PDS II POLYDIOXANONE SUTURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Report
- Report Number
- 2210968-2025-13630
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- December 4, 2025
- Date of Event
- March 20, 2025
- Report Date
- December 4, 2025
- Manufacturer
- ETHICON INC.
- Product Code
- NEW
- PMA / PMN Number
- N18331
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JA
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
PRODUCT COMPLAINT # (B)(4). THIS REPORT IS BEING SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF 21 CFR, PART 803. THIS REPORT MAY BE BASED ON INFORMATION WHICH HAS NOT BEEN INVESTIGATED OR VERIFIED PRIOR TO THE REQUIRED REPORTING DATE. THIS REPORT DOES NOT REFLECT A CONCLUSION BY ETHICON INC, OR ITS EMPLOYEES THAT THE REPORT CONSTITUTES AN ADMISSION THAT THE PRODUCT, ETHICON INC OR ITS EMPLOYEES CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POTENTIAL EVENT DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL REPORT, A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE. ATTEMPTS ARE BEING MADE TO OBTAIN THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION. TO DATE NO RESPONSE HAS BEEN PROVIDED. IF FURTHER DETAILS ARE RECEIVED AT A LATER DATE A SUPPLEMENTAL MEDWATCH WILL BE SENT. DOES THE SURGEON BELIEVE THAT ANY OF THE ETHICON PRODUCTS INVOLVED CAUSED AND/OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS DESCRIBED IN THE ARTICLE? WHICH SPECIFIC ETHICON PRODUCTS HAVE BEEN USED DURING THE PROCEDURES (PRODUCT CODE, LOT NUMBER)? DOES THE SURGEON BELIEVE THERE WAS ANY DEFICIENCY WITH ANY OF THE ETHICON PRODUCTS USED IN THIS PROCEDURE? IF SO, PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. WERE THE CASES DISCUSSED IN THIS ARTICLE PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO ETHICON? IF YES, PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLAINT REFERENCE NUMBER. PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS? THIS REPORT IS RELATED TO A JOURNAL ARTICLE; THEREFORE, NO PRODUCT WILL BE RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS AND THE BATCH HISTORY RECORDS CANNOT BE REVIEWED AS THE LOT NUMBER HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THE SINGLE COMPLAINT WAS REPORTED WITH MULTIPLE EVENTS. THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL DETAILS REGARDING THE ADDITIONAL EVENTS. D4: UDI: AS THE CATALOG/MODEL NUMBER WAS NOT PROVIDED, THE (B)(4) IS NOT AVAILABLE. CITATION: WORLD J SURG ONCOL. 2025 MAR 20;23(1):97. HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.1186/S12957-025-03737-X. PMID: 40114143; PMCID: PMC11924735.
TITLE: SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY FOR HEPATOPANCREATODUODENECTOMY COMPARED TO PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY FOR PERIHILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA. THE AIM OF THIS MULTI-CENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY WAS TO INVESTIGATE AND COMPARE THE SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES OF PANCREATICOGASTROSTOMY (PG) AND PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY (PJ) FOR HEPATOPANCREATODUODENECTOMY (HPD) IN TERMS OF THE POSTOPERATIVE PANCREATIC FISTULA (POPF) RATE. BETWEEN JANUARY 2013 AND JANUARY 2024, A TOTAL OF 50 PATIENTS (13 WERE FEMALES; MEAN AGE WAS 74 (50¿82) YEARS) WHO UNDERWENT HPD FOR PERIHILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA WERE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY. THE PG AND PJ GROUPS COMPRISED 15 (30.0%) AND 35 (70.0%) PATIENTS, RESPECTIVELY. IN THE PG RECONSTRUCTION, A 4-0 POLYDIOXANONE SUTURES (PDS II, ETHICON) WAS USED TO SUTURE THE PANCREATIC PARENCHYMA AND THE STOMACH INTO A WHOLE LAYER. AFTER CLOSING THE ANTERIOR WALL OF THE STOMACH VIA LAYER-TO-LAYER ANASTOMOSIS USING 4-0 PDF, THE FIRST 3-0 MONOFILAMENT POLYPROPYLENE THREAD WAS SUTURED TO THE POSTERIOR STOMACH WALL AND FIXED. REPORTED COMPLICATIONS INCLUDED POSTOPERATIVE BILE LEAKAGE (N=2) AND POSTOPERATIVE ARTERY BLEEDING (N=1). IN CONCLUSION, CHANGING THE METHOD OF PANCREATIC RECONSTRUCTION FROM PJ TO PG FOR HPD IMPROVED THE SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES IN OUR INSTITUTION. PG RECONSTRUCTION IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE FOR HPD IN REDUCING THE INCIDENCE OF CR-POPF.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2438680 | PDS II POLYDIOXANONE SUTURE UNKNOWN PRODUCT | SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE | NEW | ETHICON INC. |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown | Required Intervention |