ENDOPLASTIC ELECTROSURGICAL DISSECTOR
Report
- Report Number
- 1038548-2011-00031
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- October 5, 2011
- Date of Event
- August 11, 2011
- Manufacturer
- CAREFUSION
- Product Code
- GEI
- PMA / PMN Number
- K930666
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
(B)(4). "THIS MDR WAS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED WITHIN THE 30 DAY TIME FRAME BEARING THE REGISTRATION NUMBER OF CARDINAL HEALTH IN ERROR DUE TO A REPORTING SOFTWARE DISCREPANCY. CAREFUSION HAS BEEN ADVISED BY (B)(6) OF THE FDA'S OFFICE OF SURVEILLANCE AND BIOMETRICS IN THE (B)(6) ON (B)(6) 2011, TO RESUBMIT THE MDR BEARING CAREFUSION'S REGISTRATION NUMBER AND TO INCLUDE THIS VERBIAGE WITHIN THE REPORT, AS WELL AS WITHIN CAREFUSION'S COMPLAINT MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE." THE DEVICE WAS NOT RECEIVED FOR EVALUATION AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. ALTHOUGH A LOT NUMBER WAS PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMER, WITHOUT THE RETURNED DEVICE, WE CANNOT VERIFY THE LOT NUMBER TO BE CORRECT. BASED ON LOT NUMBER PROVIDED, A DHR REVIEW WAS PERFORMED. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD DID NOT INDICATE ANY NON-CONFORMITY THAT WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED ISSUE. WITHOUT THE DEVICE, AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION A DETERMINATION COULD NOT BE MADE. BY THE DESCRIPTION OF THE ISSUE AND PHOTOS, POSSIBLE REASONS THIS PRODUCT COULD HAVE FAILED: INSULATION HAD A CRACK IN IT PRIOR TO SURGERY AND ATTENDS DID NOT CHECK INSTRUMENTS. AGE OF THE INSTRUMENT. DEVICE WAS DROPPED COULD HAVE CAUSE CRACK. HARSH DETERGENT FOR CLEANING INSTRUMENT COULD HAVE DAMAGE DEVICE INSULATION. SHOULD THE DEVICE BECOME AVAILABLE A NEW ISSUE WILL BE OPENED AND AN INVESTIGATION WILL BE PERFORMED. A TREND WAS REVIEWED FOR PRODUCT CODE 88-5227 FROM 2007 TO CURRENT FOR THE TYPE OF ISSUE REPORTED. NO ISSUES OF THIS TYPE WERE REPORTED FOR PRODUCT CODE 88-5227, THEREFORE NO TRENDS DETECTED.
THE INSULATOR OF THIS DISSECTOR MELTS IN BREAST IMPLANT SURGERY AND THE PATIENT'S SKIN INJURED BY ELECTRIC LEAKAGE. WE HAVE TO RETURN THE DEFECT PRODUCT TO EXCHANGE NEW ONE. (B)(6) 2011: FOLLOW UP INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT WAS RELAYED BY (B)(6). THE DEVICE IN QUESTION HAD BEEN USED FOR 10 MONTHS BY THE FACILITY. A MAMMAPLASTY PROCEDURE WAS UNDERWAY AND THE SURGEON MADE AN INCISION UNDER THE PATIENT'S ARM AREA, AND USED THE PRODUCT TO STOP BLEEDING. THE INSULATION PART FAILED AND THE BLADE WAS PARTLY EXPOSED AND THERE WAS A SPARK WHICH CAUSED A BURN. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED BUT SPECIFICS WERE NOT PROVIDED. THE MAMMAPLASTY WAS COMPLETED. THE SURGEON OPENED A NEW ELECTROSURGICAL SCISSOR TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ENDOPLASTIC ELECTROSURGICAL DISSECTOR | ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES | GEI | CAREFUSION | 88-5227 | 827190 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention |