NOVOFINE (32G) (NEEDLE) N/A
Report
- Report Number
- 9681821-2011-00028
- Event Type
- Other
- Date Received
- August 18, 2011
- Date of Event
- May 24, 2011
- Report Date
- May 27, 2011
- Manufacturer
- NOVO NORDISK A/S MEDICAL SYSTEMS
- Product Code
- FMI
- PMA / PMN Number
- K062500
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
EVALUATION SUMMARY: NEEDLE CONCLUSION: BATCH HISTORY FROM FINAL QC-RELEASE EXAMINED. MICROSCOPICAL EXAMINATIONS PERFORMED. NEEDLES TESTED FOR RESISTANCE TO BREAKAGE. WE CAN CONFIRM THAT THE RETURNED UNSEALED NEEDLE TUBE IS BROKEN OFF AT THE NEEDLE HUB. NEEDLES TUBES ARE DELICATE, AND MUST NOT BE USED IF BENT OR OTHERWISE DAMAGED PRIOR TO USE. FURTHERMORE PLEASE NOTE THAT NEEDLES ARE FOR SINGLE-USE ONLY. DURING TEST IT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE TO DETECT ANY IRREGULARITIES RELATED TO THE COMPLAINT ON THE SEALED AND UNUSED NEEDLES, FROM THE SAME NEEDLE BOX AS THE NEEDLE INVOLVED IN THIS COMPLAINT.
NEEDLE BROKE OFF IN HER THIGH [NEEDLE ISSUE]. CASE DESCRIPTION: THE INCIDENT DOES NOT REPRESENT A SERIOUS PUBLIC HEALTH THREAT. (B)(4). THIS SPONTANEOUS CASE FROM (B)(6) WAS REPORTED BY A CONSUMER AS "NEEDLE WAS INSERTED INTO TISSUE" AND CONCERNS A (B)(6) FEMALE PATIENT TREATED USING NOVOFINE NEEDLES FROM AN UNKNOWN DATE TO AN UNKNOWN DATE DUE TO TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS. PATIENT HEIGHT: (B)(6). MEDICAL HISTORY INCLUDES ASTHMA AND TREMOR. IN THE EVENING OF (B)(6), 2011, THE PATIENT ATTACHED A NW NOVOFINE 6 MM 32 G NEEDLE ON HER DEVICE. SHE DID A FUNCTION CHECK. AFTERWARDS SHE SELECTED 3 UNITS AND INJECTED IN HER LEFT THIGH WITH HER RIGHT HAND. PATIENT INJECTED INTO A SKIN FOLD THAT SHE BUILT UNTIL THE END OF INJECTION. NEEDLE WAS INSERTED INTO TISSUE IN A 90 DEGREE ANGLE. THE PATIENT IMMEDIATELY NOTICED AFTER INJECTION THAT THE NEEDLE HAD BROKEN OFF. SHE WENT TO THE HOSPITAL, BUT THE NEEDLE COULD NOT BE REMOVED AS IT WAS NOT VISIBLE, THOUGH THE PATIENT COULD FEEL IT WITH HER HANDS WHEN TOUCHING THE INJECTION SITE. NO FURTHER INVESTIGATION WAS DONE THEN. ON (B)(6), THE PATIENT WENT TO SEE HER SURGEON. THE SURGEON COULD NOT CLEARLY SEE THE NEEDLE ON THE RADIOGRAPH AND TOLD THE PATIENT TO WAIT AND SEE IF THE INJECTION SITE WOULD INFLAME. ON (B)(6), THE PATIENT WENT TO SEEN HER SURGEON AGAIN AS THE INJECTION SITE WAS INFLAMED WITH BLEEDING AND SANIES. ON (B)(6), THE NEEDLE WAS REMOVED SURGICALLY. AFTER THE SURGERY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN ON THE SURGERY SITE. SHE RECEIVED PARACETAMOL 500 ALMOST EVERY 2 HOURS FROM (B)(6). DUE TO THE PAIN, THE PATIENT HAD TO WALK ON CRUTCHES DURING THIS TIME. ABOUT 10 CM AROUND THE SCAR, THE PATIENT FEELS NUMBNESS. WITH THE USE OF A NEW BATCH, THE EVENT DID NOT REOCCUR. ANALYSIS REPLY: PRODUCT NOVOFINE 6MM 32 G TIP. LOT NO: 10E21S. NEEDLE CONCLUSION: BATCH HISTORY FROM FINAL QC-RELEASE EXAMINED. MICROSCOPICAL EXAMINATIONS PERFORMED. NEEDLES TESTED FOR RESISTANCE TO BREAKAGE. WE CAN CONFIRM THAT THE RETURNED UNSEALED NEEDLE TUBE IS BROKEN OFF AT THE NEEDLE HUB. NEEDLE TUBES ARE DELICATE, AND MUST NOT BE USED IF BENT OR OTHERWISE ACCIDENTALLY DAMAGED PRIOR TO USE. FURTHERMORE PLEASE NOTE THAT NEEDLES ARE FOR SINGLE-USE ONLY. DURING TESTING, IT HAS NOT BEEN POSSIBLE TO DETECT ANY IRREGULARITIES RELATED TO THE COMPLAINT ON THE SEALED AND UNUSED NEEDLES, FROM THE SAME NEEDLE BOX AS THE NEEDLE INVOLVED IN THIS COMPLAINT. THIS CASE WAS RE-CLASSIFIED FROM NON-SERIOUS TO SERIOUS ON (B)(4), 2011 DUE TO FOLLOW-UP RECEIVED ADDING "INTERVENTION REQUIRED" SERIOUSNESS-CRITERIA TO THE CASE.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NOVOFINE (32G) (NEEDLE) N/A | NEEDLE | FMI | NOVO NORDISK A/S MEDICAL SYSTEMS | NA | 10E21S |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 YR | Required Intervention | NOVORAPID (INSULIN ASPART) SOLUTION FOR INJECTION| 100 U/ML| INJECTION| PROTAPHANE (INSULIN HUMAN), SUSPENSION FOR |