PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2012-07589
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 30, 2012
- Date of Event
- October 30, 2012
- Report Date
- November 16, 2012
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AZ, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE OTHER PERCLOSE PROGLIDE DEVICE IS BEING FILED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH MFR NUMBER. IT IS INDICATED THAT THE DEVICE IS NOT RETURNING FOR EVALUATION; THEREFORE, A FAILURE ANALYSIS OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE CANNOT BE COMPLETED. REVIEWS OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD AND COMPLAINT HISTORY OF THE REPORTED LOT COULD NOT BE CONDUCTED BECAUSE THE LOT NUMBER WAS NOT PROVIDED. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REVIEWED, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY.
(B)(4). IT WAS INITIALLY REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WOULD NOT BE RETURNED. SUBSEQUENT INFORMATION REVEALED THAT THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. EVALUATION SUMMARY: THE DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. BECAUSE ALL RELATED COMPONENTS WERE NOT RETURNED WITH THE DEVICE, THE SCOPE OF THIS INVESTIGATION WAS VERY LIMITED AND THE REPORTED CUFF MISS COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED. BASED ON VISUAL INSPECTION AND FUNCTIONAL TESTING OF THE RETURNED DEVICE, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD REVEALED NO NON-CONFORMANCES THAT WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EVENT. RESULTS OF THE QUERY OF SIMILAR INCIDENTS IN THE COMPLAINT-HANDLING DATABASE FROM THIS LOT DID NOT INDICATE A MANUFACTURING ISSUE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION REVIEWED, THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY WAS ATTEMPTED USING A PROGLIDE AFTER AN INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE. REPORTEDLY, A CUFF MISS OCCURRED. A SECOND PROGLIDE DEVICE WAS USED WITH THE SAME RESULTS. A NON-ABBOTT DEVICE WAS USED TO ACHIEVE HEMOSTASIS. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. THE PHYSICIAN IS REPORTED TO BE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE ENTIRE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
SUBSEQUENT TO THE INITIAL MEDWATCH FILED, USER FACILITY SUMMARY REPORT (REPORT #(B)(4)) 2 OF 3 PAGES RECEIVED: DESCRIBE THE EVENT PROBLEM]: "PERCLOSE PROGLIDE WAS ATTEMPTED X2 BUT THIS RESULTED IN FAILURE TO CAPTURE AND PULL SUTURES THROUGH. ULTIMATELY, PLACEMENT OF AN ANGIO-SEAL 8-FRENCH SYSTEM WAS EXECUTED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY AND HEMOSTASIS ACHIEVED." WHAT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTENDED PROCEDURE?: "RETROGRADE LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION, SELECTIVE CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; LEFT VENTRICULAR ANGIOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE RIGHT FEMORAL ARTERY WITH ATTEMPTED PERCLOSE. THIS HAS FAILED AND ULTIMATELY HEMOSTASIS ACHIEVED WITH ANGIO-SEAL DEVICE." NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 20928J1 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66 YR | Required Intervention |