FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

NEUROSTIMULATOR

MDR report key: 2539536 · Received April 18, 2012

Report

Report Number
3007566237-2012-00804
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
April 18, 2012
Date of Event
September 1, 2011
Report Date
April 3, 2012
Manufacturer
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
Product Code
MHY
PMA / PMN Number
P960009
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
FL, US
Reporter Occupation
PHYSICIAN

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

(B)(4). THE ACTUAL EVENT DATES WERE NOT PROVIDED. THIS DATE IS BASED ON THE DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE ARTICLE. IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ASCERTAIN SPECIFIC DEVICE INFORMATION FROM THE ARTICLE OR TO MATCH THE EVENTS REPORTED WITH PREVIOUSLY REPORTED EVENTS.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

LITERATURE: DBS CANDIDATES THAT FALL SHORT ON A LEVODOPA CHALLENGE TEST ALTERNATIVE AND IMPORTANT INDICATIONS. TAKASHI MORISHITA, MD, PHD,* MARYAM RAHMAN, MD, MS,* KELLY D. FOOTE, MD, KYLE M. FARGEN, MD, MPH,* CHARLES E. JACOBSON IV, BS,W HUBERT H. FERNANDEZ, MD, RAMON L. RODRIGUEZ, MD,W IRENE A. MALATY, MD,W DAWN BOWERS, PHD,Y CHRISTOPHER J. HASS, PHD, YOICHI KATAYAMA, MD, PHD, TAKAMITSU YAMAMOTO, MD, PHD,Z# AND MICHAEL S. OKUN, MD. THE NEUROLOGIST, VOLUME 17, NUMBER 5, SEPTEMBER 2011. DOI: 10.1097/NRL.0B013E31822D1069. ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: CANDIDACY FOR DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION (DBS) IN PARKINSON DISEASE (PD) IS TYPICALLY ASSESSED BY THE PREOPERATIVE MOTOR RESPONSE TO LEVODOPA ALONG WITH AN INTERDISCIPLINARY EVALUATION. HOWEVER, RECENT CASES TREATED AT OUR INSTITUTION HAVE ACHIEVED GOOD OUTCOMES WITH DBS DESPITE A SUB-30% IMPROVEMENT IN MOTOR SCORES. THE AIM OF THIS STUDY WAS TO EXAMINE THE OUTCOMES OF DBS IN A SUBSET OF PATIENTS WHO FAILED TO REACH THE 30% MOTOR IMPROVEMENT THRESHOLD. METHODS: A REVIEW OF ALL DBS PATIENTS TREATED AT THE (B)(6) BETWEEN 2002 AND 2009 WAS PERFORMED UTILIZING A DBS DATABASE. ALL PATIENTS WITH SUB-30% IMPROVEMENT IN UNIFIED PARKINSON DISEASE RATING SCALE PART III AFTER DOPAMINERGIC MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION WERE INCLUDED. RESULTS: NINE PATIENTS WERE IDENTIFIED; DBS WAS PERFORMED FOR SEVERE DYSKINESIA (N = 5), "ON/OFF MOTOR" FLUCTUATIONS (N = 1) AND MEDICATION REFRACTORY TREMOR (N = 3). THE TARGET SYMPTOMS WERE IMPROVED IN ALL PATIENTS. POSTOPERATIVELY, SCORES ON THE UNIFIED PARKINSON DISEASE RATING SCALE PART II AND III AND SUBSCORES ON PARKINSON DISEASE QUESTIONNAIRE-39 IMPROVED (P <(><<)> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: ALTHOUGH MOTOR RESPONSE TO LEVODOPA REMAINS THE PRIMARY SELECTION CRITERIA FOR DBS CANDIDACY IN PARKINSON DISEASE, PATIENTS WHO DO NOT MEET THE 30% THRESHOLD AND HAVE DISABLING SYMPTOMS MAY STILL BENEFIT FROM DBS. SELECT PATIENTS WITH SEVERE DYSKINESIA, "ON/OFF" MOTOR FLUCTUATIONS, AND/OR MEDICATION-REFRACTORY TREMOR MAY EXPERIENCE SIGNIFICANT BENEFITS FROM DBS AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS THROUGH AN INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAM EVALUATION. REPORTED EVENT: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN INTRA-CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE (12 MM^3) AROUND THE STN. THE HEMORRHAGE RESULTED IN A TRANSIENT HEMIPARESIS THAT HAD RESOLVED WHEN THE PATIENT RETURNED FOR THE NEUROSTIMULATOR IMPLANTATION 4 WEEKS LATER. FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED; A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS RECEIVED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 NEUROSTIMULATOR STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN TREMOR MHY MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION NEU_INS_STIMULATOR

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 00070 YR Other LEAD: MODEL UNK, IMPLANT: UNK, EXPLANT: UNK