OT VERIO IQ METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2012-13138
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- November 14, 2012
- Report Date
- October 31, 2012
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- PMA / PMN Number
- K110637
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PATIENT
Narratives
LIFESCAN (LFS) HAS REQUESTED RETURN OF THE SUBJECT PRODUCT(S) FOR EVALUATION. IF THE PRODUCT(S) ARE RETURNED, LFS WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT.
ON (B)(6) 2012, THE LAY USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) ALLEGING HIS ONETOUCH VERIOIQ METER WAS READING INACCURATELY COMPARED TO THE SAME METER. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA) DOCUMENTATION. ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT REPORTED THE ALLEGED ISSUE FIRST BEGAN. ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT ALLEGED OBTAINING READINGS OF "301MG/DL" AT 4:44AM AND "208MG/DL" AT 4:47AM. BASED ON STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, THE CALCULATED DIFFERENCE OF THESE READINGS EXCEEDS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF <=20% OR <=15MG/DL OBTAINED WITHIN 20 MINUTES OF EACH OTHER. ON (B)(6) 2012, THE PATIENT ALLEGED OBTAINING READINGS OF "263MG/DL" AT 1:53PM AND "117MG/DL" AT 1:58PM, ON THE LFS METER. BASED ON STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, THE CALCULATED DIFFERENCE OF THESE READINGS EXCEEDS THE EXPECTED RESULT OF <=20% OR <=15MG/DL OBTAINED WITHIN 20 MINUTES OF EACH OTHER. THE PATIENT REPORTED USING A COMBINATION OF MEDICATIONS INCLUDING METFORMIN, LANTUS AND JANUVIA (UNKNOWN DOSES) TO MANAGE HIS DIABETES. THE PATIENT REPORTED MAKING NO CHANGES TO HIS USUAL DIET, ACTIVITY LEVEL OR MEDICATIONS ON THE DAY OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. THE PATIENT REPORTED A FEW WEEKS LATER, HE FELT "TIRED." THE PATIENT REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2012, AT 2:45PM, HE WAS SEEN BY A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL FOR A BLOOD GLUCOSE TEST ONLY. A HBA1C READING OF "9.1%" WAS REPORTEDLY OBTAINED ON A LAB DRAW. THE PATIENT DID NOT REPORT ANY ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION FOR AN ACUTE COMPLICATION OF DIABETES. DURING THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING THE CCA CONFIRMED THE PATIENT WAS USING THE SAME APPROVED SAMPLE SITE TO OBTAIN THE SAMPLES. THE CCA NOTED THE SUBJECT METER WAS IN THE CORRECT UNIT OF MEASUREMENT DURING THE TIME OF TESTING. THE CCA DOCUMENTED THAT THE PATIENT'S TESTING PROCESS WAS CORRECT AND HER TEST STRIPS AND TEST STRIP VIAL WERE IN GOOD CONDITION. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT. THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THE SUBJECT METER CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO A SERIOUS INJURY. THE PATIENT'S REPORTED SYMPTOMS DO NOT MEET LFS' CRITERIA FOR A SERIOUS INJURY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REPORT ANY BLOOD GLUCOSE READINGS, SYMPTOMS OR TREATMENT SUGGESTIVE THAT AN ACUTE COMPLICATION OF DIABETES OCCURRED. HOWEVER, THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE ALLEGED ISSUE REMAINED UNRESOLVED WITH TROUBLESHOOTING DONE BY THE CCA.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT VERIO IQ METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN INC. |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |