VERSACUT MORCELLATOR
Report
- Report Number
- 3004135191-2012-00043
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- July 3, 2012
- Date of Event
- June 7, 2012
- Report Date
- August 15, 2012
- Manufacturer
- LUMENIS, LTD.
- Product Code
- GCJ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K980079
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AZ, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
THE SUBJECT DEVICE WAS RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURING SITE AND AN EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE WAS COMPLETED BY A LUMENIS ENGINEER. THE LUMENIS ENGINEER FOUND THAT THE SUBJECT DEVICE MOTOR WAS STUCK AND WOULD NOT ROTATE BY HAND. THE ENGINEER NOTED THAT THE MOTOR ASSEMBLY O-RING WAS MISSING IN THE MOTOR HOUSING. ALL OTHER PERFORMANCE TESTS FOUND THE COMPONENTS OF THE SUBJECT DEVICE TO BE FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. THE ENGINEER CONCLUDED THE CAUSE OF THE MOTOR FAILURE TO BE HEATING OR MOISTURE FROM AUTOCLAVE STERILIZATION THAT PENETRATED THE MOTOR AS A RESULT OF THE MISSING O-RING. AN M.D. AND EXPERT IN HOLEP PROCEDURES EVALUATED THE REPORTED EVENT DETAILS CONCLUDING THAT, "IF THE HANDPIECE STOPS WORKING THEN THE PATIENT IS IN NO IMMEDIATE DANGER. THEY WILL HAVE TO HAVE A SECOND PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE TISSUE OR A SMALL CYSTOTOMY (SMALL INCISION IN THE BLADDER) TO REMOVE THE TISSUE." ADDITIONALLY, THE M.D. STATED THAT, "OUR STANDARD OF PRACTICE IS TO ALWAYS TEST THE MORCELLATOR PRIOR TO THE START OF EACH PROCEDURE TO ENSURE THAT THIS DOES NOT OCCUR. AN ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE TO MAKE SURE THE HOSPITAL ALWAYS HAS A BACKUP UNIT IN WORKING ORDER." A REVIEW OF LABELING FOUND NO RELATED DEVIATIONS. A REVIEW OF RECORDS FOUND THAT NO SIMILAR EVENTS HAD BEEN REPORTED AND REVIEW OF RISK CONCLUDED THE EVENT IS WITHIN ACCEPTABLE STATISTICAL LIMITS. LUMENIS CONCLUDES THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE REPORTED EVENT (PATIENT REQUIRED A SECOND SURGERY TO COMPLETE THE HOLEP PROCEDURE) TO BE MANUFACTURING DEFICIENCY.
LUMENIS INVESTIGATED THE INITIAL REPORT CONTACTING THE DEVICE OPERATOR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. THE DEVICE OPERATOR STATED THAT, "NO COMORBID CONDITIONS OF THE PATIENT'S CONTRIBUTED" TO THE EVENT REPORTED. THE CASE WAS REPORTED TO HAVE BEEN COMPLETED WITH NO SUBSEQUENT ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT. THE SUBJECT DEVICE HAS BEEN SHIPPED TO THE MANUFACTURING SITE FOR EXAMINATION. LUMENIS WILL FILE A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH REPORT UPON COMPLETION OF THE EXAMINATION OF THE SUBJECT DEVICE AND DETERMINATION OF THE CAUSE OF THE EVENT.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A HOLEP PROCEDURE IN WHICH A LUMENIS VERSACUT MORCELLATOR WAS USED, THE SUBJECT DEVICE FAILED TO FUNCTION AS EXPECTED. THE DOCTOR REPORTED THAT THE MORCELLATOR HANDPIECE WOULD NOT RECIPROCATE THE BLADE. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS RESCHEDULED FOR A SECOND SURGERY TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VERSACUT MORCELLATOR | COHERENT TISSUE MORCELLATOR KIT AND ACCESSORIES | GCJ | LUMENIS, LTD. | VERSACUT MORCELLATOR HANDPIECE |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65 YR | Required Intervention |