VUE PACS
Report
- Report Number
- 3003768277-2025-011134
- Event Type
- Death
- Date Received
- September 30, 2025
- Date of Event
- September 23, 2025
- Report Date
- February 12, 2026
- Manufacturer
- PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V.
- Product Code
- LLZ
- PMA / PMN Number
- K170580
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- GM
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
ON (B)(6) 2025, IT WAS REPORTED TO PHILIPS THAT DURING THE TRIAGE OF A PATIENT SUFFERING FROM A TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY, CEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE AND SIGNS OF INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE, WHEN THE CUSTOMER ATTEMPTED READING PATIENT IMAGES PRIOR TO AN OPERATION, VUE PACS CLIENT DIAGNOSTIC VIEWER CRASHED SEVERAL TIMES, AND AN ERROR MESSAGE APPEARED. AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, THE IMAGES WERE AVAILABLE, AND THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE OPERATION. THE PATIENT EXPIRED SHORTLY AFTER THE OPERATION. A COMPREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION WAS CONDUCTED BY PHILIPS. THE ANALYSIS ESTABLISHED THAT A CUSTOMER NETWORK ERROR HAD A DIRECT IMPACT ON THE CLIENT WORKSTATION ABILITY TO FUNCTION. VUE PACS SERVER COMPONENT: THE SERVER OPERATED WITHIN EXPECTED PARAMETERS AND DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE DELAY REPORTED IN THIS CASE. VUE PACS CLIENT COMPONENT: THE CLIENT WORKSTATION EXPERIENCED THREE SEPARATE EXTERNAL NETWORK DISCONNECTIONS DURING THE INCIDENT. WHILE THE SYSTEM PERMITTED CONTINUED READING OR ALLOWED THE USER TO LOG OUT AND LOG BACK IN, THESE EVENTS DID NOT RESULT IN ADDITIONAL TRIAGE TIME ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DEVICE ITSELF. THE CLIENT OPERATED WITHIN EXPECTED PARAMETERS AND DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE DELAY REPORTED. IMAGE TRANSFER: THE TIME REQUIRED FOR IMAGE TRANSFER FROM THE SCANNING DEVICE TO THE SERVER WAS THE PRIMARY FACTOR DICTATING THE ABILITY TO REVIEW IMAGES AND THE LENGTH OF DIAGNOSIS. IMAGES WERE TRANSFERRED IN TWO SEPARATE CYCLES. THE LOGOUT/LOGIN PROCESS DID NOT INTRODUCE FURTHER DELAYS TO THE OVERALL TRIAGE TIMELINE. BASED ON THE FINDINGS, THE INVESTIGATION CONCLUDED THAT THE PHILIPS VUE PACS CLIENT DIAGNOSTIC VIEWER FUNCTIONED AS INTENDED AND NO DEVICE MALFUNCTION IDENTIFIED. HENCE, DEVICE DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED ADVERSE EVENT.
IT WAS REPORTED TO PHILIPS THAT WHEN THE CUSTOMER ATTEMPTED READING PATIENT IMAGES PRIOR TO AN OPERATION, VUE PACS CLIENT DIAGNOSTIC VIEWER CRASHED SEVERAL TIMES AND AN ERROR MESSAGE APPEARED. AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS, THE IMAGES WERE AVAILABLE AND THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE OPERATION. THE PATIENT EXPIRED SHORTLY AFTER THE OPERATION. PHILIPS HAS STARTED AN INVESTIGATION OF THIS COMPLAINT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 336308 | VUE PACS | SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING, RADIOLOGICAL | LLZ | PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS NEDERLAND B.V. | VUE PACS |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown | Death |