BEUDAMED
    FDA Adverse Event Malfunction Summary report: N

    PERITX DRAINAGE BAG KIT

    MDR report key: 23842285 · Received December 18, 2025

    Report

    Report Number
    1423507-2025-00180
    Event Type
    Malfunction
    Date Received
    December 18, 2025
    Date of Event
    November 25, 2025
    Report Date
    March 3, 2026
    Manufacturer
    CAREFUSION, INC
    Product Code
    PNG
    UDI-DI
    10885403222412
    PMA / PMN Number
    SEE H.11.
    Product Problem
    Yes
    Report Source
    Manufacturer report
    Reporter Location
    CA
    Reporter Occupation
    OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
    Health Professional
    Yes

    Narratives

    Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

    H11: THE LOT NUMBER FOR THE DEVICE WAS PROVIDED. THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS ARE CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW. THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED, BUT A VIDEO WAS PROVIDED FOR REVIEW; VIDEO REVIEW IS UNDERWAY. THE INVESTIGATION IS CURRENTLY UNDERWAY. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE FILED. B3 (DATE OF EVENT) THE ACTUAL DATE OF EVENT IS UNKNOWN. THE DATE RECEIVED BY MANUFACTURER (AWARENESS DATE) WAS ENTERED INTO THE DATE OF EVENT FIELD. D2B: PRO CODE: DWM; PNG, G4: PMA/510(K) #: K122422; K160437; K201155; K241946. SECTION A THROUGH F ¿ THE INFORMATION PROVIDE BY BD REPRESENTS ALL THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT/REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BD.

    Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 0

    H11: ONE VIDEO AND ONE PHOTO WERE PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER FOR THE LEAKAGE REPORTED FAILURE MODE ASSESSMENT. A VISUAL INSPECTION WAS PERFORMED ON BOTH THE IMAGE AND THE VIDEO RECEIVED. DURING THE EVALUATION, THE VIDEO CLEARLY SHOWED A BAG LEAKING FLUID THROUGH THE MAIN PORT AREA. THE LEAK APPEARED TO ORIGINATE AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN THE BAG¿S SEAL AND THE TUBING TO PORT ASSEMBLY. THE PHOTO PROVIDED SHOWED MULTIPLE UNUSED PRODUCTS INSIDE THEIR ORIGINAL POUCHES WHICH MATCHED THE REPORTED MATERIAL AND LOT NUMBER INFORMATION. BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND THE VISUAL INSPECTION PERFORMED, THE REPORTED FAILURE MODE WAS CONFIRMED. NO ADDITIONAL PRODUCT HANDLING OR MISUSE SIGNALS WERE IDENTIFIED FROM THE MATERIALS RECEIVED. THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTED THAT THE LEAK OCCURRED AT THE SEALING/CONNECTION INTERFACE AS OBSERVED IN THE VIDEO. ADDITIONALLY, A TOTAL OF FIFTEEN PHYSICAL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED BY OUR QUALITY TEAM AND EVALUATED. DURING THE VISUAL INSPECTION, ALL RETURNED SAMPLES WERE FOUND UNUSED AND SEALED IN THEIR ORIGINAL POUCHES. THROUGH THE PACKAGE LABELING, IT WAS POSSIBLE TO VERIFY THE PRODUCT AND LOT NUMBER. FUNCTIONAL TESTING WAS PERFORMED ON THE SAMPLES IN AN EFFORT TO REPLICATE THE LEAK CONDITION REPORTED. OF THE FIFTEEN SAMPLES TESTED, THREE FAILED THE LEAK TEST. THE AFFECTED BAGS EXHIBITED BUBBLE FORMATION AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN THE BAG TUBING CONNECTION AND THE MAIN PORT, CONSISTENT WITH THE FAILURE MECHANISM PREVIOUSLY REPORTED. BASED ON THE VISUAL INSPECTION AND THE FUNCTIONAL LEAK TESTING PERFORMED, THE FAILURE MODE WAS CONFIRMED. THE OBSERVED DEFECT ORIGINATES AT THE TUBING TO PORT CONNECTION INTERFACE. CONSIDERING THAT THESE BAGS ARE PURCHASED COMPONENTS SUPPLIED BY AN EXTERNAL VENDOR, THE FAILURE IS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE SUPPLIER PROVIDED COMPONENT RATHER THAN AN INTERNAL MANUFACTURING PROCESS. THE COMPONENT IS NOT PHYSICALLY NOR CHEMICALLY CHANGED; IT IS ONLY MANUALLY PLACED IN THE PROCEDURE PACK. A FORMAL INVESTIGATION WAS OPENED TO FURTHER INVESTIGATE THESE DEFECTS TO ENHANCE PROCESS ROBUSTNESS AND PREVENT RECURRENCE. A REVIEW OF THE INTERNAL MANUFACTURING DEVICE RECORD AND RAW MATERIAL HISTORY FILES FOR THE REPORTED LOT NUMBER WAS PERFORMED AND NO RECORDED QUALITY PROBLEMS OR REJECTIONS RELATED TO THIS INCIDENT WERE FOUND. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT PROCEDURAL AND FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS NEEDED FOR ITS RELEASE WERE MET. D9 (DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION; RECEIVED TO MANUFACTURER ON), G3 (DATE RECEIVED BY MANUFACTURER), G6 TYPE OR REPORT - FOLLOW UP# 1), H2 (CORRECTION, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND DEVICE EVALUATION), H3 (DEVICE EVAL BY MANUFACTURER?), H6: ANNEX G (COMPONENT CODE), ANNEX B (TYPE OF INVESTIGATION), ANNEX C (INVESTIGATION FINDINGS), ANNEX D (INVESTIGATION CONCLUSIONS). SECTION A THROUGH F ¿ THE INFORMATION PROVIDE BY BD REPRESENTS ALL THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT/REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BD.

    Description of Event or Problem · 0

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOUR PERITX BAGS WERE LEAKING AT THE SEALED GASKET. IT WAS ALSO MENTIONED THAT THE PACKS ARE LEAKING AT THE SEALED GASKET AND SPOUT CONNECTION. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Description of Event or Problem · 0

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT FOUR PERITX BAGS WERE LEAKING AT THE SEALED GASKET. IT WAS ALSO MENTIONED THAT THE PACKS ARE LEAKING AT THE SEALED GASKET AND SPOUT CONNECTION. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED.

    Devices

    Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
    2385967 PERITX DRAINAGE BAG KIT PERITONEAL, DRAINAGE CATHETER FOR REFRACTORY ASCITES, LONG-TERM INDWELLING PNG CAREFUSION, INC 0001626386 10885403222412

    Patients

    Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
    1 NA Unknown