RESTORE ULTRA
Report
- Report Number
- 3004209178-2012-10736
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- November 26, 2012
- Report Date
- November 9, 2012
- Manufacturer
- MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
- Product Code
- LGW
- PMA / PMN Number
- P840001
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- IL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
PRODUCT ID, NEU_TLOCK_ANCHOR, PRODUCT TYPE ACCESSORY PRODUCT ID, NEU_TLOCK _ANCHOR, PRODUCT TYPE ACCESSORY PRODUCT ID, 3778-60 LOT# SERIAL# (B)(4), IMPLANTED: 2008 (B)(6), PRODUCT TYPE LEAD PRODUCT ID, 3778-60 LOT# SERIAL# (B)(4), IMPLANTED: 2008 (B)(6), PRODUCT TYPE LEAD PRODUCT ID, 37752 LOT# SERIAL# (B)(4), IMPLANTED: 2008 (B)(6), PRODUCT TYPE RECHARGER PRODUCT ID, 37743 LOT# SERIAL# (B)(4), IMPLANTED: 2008 (B)(6), PRODUCT TYPE PROGRAMMER, PATIENT. (B)(4). ANALYSIS RESULTS WERE NOT AVAILABLE AS OF THE DATE OF THIS REPORT. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WHEN ANALYSIS IS COMPLETE.
IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.
FINAL DEVICE ANALYSIS OF THE NEUROSTIMULATOR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT ANOMALIES FOUND. THE BATTERY WAS OVER-DISCHARGED AND PERMANENTLY DAMAGED. FINAL DEVICE ANALYSIS OF THE LEAD #1 REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT ANOMALIES FOUND. THE BODY OF THE LEAD WAS SEGMENTED. FINAL DEVICE ANALYSIS OF THE LEAD #2 REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: THERE WERE NO SIGNIFICANT ANOMALIES FOUND. THE BODY OF THE LEAD WAS SEGMENTED. FINAL DEVICE ANALYSIS OF THE ANCHOR #1 REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES FOUND. FINAL DEVICE ANALYSIS OF THE ANCHOR #2 REVEALED THE FOLLOWING: THERE WERE NO ANOMALIES FOUND.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAD ISSUES COMMUNICATING AND COUPLING WITH HER IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR (INS). THE PATIENT STATED THAT SHE DID NOT NEED TO USE STIMULATION SO SHE HAD NOT CHARGED HER DEVICE FOR ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS. THE PATIENT WAS RECENTLY REAR ENDED IN A CAR ACCIDENT AND HER PAIN RETURNED SO SHE WANTED TO USE HER STIMULATION AGAIN. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INS WAS IN OVER DISCHARGE, AND THAT IT WAS THE PATIENT'S FIRST OVER DISCHARGE. TEN DAYS LATER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING HEADACHES BECAUSE OF THE CAR ACCIDENT, AND WAS GOING TO HAVE AN MRI ON HER HEAD REGION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INS WAS SUCCESSFULLY PULLED OUT OF OVER DISCHARGE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS NO PATIENT HOSPITALIZATION. THREE DAYS LATER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS FEELING PAIN AND A BURNING SENSATION AT THE INS LOCATION. IT WAS STATED THAT THE PREVIOUS FRIDAY, THE PATIENT HAD THE INS RECHARGED AND THE POWER-ON-RESET (POR) WAS CLEARED WITH THE CLINICIAN PROGRAMMER. AT THAT TIME, THE PATIENT HAD THERAPEUTIC STIMULATION. WHEN THE PAIN STARTED, THE PATIENT WAS INSTRUCTED TO TURN STIMULATION OFF, HOWEVER, THE SYMPTOMS PERSISTED. APPROXIMATELY ONE WEEK LATER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD DISCOMFORT AT THE INS SITE FROM CHARGING TWICE A DAY WHILE RETRAINING THE BATTERY TO HOLD A CHARGE. APPROXIMATELY 1.5 MONTHS LATER, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD THEIR SYSTEM EXPLANTED. IT WAS STATED THAT THE INS BECAME UNCOMFORTABLY HOT WHEN THE PATIENT WAS RECHARGING IT. THE PATIENT HAD TO CHARGE THE INS TWICE A DAY AFTER THE OVER-DISCHARGE. FURTHER INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT NONE WAS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED CLARIFIED THAT AS A RESULT OF THE DISCOMFORT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED WHILE RECHARGING FOLLOWING THE OVERDISCHARGE, THE PATIENT AND THE HCP DECIDED IT WOULD BE BEST TO EXPLANT THE SYSTEM.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RESTORE ULTRA | STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF | LGW | MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO | 37712 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |