OT ULTRA EASY METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2011-08442
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- August 31, 2011
- Date of Event
- August 22, 2011
- Report Date
- August 23, 2011
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- UK
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
FOLLOW-UP # 1 (10/19/2011)-DEVICE EVALUATION: THE METER INVOLVED WITH THIS COMPLAINT HAS BEEN RETURNED AND EVALUATED BY PRODUCT ANALYSIS ON (B)(6), 2011 WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: THE METER HAS PASSED TESTING WITH NO FAULTS FOUND. IF LIFESCAN OBTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS COMPLAINT, A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, LIFESCAN CONSIDERS THIS MATTER CLOSED.
THE LAY USER/PATIENT'S PRODUCT(S) HAVE BEEN RETURNED AND EVALUATED BY LIFESCAN PRODUCT ANALYSIS WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: THE TEST STRIPS INVOLVED IN THIS CASE HAVE PASSED ALL TESTING WITH NO FAULTS FOUND. IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE, THE FDA WILL BE NOTIFIED IN A FOLLOW UP REPORT. AT THIS TIME, WE CONSIDER THIS MATTER CLOSED. 510K#: K061118.
ON (B)(6) 2011, THE LAY USER/PATIENT IN THE (B)(6) CONTACTED LIFESCAN TO REPORT THE ONE TOUCH ULTRAEASY METER WAS GIVING INACCURATELY HIGH READINGS. THE TECHNICAL SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (TSR) CONTACTED THE PATIENT TO OBTAIN AND VERIFY INFORMATION; HOWEVER WAS UNABLE TO REACH HIM BY TELEPHONE. THE SR. MEDICAL SURVEILLANCE SPECIALIST CLASSIFIED THE COMPLAINT BASED ON THE INFORMATION INITIALLY PROVIDED TO CUSTOMER SERVICE. ON (B)(6) 2011 AT 11:30 PM THE PATIENT OBTAINED THE BLOOD GLUCOSE READING OF 5.8 MMOL/L ON THE REPORTED METER, AND A READING OF 3.8 MMOL/L ON A BACKUP METER. FOLLOWING THESE READINGS, THE PATIENT ATE A MEAL AND TOOK HIS "USUAL" DOSE OF INSULIN. AT AN UNSPECIFIED TIME AFTERWARDS, THE PATIENT PASSED OUT. THE PATIENT'S SON REVIVED HIM AND TREATED HIM WITH SIX GLUCOSE TABLETS. EMERGENCY SERVICES WERE CONTACTED. PARAMEDICS ARRIVED ON (B)(6), 12:00 AM AND TESTED THE PATIENT'S BLOOD GLUCOSE LEVEL TO BE 3.1 MMOL/L. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HELPFUL TO DETERMINE THE DOSE OF INSULIN TAKEN BASED ON THE 5.8 MMOL/L READING, THE PATIENT'S EXPECTED READINGS AT THAT TIME OF NIGHT, THE TIME OF THE ONSET OF SYMPTOMS, HOW THE PATIENT WAS REVIVED, HIS DIABETES MEDICATION REGIMEN, AND WHAT TREATMENT, IF ANY, HE RECEIVED FROM THE PARAMEDICS. TROUBLESHOOTING REVEALED THE PATIENT'S TESTING TECHNIQUE AND TEST STRIPS WERE CORRECT, AND THE METER WAS SET TO THE CORRECT UNIT OF MEASURE. QUALITY CONTROL TESTING WAS PERFORMED DURING THE TROUBLESHOOTING TELEPHONE CALL, WITH PASSING RESULTS. THE METER WAS REPLACED. THE PATIENT ALLEGEDLY SUFFERED SYMPTOMS SUGGESTING SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA AFTER TAKING INSULIN BASED ON A METER READING, AND RECEIVED EMERGENCY MEDICAL ATTENTION AND TREATMENT. THEREFORE THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT ULTRA EASY METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN INC. | 3068728 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56 YR | Life Threatening| R |