REZUM
Report
- Report Number
- 2124215-2025-60002
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- September 3, 2025
- Date of Event
- May 29, 2021
- Report Date
- September 29, 2025
- Manufacturer
- BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
- Product Code
- KNS
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FR
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
THERE WAS NO DEVICE AVAILABLE FOR ANALYSIS; THEREFORE, NO PHYSICAL OR VISUAL ANALYSIS OF THE PRODUCT COULD BE PERFORMED. THE REPORTED PATIENT SYMPTOMS ARE KNOWN RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THESE DEVICES AS INDICATED IN THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE. BASED ON THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE, A CONCLUSION CODE OF KNOWN INHERENT RISK OF DEVICE WAS ASSIGNED TO THIS INVESTIGATION. DETAILED PRODUCT INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED TO BSC. WE COMPLETED A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO OBTAIN THE INFORMATION. BECAUSE THE PRODUCT IS UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME, WE ARE UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE COMPLETE UNIQUE IDENTIFIER (UDI) # AND OTHER PRODUCT SPECIFIC INFORMATION. IF ADDITIONAL DETAILS BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. THE EVENT DATE WAS ASSIGNED ACCORDING TO THE ARTICLE PUBLISHED DATE. CITATION: MICHAEL, B., MARC F, BASTIEN G, BENJAMIN P., MICKAEL U. (2024). HEAD TO HEAD COMPARISON OF PROSTATIC URETHRAL LIFT AND WATER VAPOR THERMAL THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA: A REAL LIFE STUDY. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021 (53), 1757- 1763.
DETAILED PRODUCT INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED TO BSC. WE COMPLETED A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO OBTAIN THE INFORMATION. BECAUSE THE PRODUCT IS UNKNOWN AT THIS TIME, WE ARE UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE COMPLETE UNIQUE IDENTIFIER (UDI) # AND OTHER PRODUCT SPECIFIC INFORMATION. IF ADDITIONAL DETAILS BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. THE EVENT DATE WAS ASSIGNED ACCORDING TO THE ARTICLE PUBLISHED DATE. CITATION: MICHAEL, B., MARC F, BASTIEN G, BENJAMIN P., MICKAEL U. (2024). HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON OF PROSTATIC URETHRAL LIFT AND WATER VAPOR THERMAL THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA: A REAL-LIFE STUDY. INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021 (53), 1757- 1763.
IT WAS REPORTED IN THE INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY THAT A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY WAS TO PERFORM A HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON BETWEEN WATER VAPOR THERMAL THERAPY USING THE REZUM SYSTEM AND PROSTATIC URETHRAL LIFT USING THE UROLIFT SYSTEM IN MEN WITH LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS DUE TO BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA (BPH). A TOTAL OF 61 PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT REZUM AND UROLIFT PROCEDURES IN TWO UROLOGY CENTERS HAVE BEEN RETROSPECTIVELY CONSIDERED, ONLY PATIENTS WITH A PROSTATE SIZE LESS THAN 80 ML WERE ENROLLED FROM DECEMBER 2017 TO NOVEMBER 2019. THE FOLLOWING BOSTON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCT WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURES: REZUM DELIVERY DEVICE. REGARDING POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, 3 PATIENTS DEVELOPED RETENTION, 2 PATIENTS EXPERIENCED GROSS HEMATURIA, AND 1 PATIENT HAD URINARY TRACT INFECTION. TWO PATIENTS REQUIRED A THIRTY-DAY READMISSION DUE TO THE HEMATURIA AND ACUTE URINARY RETENTION MENTIONED BEFORE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT ONE PATIENT REPORTED A DECREASE IN EJACULATORY VOLUME AND ANOTHER REPORTED ANEJACULATION. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT IN THIS SMALL RETROSPECTIVE STUDY, THE RESULTS INDICATE THAT BOTH REZUM AND UROLIFT PROVIDE A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN SYMPTOMS AND QOL (QUALITY OF LIFE), ALTHOUGH SOME OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS WERE GREATER IN THE REZUM ARM. FUTURE STUDIES ARE NEEDED TO DEFINITIVELY ASSESS WHICH TREATMENT WOULD BE BEST SUITED FOR EACH PATIENT.
IT WAS REPORTED IN THE INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY THAT A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY WAS TO PERFORM A HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON BETWEEN WATER VAPOR THERMAL THERAPY USING THE REZUM SYSTEM AND PROSTATIC URETHRAL LIFT USING THE UROLIFT SYSTEM IN MEN WITH LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS DUE TO BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA (BPH). A TOTAL OF 61 PATIENTS WHO UNDERWENT REZUM AND UROLIFT PROCEDURES IN TWO UROLOGY CENTERS HAVE BEEN RETROSPECTIVELY CONSIDERED, ONLY PATIENTS WITH A PROSTATE SIZE LESS THAN 80 ML WERE ENROLLED FROM (B)(6) 2017 TO (B)(6) 2019. THE FOLLOWING BOSTON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCT WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURES: REZUM DELIVERY DEVICE. REGARDING POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS, 3 PATIENTS DEVELOPED RETENTION, 2 PATIENTS EXPERIENCED GROSS HEMATURIA, AND 1 PATIENT HAD URINARY TRACT INFECTION. TWO PATIENTS REQUIRED A THIRTY-DAY READMISSION DUE TO THE HEMATURIA AND ACUTE URINARY RETENTION MENTIONED BEFORE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT ONE PATIENT REPORTED A DECREASE IN EJACULATORY VOLUME AND ANOTHER REPORTED ANEJACULATION. IT IS CONCLUDED THAT IN THIS SMALL RETROSPECTIVE STUDY, THE RESULTS INDICATE THAT BOTH REZUM AND UROLIFT PROVIDE A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMENT IN SYMPTOMS AND QOL (QUALITY OF LIFE), ALTHOUGH SOME OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS WERE GREATER IN THE REZUM ARM. FUTURE STUDIES ARE NEEDED TO DEFINITIVELY ASSESS WHICH TREATMENT WOULD BE BEST SUITED FOR EACH PATIENT.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2234331 | REZUM | UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES) | KNS | BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown | Other| H |