XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2011-06357
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- September 16, 2011
- Date of Event
- May 26, 2011
- Report Date
- August 22, 2011
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- NIQ
- PMA / PMN Number
- P070015
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JO
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: EVALUATION OF THE RETURNED XIENCE V STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) NOTED BLOOD ON THE HUB, SHAFT, BALLOON AND STENT IMPLANT AND IN THE GUIDE WIRE LUMEN. THERE WAS CONTRAST ON THE SHAFT AND IN THE INFLATION LUMEN. THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH HANDLING, PREPARATION, AND SUGGESTS THE SDS WAS ADVANCED INTO THE BODY. THE UNDAMAGED STENT IMPLANT WAS STATIONARY ON THE TIGHTLY FOLDED BALLOON BETWEEN THE MARKERS. THE TIP LENGTH AND STENT IMPLANT OUTER DIAMETERS MET MANUFACTURING CRITERIA. THERE WAS A KINK AND A BEND IN THE HYPOTUBE. THIS DAMAGE WAS NOT OBSERVED DURING PRODUCT INSPECTION PRIOR TO USE AND THUS, MAY HAVE OCCURRED DURING OR AFTER THE PROCEDURAL ATTEMPTS TO CROSS THE LESION OR POSSIBLY AS A RESULT OF PACKAGING AND SHIPMENT BACK TO ABBOTT VASCULAR FOR ANALYSIS. THE HYPOTUBE HAD SEPARATED 15.5 CENTIMETERS DISTAL TO THE STRAIN RELIEF TUBING. THE FRACTURE FACES WERE OVALED AS IF KINKED PRIOR TO SEPARATING. THE HYPOTUBE JACKET WAS STRETCHED AND SEPARATED AT THE SAME LOCATION. THIS TYPE OF FAILURE IS OFTEN ATTRIBUTED TO DUCTILE OVERLOAD AT A BEND. KINKS OR BENDS IN THE SHAFT CAN LEAD TO WEAKENING OF THE SDS MATERIAL SUCH THAT SUBSEQUENT APPLICATION OF FORCE OR FURTHER HANDLING CAN CAUSE A SEPARATION. SINCE THERE WAS NO REPORT OF ANY DAMAGE OBSERVED TO THE SDS PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, THIS MAY SUGGEST THAT A PRODUCT DEFICIENCY DID NOT CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED SHAFT SEPARATION. THE SHAFT MOST LIKELY KINKED DURING THE ATTEMPT TO CROSS AND FURTHER MANIPULATION OF THE CATHETER WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE SHAFT SEPARATING. A REVIEW OF THE LOT HISTORY RECORD FOR THE REPORTED LOT WAS PERFORMED AND DID NOT REVEAL ANY ASSOCIATED NONCONFORMING MATERIAL RECORDS WHICH WOULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED COMPLAINT. A QUERY THE COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE FOR THE REPORTED LOT WAS PERFORMED AND THERE ARE NO OTHER INCIDENTS REPORTED FOR SHAFT SEPARATION. THERE ARE NO LOT SPECIFIC PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCIES. THE PROFILE DIMENSIONS ON ALL STENT DELIVERY SYSTEMS ARE CONFIRMED BY VISUAL AND DIMENSIONAL CHECKS ON THE MANUFACTURING LINE BEFORE RELEASE. ADDITIONALLY, ALL STENT DELIVERY SYSTEMS ARE VISUALLY INSPECTED FOR KINKS DURING THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS, INCLUDING A FINAL INSPECTION OF THE PRODUCT BEFORE BEING INSERTED INTO THE DISPENSER COIL. ADDITIONALLY, AND A SAMPLING OF UNITS IS DESTRUCTIVELY TESTED TO VERIFY LUMEN INTEGRITY.
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PREDILATATION WAS PERFORMED IN THE CALCIFIED AND TORTUOUS LEFT CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY; HOWEVER, THE XIENCE V FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION. THE EXTERNAL PART (PROXIMAL SHAFT) SEPARATED INTO TWO PIECES. THE XIENCE V STENT WAS NOT IMPLANTED. NO PATIENT INJURY WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY ONLY WITH A GOOD RESULT. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | XIENCE V EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM | DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM | NIQ | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 1012841 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 75 YR |