NOVOFINE 30
Report
- Report Number
- 9681821-2000-00009
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- May 10, 2000
- Date of Event
- March 22, 2000
- Report Date
- April 25, 2000
- Manufacturer
- NOVO NORDISK A/S
- Product Code
- FMI
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NJ, US
- Reporter Occupation
- UNKNOWN
Narratives
BROKEN NEEDLE IN ABDOMEN (NEEDLE INJURY). CASE DESCRIPTION: A BECTON DICKINSON REP REPORTED THAT A PT HAD AN INSULIN NEEDLE BREAK OFF IN ABDOMEN, WHICH REQUIRED SURGICAL REMOVAL. THE REP STATED THAT WHEN BECTON DICKINSON RECEIVED THE NEEDLE HUB FROM THE PT, THE CO DETERMINED THAT IT WAS NOT THEIR PRODUCT BECAUSE IT HAD A WHITE PLASTIC HUB AND THEIR NEEDLES HAVE A CLEAR PLASTIC HUB. IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE PT, PT REPORTED THAT ON 22-MAR-2000 THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF IN ABDOMEN AND SHORTLY AFTERWARD PT WENT TO A CLINIC TO HAVE THE NEEDLE REMOVED. THE SAME DAY A FLUOROSCOPY WAS PERFORMED TO LOCATE THE NEEDLE, WHICH WAS THEN SURGICALLY REMOVED FROM THE SUBCUTANEOUS FAT IN PT ABDOMEN. A NURSE AT THE CLINIC STATED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS DONE ON AN OUTPATIENT BASIS AND THE PT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED. THE PT STATED THAT ALTHOUGH A PRESCRIPTION (MEDICATION NOT SPECIFIED) WAS WRITTEN, PT DID NOT TAKE ANY ANTIBIOTICS AFTER THE SURGERY BECAUSE PT DOES NOT HAVE INSURANCE. PT REPORTED THAT THEY HAVE SINCE SWITCHED TO USING CONVENTIONAL SYRINGES. THE PT STATED THAT THEY DO NOT REUSE THE NEEDLES.
BROKEN NEEDLE IN ABDOMEN [NEEDLE INJURY] CASE DESCRIPTION: A BECTON DICKINSON REP REPORTED THAT A PT HAD A INSULIN BREAK OFF IN HER ABDOMEN, WHICH REQUIRED SURGICAL REMOVAL. THE REP STATED THAT WHEN BECTON DICKINSON RECEIVED THE NEEDLE HUB FROM THE PT, THE CO DETERMINED THAT IT WAS NOT THEIR PRODUCT BECAUSE IT HAD A WHITE PLASTIC HUB AND THEIR NEEDLES HAVE A CLEAR PLASTIC HUB. IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE PT, PT REPORTED THAT ON 3/22/2000 THE NEEDLE BROKE OFF IN HER ABDOMEN AND SHORTLY AFTERWARD PT WENT TO A CLINIC TO HAVE THE NEEDLE REMOVED. THE SAME DAY A FLUOROSCOPY WAS PERFORMED TO LOCATE THE NEEDLE, WHICH WAS THEN SURGICALLY REMOVED FROM THE SUBCUTANEOUS FAT IN ABDOMEN. A NURSE AT THE CLINIC STATED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS DONE ON AN OUTPATIENT BASIS AND THE PT WAS NOT HOSPITALIZED. THE PT STATED THAT ALTHOUGH A PRESCRIPTION (MEDICATION NOT SPECIFIED) WAS WRITTEN, PT DID NOT TAKE ANY ANTIBIOTICS AFTER THE SURGERY BECAUSE PT DOES NOT HAVE INSURANCE. PT REPORTED THAT PT HAS SINCE SWITCHED TO USING CONVENTIONAL SYRINGES. PT STATED THAT PT DOES NOT REUSE THE NEEDLES. FOLLOW-UP INFO ON 5/8/2000: IN A POSTOPERATIVE REPORT, THE PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THE PT PRESENTED WITH A BROKEN INSULIN NEEDLE IN RIGHT, LOWER QUADRANT ABDOMINAL WALL. PT REQUESTED THAT THE NEEDLE BE REMOVED SINCE IT WAS CAUSING PAIN. THE PHYSICIAN DISCUSSED THE RISKS OF REMOVING THE NEEDLE, I.E., RISK OF INFECTION, BLEEDING, HEALING PROBLEMS, OR NOT FINDING THE NEEDLE, THEN PROCEEDED WITH THE PROCEDURE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NOVOFINE 30 | NEEDLE | FMI | NOVO NORDISK A/S | NA | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 YR | Required Intervention | 1. NOVOPEN 1.5 (INSULIN DELIVERY DEVICE) NA UNK TO| 3. PROZAC (FLUOXETINE HYDROCHLORIDE) UNK TO UNK.| UNK 2. HUMALOG (INSULIN LISPRO) UNK TO UNK, |