CERENE CRYOTHERAPY DEVICE
Report
- Report Number
- 3012018285-2025-00004
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 10, 2025
- Date of Event
- June 10, 2025
- Report Date
- July 10, 2025
- Manufacturer
- CHANNEL MEDSYSTEMS, INC.
- Product Code
- MNB
- UDI-DI
- 00850008595035
- PMA / PMN Number
- P180032
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
- Health Professional
- Yes
Narratives
THIS REPORT ENCOMPASSES THREE TREATMENT ATTEMPTS WITH THE CERENE CRYOTHERAPY DEVICE MADE ON (B)(6) 2025 THAT RESULTED IN THE PATIENT NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT AND HAVING AN MRI POST-PROCEDURE. IT WAS THIS MRI THAT WAS DETERMINED TO BE AN "OTHER SERIOUS IMPORTANT MEDICAL EVENT," THEREBY PROMPTING A RE-EVALUATION OF THE INITIAL COMPLAINT. THE MANUFACTURER BECAME AWARE OF THIS INTERVENTION ON JUNE 10TH, 2025. THE FIRST AND SECOND DEVICES WERE RETURNED ON JUNE 5, 2025. THE THIRD DEVICE WAS RETURNED ON JUNE 10, 2025. BASED ON THE RESULTS FROM ANALYSIS OF THE DEVICE LOG AND INSPECTION OF THE RETURNED DEVICES, THE ROOT CAUSES FOR THE PRODUCT PROBLEMS ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE FIRST DEVICE (EC120 - SHEATH RETRACTED WITHOUT VACUUM, PRE-INSERTION) WAS USER ERROR. THE USER APPEARS TO HAVE RETRACTED THE SHEATH PRIOR TO POWERING ON THE DEVICE WHICH TRIGGERED THE EC120 ERROR CODE. THE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE SECOND AND THIRD DEVICES (EC300 - POSSIBLE PERFORATION) APPEARS TO BE DUE TO A NON-DEVICE RELATED ISSUE THAT CAUSED THE LINER TO INFLATE FOR AN EXTENDED LENGTH OF TIME, THEREBY TRIGGERING A POSSIBLE PERFORATION MESSAGE IN THE ABSENCE OF A UTERINE PERFORATION. THERE WERE NO OBSERVATIONS OF NOTE FOR THE RETURNED DEVICES UPON VISUAL INSPECTION, THE DEVICES PASSED ALL TESTS WHEN RE-TESTED, AND THE REPORTED PRODUCT PROBLEM COULD NOT BE REPRODUCED DURING THE INVESTIGATION.
WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PERFORM AN ENDOMETRIAL CRYOABLATION ON A PATIENT WITH THE CERENE CRYOTHERAPY DEVICE, THE PHYSICIAN HAD DIFFICULTY DILATING THE PATIENT'S CERVIX (WHICH THE PATIENT REPORTED AS BEING VERY PAINFUL) AND INSERTED THE DEVICE INTO THE PATIENT PRIOR TO TURNING THE DEVICE ON. THE PHYSICIAN THEN REMOVED THE DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT AND TURNED IT ON, AT WHICH POINT THE DEVICE REPORTED ERROR CODE 120 (SHEATH RETRACTED WITHOUT VACUUM, PRE-INSERTION). THE PHYSICIAN PROCEEDED TO REATTEMPT THE PROCEDURE WITH ANOTHER DEVICE AND TURNED ON THE DEVICE PRIOR TO INSERTION INTO THE PATIENT, AS PER THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, WHILE USING ULTRASOUND DURING INSERTION TO VIEW THE LOCATION OF THE DEVICE (PROBE) AND CONFIRM PROPER PLACEMENT AT THE FUNDUS. AFTER INITIAL DEVICE LINER DEPLOYMENT AND SAFETY CHECKS, THE DEVICE REPORTED AN ERROR CODE "POSSIBLE PERFORATION." AS PER THE IFU "TREATMENT STATUS & NEXT STEPS," THE PHYSICIAN PROCEEDED TO REATTEMPT THE PROCEDURE FOR A 3RD TIME WITH THE THIRD DEVICE ALSO REPORTING AN ERROR CODE "POSSIBLE PERFORATION." THE PHYSICIAN ELECTED TO STOP ANY FURTHER ATTEMPTS, AND THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED WITHOUT TREATMENT. THE PATIENT REPORTED THE DAY AFTER THE ATTEMPTED PROCEDURES THAT SHE DOES NOT HAVE AND HAS NEVER HAD A PERFORATED UTERUS. IN THE SUBSEQUENT WEEK(S) AFTER THE UNSUCCESSFUL TREATMENT ATTEMPTS, THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT SHE RECENTLY HAD UNDERGONE AN MRI OF THE PELVIS, WHICH CONFIRMED NO EVIDENCE OF UTERINE RUPTURE, THINNING, OR WEAKNESS.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1730297 | CERENE CRYOTHERAPY DEVICE | ENDOMETRIAL ABLATION DEVICE | MNB | CHANNEL MEDSYSTEMS, INC. | FGS-7000 | 108645587 | 00850008595035 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Female | Other |