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS | NA | 16887801 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |