XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2012-07732
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- December 7, 2012
- Date of Event
- November 15, 2012
- Report Date
- November 15, 2012
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- NIQ
- PMA / PMN Number
- P070015
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- TU
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. THE STENT DAMAGE WAS ABLE TO BE CONFIRMED. THE FAILURE TO ADVANCE AND DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM COULD NOT BE REPLICATED IN A TESTING ENVIRONMENT AS IT WAS BASED ON OPERATIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. BASED ON A VISUAL AND DIMENSIONAL INSPECTION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD REVEALED NO NON-CONFORMANCES THAT WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. THE RESULTS OF THE QUERY OF SIMILAR INCIDENTS IN THE COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE FOR THIS LOT DID NOT INDICATE A MANUFACTURING ISSUE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) STATES: AN UNEXPANDED STENT MAY BE RETRACTED INTO THE GUIDING CATHETER ONE TIME ONLY. AN UNEXPANDED STENT SHOULD NOT BE REINTRODUCED INTO THE ARTERY ONCE IT HAS BEEN PULLED BACK INTO THE GUIDING CATHETER. SUBSEQUENT MOVEMENT IN AND OUT THROUGH THE DISTAL END OF THE GUIDING CATHETER SHOULD NOT BE PERFORMED AS THE STENT MAY BE DAMAGED WHEN RETRACTING THE UNDEPLOYED STENT BACK INTO THE GUIDING CATHETER. BASED ON THE REVIEWED INFORMATION, NO PRODUCT DEFICIENCY WAS IDENTIFIED.
(B)(4). RE-INSERTION. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TARGET LESION WAS A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION (CTO) LOCATED IN THE DISTAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD) WITH HEAVY TORTUOSITY AND HEAVY CALCIFICATION. THE LESION WAS PREDILATED WITH A 2.0 X 20 MM TREK BALLOON. THEN THE 2.5 X 18 MM XIENCE V STENT WAS ATTEMPTED, BUT IT DID NOT CROSS THE LESION, DUE TO HEAVY CALCIFICATION. THE LESION WAS DILATED AGAIN WITH THE SAME TREK BALLOON. THE SAME XIENCE V STENT WAS ATTEMPTED AGAIN, BUT IT DID STILL DID NOT CROSS. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING REMOVAL, BUT FORCE WAS NOT APPLIED. WHEN THE DEVICE WAS OBSERVED OUTSIDE THE ANATOMY, IT WAS NOTED THAT STENT STRUTS WERE FLARED. A NON-ABBOTT BARE METAL STENT WAS THEN ATTEMPTED, BUT IT ALSO DID NOT CROSS THE LESION AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONCLUDED WITHOUT IMPLANTING A STENT. NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS WERE REPORTED. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM | DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM | NIQ | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 2020941 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 YR |