PROPLEGE CORONARY SINUS CATHETER
Report
- Report Number
- 3008500478-2012-00331
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 30, 2012
- Date of Event
- November 13, 2012
- Report Date
- January 24, 2013
- Manufacturer
- EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
- Product Code
- DWF
- PMA / PMN Number
- 5120780
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
DEVICE EVALUATION ANTICIPATED UPON RETURN OF PRODUCT FROM THE CUSTOMER.
THE CATHETER WAS VISUALLY INSPECTED AND A KINK WAS FOUND BETWEEN FROM DISTAL TIP AND FIRST DEPTH MARKER BAND ON THE CATHETER. A FUNCTIONAL ARTICULATION TEST WAS PERFORMED BY ACTUATING THE THUMB SWITCH AND FOUND THAT THE TIP ARTICULATES AS NORMAL WHEN THE THUMB SWITCH IS MOVED THROUGH ITS VARIOUS POSITIONS. THE KINK IN THE RETURNED DEVICE MAY BE INDICATIVE OF EXCESSIVE FORCE OR AGGRESSIVE INSERTION IF IT OCCURRED DURING THE DEVICE PLACEMENT. SINCE NO MANUFACTURING RELATED DEFECTS WERE FOUND ON THE RETURNED DEVICE, THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE PERFORATION IS MOST LIKELY EXCESSIVE FORCE OR AGGRESSIVE INSERTION OF THE DEVICE BY THE USER. NO CAPA REQUIRED AT THIS TIME PER ASSESSMENT. THE INFORMATION GATHERED DURING THIS REPORTED EVENT AND EVALUATION WILL ALSO BE INCLUDED IN TRENDING DATA FOR FUTURE CAPA DETERMINATIONS. A LOT WAS NOT PROVIDED SO A MANUFACTURING RECORDS COULD NOT BE REVIEWED. TRENDS WILL CONTINUE TO BE MONITORED ON A MONTHLY BASIS AND IF FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED, APPROPRIATE INVESTIGATION WILL BE PERFORMED.
THE CATHETER WAS VISUALLY INSPECTED AND A KINK WAS FOUND. A FUNCTIONAL ARTICULATION TEST WAS PERFORMED BY ACTUATING THE THUMB SWITCH AND FOUND THAT THE TIP ARTICULATES AS NORMAL WHEN THE THUMB SWITCH IS MOVED THROUGH ITS VARIOUS POSITIONS. THE REPORT DOES NOT IMPLICATE ANY ALLEGED DEFECTS WITH THE PROPLEGE DEVICE. THE REPORT NOTES THAT WHEN UNDERGOING REPAIR, THE PATIENT HAD A FRIABLE SINUS, WHICH MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE DISSECTION. SINCE THE RETURNED DEVICE WAS NOT DEFECTIVE, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE ROOT CAUSE(S) OF THE COMPLICATIONS REPORTED ARE APPLICATION BASED; HOWEVER, THE ROOT CAUSE IS UNABLE TO BE CONFIRMED. THE DEVICE AS RETURNED MEETS ALL OF THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE KINKS WHICH MAY HAVE OCCURRED DURING CLINICAL HANDLING. LHR REVIEW WAS NOT PERFORMED SINCE THE LOT NUMBER OF THE DEVICE IN QUESTION IS UNKNOWN. IN REGARDS TO THIS COMPLAINT, THERE IS NO ALLEGATION OF PRODUCT MALFUNCTION ONLY AN ADVERSE EVENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE USE OF THE DEVICE. THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE GIVE GUIDANCE AROUND DEVICE PLACEMENT AS: ¿ONCE THE PROPLEGE DEVICE CAN BE SEEN IN THE RIGHT ATRIUM, ADVANCE GENTLY WHILE APPLYING COUNTER CLOCKWISE TORQUE TO ALIGN THE CURVE OF THE DEVICE WITH THE INTRA-ATRIAL SEPTUM TO PLACE THE PROPLEGE DEVICE TIP AT THE OSTIUM OF THE CORONARY SINUS. ¿ THERE IS ALSO WARNINGS REGARDING POSITIONING AND INJURIES THAT MAY OCCUR WITH THE USE OF THE DEVICE, IN THAT ¿ IF RESISTANCE IS MET, STOP AND RE-EVALUATE PROPLEGE DEVICE POSITION. THE PROPLEGE DEVICE SHOULD NOT BE ADVANCED IF RESISTANCE IS FELT, AS DOING SO WOULD CAUSE THE PROPLEGE DEVICE TO BEND OR BUCKLE. AGGRESSIVE ADVANCEMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO ENGAGE THE OSTIUM MAY RESULT IN PERFORATION OR OTHER INJURY.¿ ¿ONCE PLACED IN THE BODY, THE PROPLEGE DEVICE SHOULD BE MANIPULATED ONLY WHILE BEING OBSERVED USING FLUOROSCOPY AND/OR TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (TEE) AND WHILE MONITORING PRESSURE AT THE PROPLEGE DEVICE TIP.¿ ¿WARNING: AGGRESSIVE ADVANCEMENT OF THE GUIDEWIRE IN AN ATTEMPT TO ENGAGE THE OSTIUM MAY RESULT IN PERFORATION OR OTHER INJURY.¿ ¿ WARNING: OVERINFLATION MAY RESULT IN INJURY TO THE CORONARY SINUS. IF THE PATIENT BECOMES HEMODYNAMICALLY UNSTABLE, THE POSSIBILITY OF PERICARDIAL TAMPONADE MAY BE ASSESSED WITH APPROPRIATE TEE VIEWS.¿ IN THE REPORTED COMPLAINT THERE IS NO ALLEGATION THAT THE SURGEON DID NOT FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. IT IS PERCEIVED THAT THE PHYSICIAN DID AS INSTRUCTED BY THE IFU. IN THE TRAINING MATERIALS THERE IS SPECIFIC GUIDANCE TO IMAGING IN REGARDS TO NAVIGATING THE ANATOMY TO PREVENT INJURIES. IT ALSO ADDRESSES PLACEMENT TO SAFELY NAVIGATE THE VESSEL, ¿HOWEVER, THE DEVICE HAS TAKEN AN INCORRECT TRACK AND IS NOT IN THE CORONARY SINUS. INSTEAD, AS MARKED BY THE SOLID, SMALLER ARROW THE DEVICE TIP IS IN THE MIDDLE CARDIAC VEIN, THE MOST COMMONLY CANNULATED SIDE BRANCH. WHEN THE PROPLEGE DEVICE IS IN THE MIDDLE CARDIAC VEIN, DO NOT INFLATE THE BALLOON OR CONTINUE ADVANCEMENT AS THESE ACTIONS COULD POTENTIALLY LEAD TO VESSEL INJURY. ¿ THE IFU AND TRAINING MANUALS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND NO INADEQUACIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED WITH REGARDS TO WARNINGS, CONTRAINDICATIONS, AND THE DIRECTIONS/CONDITIONS FOR THE SUCCESSFUL USE OF THE DEVICE. REVIEW OF THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION INDICATES THAT THE EVENT REPORTED WAS NOT RELATED TO A MALFUNCTION OF THE PROPLEGE AND RELATED ONLY TO AN ADVERSE EVENT. COMPLAINT HISTORIES FOR ALL REPORTED EVENTS ARE REVIEWED AGAINST TRENDING CONTROL LIMITS ON A MONTHLY BASIS, AND ANY EXCURSIONS ABOVE THE CONTROL LIMITS ARE ASSESSED AND DOCUMENTED AS PART OF THIS MONTHLY REVIEW. NO CORRECTIVE OR PREVENTATIVE ACTIONS ARE REQUIRED.
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CLINICAL SPECIALIST THAT THERE WAS AN "EXTRAVASATION SEEN ON FLOUROSCOPY WHILE PLACING PROPLEGE CORONARY SINUS CATHETER. THE SURGEON AND ANESTHESIOLOGIST DISCONTINUED PLACING THE CATHETER AFTER OBSERVING THE EXTRAVASATION AND DECIDED TO PROCEDE WITH ANTEGRADE CARDIOPLEGIA ONLY. SURGEON ALSO COMMENTED THAT HE OBSERVED BRUISING ON THE RIGHT ATRIUM AND THOUGHT THE PATIENT MIGHT HAVE A DISECTION OF THE CORONARY SINUS. HE DECIDED NOT TO TREAT THE POSSIBLE CORONARY SINUS INJURY." THERE WAS NO STATED MALFUNCTION OF THE DEVICE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PROPLEGE CORONARY SINUS CATHETER | CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS | DWF | EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES | PR9 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other |