Description of Event or Problem · 1
AN E-MAIL WAS RECEIVED FROM (B)(6) OF THE (B)(6) MEDICAL CENTER. IN A SUBSEQUENT PHONE CALL ON JUNE 26, MR. (B)(6) SHARED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: THE CARE GIVERS IN THE ICU PLACED A SYNCRO-BLUETUBE IN A (B)(6) MALE PATIENT ON JUNE 17. AFTER PLACEMENT A CONFIRMING X-RAY WAS TAKEN AND THE TUBE WAS SHOWN TO NOT BE IN THE CORRECT POSITION (NOT A DUODENAL PLACEMENT). A SECOND INSERTION WAS ATTEMPTED AND A SECOND X-RAY WAS TAKEN. THIS X-RAY CONFIRMED DUODENAL PLACEMENT OF THE TUBE. ENTERAL FEEDING WAS INITIATED AT A RATE OF 10 ML PER HOUR, AND WAS CONTINUED INTERMITTENTLY THROUGHOUT THE DAY. TWO DAYS LATER, THE PATIENT WAS COMPLAINING OF ABDOMINAL PAIN AND A GASTROGRAFFIN PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED (DYE/CONTRAST WAS USED) TO OBTAIN VISUALIZATION OF THE ABDOMEN. THE GASTROGRAFFIN SHOWED THE TIP OF THE FEEDING TUBE TO BE EXTRA-LUMINAL. THE PATIENT WAS SENT TO THE OPERATING ROOM ON THE MORNING OF THE 20TH, THE PERFORATION WAS REPAIRED AND THE PATIENT IS DOING FINE. NO ADDITIONAL COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED. IN A SUBSEQUENT CONVERSATION, MR. (B)(6) REPORTED THAT IN THEIR OPINION, THE INCIDENT WAS NOT PRODUCT RELATED.