FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

MICRUS MICROCOIL SYSTEM

MDR report key: 2475196 · Received February 29, 2012

Report

Report Number
2954740-2012-00015
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
February 29, 2012
Date of Event
February 1, 2012
Report Date
February 6, 2012
Manufacturer
MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR CORPORATION
Product Code
MJN
PMA / PMN Number
K091504
Adverse Event
Yes
Product Problem
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
MD, US
Reporter Occupation
PHYSICIAN

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

DEVICE REPORTED: (B)(4); LOT# G14972; MFG DATE; 09/2011; EXPIRATION DATE: 09/30/2016. PRODUCT ANALYSIS: DEVICE 1 (B)(4): THE COIL WAS RETURNED UNDAMAGED AND STILL ATTACHED TO THE DEVICE POSITIONING UNIT (DPU). THE COIL WAS REPORTED AS PROTRUDING OUT OF THE ANEURYSM AND WAS SNARED. HOWEVER IT CANNOT BE EXPLAINED HOW THE COIL WAS RETURNED STILL FULLY ATTACHED TO THE DPU. THE DETACHMENT FIBER DID NOT RECEIVE HEAT AND MELT. THE DPU PASSED ELECTRICAL TESTING. THE COIL WAS DETACHED ON THE FIRST DETACHMENT ATTEMPT. LAB TESTING COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE FIELD COMPLAINT. DEVICE 2 (B)(4): THE DAMAGED COIL WAS RETURNED SEVERED OUT OF THE SOLDERED SECTION WHICH REQUIRED EXCESSIVE FORCE. THE PROXIMAL END OF THE COIL WAS STILL FULLY ATTACHED TO THE DEVICE POSITIONING UNIT (DPU). THE DPU PASSED ELECTRICAL TESTING. THE PROXIMAL END OF THE COIL DETACHED ON THE FIRST DETACHMENT ATTEMPT. THE DETACHMENT FIBER RECEIVED HEAT AND MELTED AS DESIGNED. LAB TESTING COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE FIELD COMPLAINT. THE EVIDENCE DOES SUGGEST THAT THE KNOTTED COIL AT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE COIL MAY HAVE PULLED THE COIL MASS AND/OR THE OTHER COIL THAT PROLAPSED OUT OF THE ANEURYSM DURING REPOSITIONING. HOWEVER, THE OTHER COIL CONTAINED IN THIS COMPLAINT WAS STILL FULLY ATTACHED TO THE DPU WHICH CANNOT BE EXPLAINED. THE EXACT CIRCUMSTANCES OF HOW THIS EVENT OCCURRED CANNOT BE DETERMINED. IN ADDITION, WITHOUT THE RETURN OF THE COMPLETE DETACHMENT SYSTEM AND THE PROWLER 14 MICROCATHETER USED IN THE PROCEDURE, IT CANNOT BE DETERMINED IF THESE COMPONENTS CONTRIBUTED TO THE COMPLAINT EVENT.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

PER RECEIVED REPORT: AS THE TWO (2) COILS WERE PLACED AND DETACHMENT WAS ATTEMPTED, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE COIL DIDN'T PROPERLY DETACH AND WERE PROLAPSING OUT OF THE ANEURYSM INTO THE PT ARTERY WITH THE DEVICE POSITIONING UNIT (DPU) AND PORTION OF THE COIL STILL IN THE MICROCATHETER. AT THAT POINT, SNARE WAS USED TO SECURE THE COIL MASS ALONG WITH THE MICROCATHETER AND BOTH COILS WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PT WITHOUT ANY ISSUE. NO PT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 MICRUS MICROCOIL SYSTEM EMBOLIC COIL MJN MICRUS ENDOVASCULAR CORPORATION G13895

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 Required Intervention