UNKNOWN
Report
- Report Number
- 1835959-2012-00011
- Event Type
- Death
- Date Received
- September 21, 2012
- Report Date
- September 21, 2012
- Manufacturer
- COOK BIOTECH
- Product Code
- FTL
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA
- Reporter Occupation
- UNKNOWN
Narratives
PMA/501 K UNK AT THIS TIME AS SPECIFIC DEVICE USED IS UNK. EC METHOD CODE DESC -1- DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. ATTEMPTS IN PROCESS AT GATHERING ADDITIONAL DETAILS SURROUNDING EACH REPORTED OUTCOME AND TO IDENTIFY SPECIFIC PRODUCT USED. INVESTIGATION INTO THIS REPORT IS ONGOING. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 8-12 WEEKS WITH FURTHER DETAILS AS TO THE FINDINGS OF THIS INVESTIGATION, BASED ON INFORMATION AVAILABLE, INCLUDING SPECIFIC DEVICE(S) USED.
BACKGROUND: PROSTHETIC PATCHES ARE WIDELY USED FOR CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA(CDH) REPAIR. WE COMPARED THE COMPLICATION RATE OF ABSORBABLE (SURGISIS [SIS]; COOK BIOTECH, INC, (B)(4)) AND NONABSORBABLE (POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE [PTFE]) MATERIALS FOR THIS PURPOSE. METHODS: THIS IS A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF ALL NEONATES WITH CDH UNDERGOING PATCH CLOSURE AT OUR INSTITUTION OVER 10 YEARS. META-ANALYSIS WAS ALSO PERFORMED COMBINING OUR DATA WITH THE PUBLISHED LITERATURE EXAMINING THE EFFECT OF PATCH TYPE ON RECURRENCE AND SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION (SBO). (B)(4) 2012 - AT THIS TIME, WE DO NOT KNOW ANY FURTHER INFORMATION THAN THE FOLLOWING THAT WAS AVAILABLE IN THE PAPER: RECURRENCE RATE (SIS, 4 [31%]; PTFE, 3[33%]; P, NONSIGNIFICANT [NS]), INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE SBO (SIS, 1 [7%] VS PTFE, 2[22%]; P, NS), AND MORTALITY (SIS, 2[15%] AND PTFE, 2[22%]; P, NS). RESULTS: PRIMARY PATCH (13 SIS, 9 PTFE) REPAIR WAS PERFORMED IN 22 (26%) OF 84 PTS WITH CDH. GROUPS WERE COMPARABLE IN TERMS OF DEMOGRAPHICS, HOSPITAL STAY, VENTILATOR DAYS, NEED FOR HIGH FREQUENCY OSCILLATION, AGE AT SURGERY, AND LENGTH OF FOLLOW-UP. LIKEWISE, RECURRENCE RATE (SIS, 4 [31%]; PTFE, 3[33%]; P, NONSIGNIFICANT [NS]), INCIDENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE SBO (SIS, 1[7%] VS PTFE, 2[22%]; P, NS), AND MORTALITY (SIS, 2[15%] AND PTFE, 2[22%]; P, NS) WERE SIMILAR. META-ANALYSIS FAILED TO FIND A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SIS AND PTFE BOTH FOR RECURRENCE RATE (ODDS RATIO, 1.21 [0.51-2.84]; P, NS) AND SBO (ODDS RATIO, 1.47 [0.44-4.96]; P, NS). CONCLUSIONS: THERE WAS NO DIFFERENCE IN THE INCIDENCE OF CDH RECURRENCE, SBO, OR MORTALITY POST-CDH PATCH REPAIR USING EITHER SIS OR PTFE IN OUR SERIES. META-ANALYSIS FAILED TO SHOW ANY DIFFERENCE IN RECURRENCE ANS SBO RATES BETWEEN THE 2 MATERIALS.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UNKNOWN | NONE | FTL | COOK BIOTECH | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Death| H| L| R |