FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

PINNACLE MTL INS NEUT36IDX56OD (DOI: 3/14/2006 - DOR 3/14/2008)

MDR report key: 2876249 · Received December 17, 2012

Report

Report Number
1818910-2012-22975
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
December 17, 2012
Date of Event
March 14, 2008
Report Date
November 19, 2012
Manufacturer
DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. 1818910
Product Code
KWA
PMA / PMN Number
K003523
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
PA, US
Reporter Occupation
ATTORNEY

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

UPDATE: 11/19/2012 - PATIENT'S MEDICAL RECORDS WERE RECEIVED FROM LEGAL AND ATTACHED ELECTRONICALLY TO THE COMPLAINT. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2008 DUE TO PAIN. IT WAS NOTED THAT AN ACETABULAR FIXATION SCREW WAS PENETRATING THE INNER TABLE PRESUMABLY INTO THE ILIACUS MUSCLE POSSIBLY EXPLAINING THE SYMPTOMS. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2009 DUE TO PAIN AND SUPERIOR INSTABILITY. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2010 DUE TO PAIN AND ACETABULAR LOOSENING. THE DEVICES WERE IDENTIFIED. PATIENT HEIGHT: (B)(6). THE DEVICES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT WERE NOT RETURNED. A SEARCH OF THE COMPLAINT DATABASE FOUND NO ADDITIONAL REPORTS FOR THE REPORTED PART AND LOT CODE COMBINATIONS. THE INVESTIGATION COULD NOT VERIFY OR IDENTIFY ANY PRODUCT CONTRIBUTION TO THE REPORTED EVENT WITH THE INFORMATION PROVIDED. BASED ON THE INABILITY TO IDENTIFY A ROOT CAUSE CORRECTIVE ACTION WAS NOT ESTABLISHED. DEPUY CONSIDERS THE INVESTIGATION CLOSED AT THIS TIME. SHOULD ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE RECEIVED TO CHANGE THE OUTCOME OF THE PERFORMED INVESTIGATION, THE COMPLAINT WILL BE RE-OPENED.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

THIS COMPLAINT IS STILL UNDER INVESTIGATION.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

(B)(4). NO DEVICE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REPORT WAS RECEIVED FOR EXAMINATION. THE INFORMATION RECEIVED WILL BE RETAINED FOR POTENTIAL SERIES INVESTIGATIONS IF TRIGGERED BY TREND ANALYSIS, POST MARKET SURVEILLANCE, OR OTHER EVENTS WITHIN THE QUALITY SYSTEM. DEPUY CONSIDERS THE INVESTIGATION CLOSED. SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE RECEIVED, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REVIEWED AND THE INVESTIGATION WILL BE RE-OPENED AS NECESSARY. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

LITIGATION PAPERS ALLEGE: PATIENT HAD HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2006. SOMETIME IN 2007, PATIENT BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE PERSISTENT SHARP PAIN IN THE GROIN AREA. THIS PAIN PERSISTED AND IN 2008 PATIENT'S DOCTOR DECIDED HE NEEDED TO HAVE HIS HIP IMPLANT SURGICALLY REMOVED AND REPLACED. ON (B)(6) 2008, PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION SURGERY. OVER TIME, PATIENT BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE PROGRESSIVE PAIN AND HIS DOCTOR DECIDED HE NEEDED TO HAVE HIS HIP IMPLANT SURGICALLY REMOVED AND REPLACED AGAIN. ON (B)(6) 2009, PATIENT UNDERWENT ANOTHER REVISION SURGERY. OVER TIME, PATIENT BEGAN EXPERIENCING A POPPING SENSATION IN HIS HIP ANTERIORLY AND PAIN POSTEROLATERALLY. PATIENTS DOCTOR DECIDED HE NEEDED TO HAVE HIS HIP IMPLANT SURGICALLY REMOVED AND REPLACED FOR A THIRD TIME. ON (B)(6) 2010, PATIENT UNDERWENT ANOTHER REVISION SURGERY. (B)(6). UPDATE: (B)(6) 2012 - PATIENT'S MEDICAL RECORDS WERE RECEIVED FROM LEGAL AND ATTACHED ELECTRONICALLY TO THE COMPLAINT. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2008 DUE TO PAIN. IT WAS NOTED THAT AN ACETABULAR FIXATION SCREW WAS PENETRATING THE INNER TABLE PRESUMABLY INTO THE ILIACUS MUSCLE POSSIBLY EXPLAINING THE SYMPTOMS. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2009 DUE TO PAIN AND SUPERIOR INSTABILITY. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2010 DUE TO PAIN AND ACETABULAR LOOSENING. THE DEVICES WERE IDENTIFIED. PATIENT HEIGHT: (B)(6).

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 PINNACLE MTL INS NEUT36IDX56OD (DOI: 3/14/2006 - DOR 3/14/2008) TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT KWA DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. 1818910 2061468

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 42 YR Required Intervention