ENDOSCOPIC LINEAR CUTTER
Report
- Report Number
- 3005075853-2012-04738
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- October 15, 2012
- Date of Event
- June 28, 2012
- Report Date
- September 24, 2012
- Manufacturer
- ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
- Product Code
- GDW
- PMA / PMN Number
- K020779
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- SW
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
(B)(4). PREMATURE SLED MOVEMENT, DAMAGED ONE PIECE SLED, DAMAGED CARTRIDGE. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED, BUT UNAVAILABLE: ON WHAT TISSUE TYPE WAS THE DEVICE USED? AT WHAT LOCATION ON THE TISSUE? WAS BUTTRESSING MATERIAL UTILIZED? IF SO, WHICH PRODUCT? WAS THE INSTRUMENT PLACED ACROSS OR NEAR AN EXISTING STAPLE LINE OR CLIP? WERE ANY UNEXPECTED NOISES HEARD? IF SO, WHEN? AFTER USE, DID EACH OF THE TRIGGERS AND BUTTONS AUTOMATICALLY RETURN TO THEIR ORIGINAL (PRE-FIRED) POSITIONS, WITHOUT INTERVENTION? WAS THERE ANY DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE TISSUE? IS THERE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE ABOUT THIS DEVICE OR PROCEDURE? THE ANALYSIS RESULTS FOUND THAT DEVICE A WAS RETURNED IN GOOD VISUAL CONDITION AND WITH NO RELOAD PRESENT ON THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS TESTED FOR FUNCTIONALITY WITH A TEST RELOAD AND IT FIRED, CUT AND FORMED THE STAPLES AS INTENDED. THE DEVICE FIRED WITHOUT ANY DIFFICULTIES, THE STAPLE LINE WAS COMPLETE, THE CUT LINE WAS COMPLETE AND THE STAPLES WERE NOTED TO HAVE THE PROPER B-FORMED SHAPE. EVENT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED AS NO CARTRIDGE WAS RECEIVED FOR ANALYSIS. THE BATCH RECORD WAS REVIEWED AND NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED DURING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS. THE ANALYSIS RESULTS FOUND THAT DEVICE B WAS RETURNED IN GOOD VISUAL CONDITION AND WITH NO RELOAD PRESENT ON THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS TESTED FOR FUNCTIONALITY WITH A TEST RELOAD AND IT FIRED, CUT AND FORMED THE STAPLES AS INTENDED. THE DEVICE FIRED WITHOUT ANY DIFFICULTIES, THE STAPLE LINE WAS COMPLETE, THE CUT LINE WAS COMPLETE AND THE STAPLES WERE NOTED TO HAVE THE PROPER B-FORMED SHAPE. EVENT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED AS NO CARTRIDGE WAS RECEIVED FOR ANALYSIS. THE BATCH RECORD WAS REVIEWED AND NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED DURING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS. (B)(4) (MFG DATE 09/23/09, EXP DATE 08/23/2014). THE ANALYSIS RESULTS FOUND THAT DEVICE C WAS RECEIVED WITH THE FIRING MECHANISM DAMAGED AND WITH A RELOAD LOADED IN THE DEVICE. THE RELOAD WAS RECEIVED FULLY FIRED AND WITH THE RELOAD LOCK OUT SPRING DAMAGED. THE DAMAGE TO THE RELOAD LOCKOUT SPRING IS CONSISTENT WITH DAMAGE OBSERVED WHEN THE FIRING CYCLE IS STARTED, INTERRUPTED, RELEASED, AND RESTARTED. WHEN FIRING THE DEVICE MAKE SURE THAT THE FIRING STROKE IS COMPLETED. DO NOT PARTIALLY FIRE THE DEVICE. FIRE THE DEVICE BY SQUEEZING THE FIRING TRIGGER COMPLETELY UNTIL IT RESTS ON THE CLOSING TRIGGER. ONCE THE FIRING CYCLE HAS BEEN INITIATED, IT MUST BE COMPLETED. IF RE-INITIATION OF FIRING IS RESUMED, THE DEVICE WILL LOCKOUT. FIRING THROUGH THE LOCKOUT MECHANISM WILL BREAK THE DEVICE. PLEASE REFERENCE THE INSTRUCTION FOR USE FOR MORE INFORMATION. NO FUNCTIONAL TEST COULD BE PERFORMED DUE TO THE CONDITION OF THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS DISASSEMBLED TO VERIFY THE CONDITION OF THE INTERNAL COMPONENTS AND THE FIRING TRIGGER TEETH WERE FOUND BROKEN. WHILE NO CONCLUSION COULD BE REACH ON WHAT CAUSE THE FIRING MECHANISM TO FAIL, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE DEVICE WAS ATTEMPTED TO FIRE ON TICKER TISSUE THEN INDICATED OR ATTEMPTED TO FIRE TROUGH A LOCKED RELOAD IN PREVIOUS FIRINGS CAUSING AN INCREASE OF THE INTERNAL FORCES RESULTING IN THE COMPONENT YIELDING. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT A 100% INSPECTIONS TAKES PLACE DURING MANUFACTURING TO ENSURE THE DEVICE MEETS THE REQUIRED SPECIFICATIONS; IN ADDITION, A SAMPLE OF THE BATCH IS INSPECTED AT (B)(4). THE BATCH RECORD WAS REVIEWED AND NO ANOMALIES WERE NOTED DURING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS. (B)(4) (MFG DATE 09/23/09, EXP DATE 08/23/2014).
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A ZENKERS DIVERTICLE PROCEDURE, (IN THE ENT DEPARTMENT) THEY WERE ABOUT TO STAPLE THE DIVERTICLE, BUT THEY COULD NOT FIRE IT. THEY TOOK ANOTHER STAPLER BUT STILL DID NOT WORK, AND THE SAME WITH THE THIRD STAPLER. THEY TOOK ANOTHER STAPLER, THE FOURTH, AND THAT WORKED. SURGERY WAS PROLONGED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PATIENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ENDOSCOPIC LINEAR CUTTER | STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE | GDW | ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. | NA | G4RF6U |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |