DIRECTLINK ICP EXTENSION CABLE
Report
- Report Number
- 3013886523-2025-00166
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- July 10, 2025
- Report Date
- September 26, 2025
- Manufacturer
- INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES SWITZERLAND SAR
- Product Code
- GWM
- PMA / PMN Number
- K152670
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
- Health Professional
- N
Narratives
AN INVESTIGATION HAS BEEN INITIATED BASED ON THE REPORTED INFORMATION. UPON COMPLETION OF THE INVESTIGATION, A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED.
UPDATED FIELDS: D4, D9, G3, G6, H2, H3, H6, H11. THE DIRECTLINK ICP EXTENSION CABLE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AND LOT NUMBER INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED; THEREFORE, AN EVALUATION OF THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE PERFORMED, AND DEVICE HISTORY RECORD (DHR) COULD NOT BE REVIEWED. THE ROOT CAUSE(S) OF THE REPORTED ISSUE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. IF ADDITIONAL RELEVANT INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE IN THE FUTURE, THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE REOPENED, AND THE RESPECTIVE EVALUATION PERFORMED. TRENDS WILL BE MONITORED FOR THIS AND SIMILAR ISSUES. AT PRESENT, WE CONSIDER THIS COMPLAINT TO BE CLOSED.
3 OF 6 REPORTS. OTHER MFG REPORT NUMBERS: 3013886523-2025-00164, 3013886523-2025-00165, 3013886523-2025-00167, 3013886523-2025-00168, 3013886523-2025-00169. THIS REPORT IS FOR THE 1ST EVENT (DIRECTLINK ICP EXTENSION CABLE). A PHYSICIAN EXPRESSED A LOSS OF CONFIDENCE IN CERELINK ICP SENSORS. THEY ESTIMATE THAT IN 50% OF THE CASES WHERE A PATIENT HAD AN CERELINK ICP SENSOR AND A CHECK OF ICP WITH A FFT (FLUID FILLED TRANSDUCER) VIA THE EXTERNAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM THEY NOTICED A DECLINE AND DIFFERENCE THAT BECOMES BIGGER AND BIGGER (CFR DRIFT) AFTER A COUPLE OF DAYS. THEY DOUBLE CHECK THE FFT MEASUREMENT AS THIS IS POSITIONING (HIGHT) DEPENDANT, HOWEVER DON'T NOTICE MISTAKES WITH EVD SYSTEM, SO THEY CONCLUDED WRONG MEASUREMENT OF CERLINK SENSOR (USE THIS TOGETHER WITH DIRECTLINK). ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: IS IT POSSIBLE TO KNOW HOW MANY TIMES THIS TYPE OF DYSFUNCTION WAS OBSERVED? IF YES, HOW MANY AND APPROXIMATE DATE? ANSWER: THEY ESTIMATE50% OF THE CASE, AND AS I COUNT 38 PROBES SINCE 2023. I BELIEVE18 WOULD BE AN EDUCATED ESTIMATION FOR EACH CASE, DID THEY REMOVE THE SENSOR? HOW DID THEY FOLLOW THE MONITORING? ANSWER: THEY NOTICED THE INCONSISTENCY AS THEY SIMULTANEOUSLY MEASURED ICP WITH A FLUID FILLED TRANSDUCER ON THEIR SYSTEM FOR EXTERNAL DRAINAGE. SO, THEY KEPT THE SENSOR IN AS LONG AS POSSIBLE TO KEEP MEASURING ICP IN 2 WAYS, RELYING MORE ON FFT THAN CERELINK FOR EACH PATIENT, WERE THERE ANY CONSEQUENCES? IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE. ANSWER: FOR SOME PATIENT THEY SAW THAT THE ICP WAVE WAS ¿FLATTENED¿, AND AS A CONSEQUENCE NOT RELIABLE ANYMORE SO THEY SWITCHED TO EVD (PROBABLY EARLIER) SO SOME OF THOSE PROCEDURES COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED IF SENSOR WAS WORKING AS EXPECTED. (THEN A PLACEMENT OF EXTERNAL DRAINAGE COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1317780 | DIRECTLINK ICP EXTENSION CABLE | DIRECTLINK - CABLES | GWM | INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES SWITZERLAND SAR |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NA | Unknown |