REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE
Report
- Report Number
- 2015691-2011-16049
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- August 16, 2011
- Date of Event
- July 22, 2011
- Report Date
- July 25, 2011
- Manufacturer
- EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
- Product Code
- DYE
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- JA
- Reporter Occupation
- PHYSICIAN
Narratives
ADDITIONAL MANUFACTURER NARRATIVE: CONCLUSION: FROM THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE SURGEON, IT APPEARS THE SUTURES DURING IMPLANT WERE TOO CLOSE TO THE EDGE OF THE PATIENT'S ANNULUS WHICH ALLOWED THEM TO PULL THROUGH THE TISSUE. THE SUTURES DID NOT PULL THROUGH THE SEWING RING OF THE VALVE; THEREFORE, IT IS CONCLUDED THAT THIS EVENT WAS NOT DUE TO A MALFUNCTION OF THE DEVICE BUT DUE TO PATIENT FACTORS. IT WAS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED THAT THE DHR WAS IN PROCESS. THE DHR REVIEW WAS COMPLETED. THIS DEVICE PASSED ALL MANUFACTURING AND STERILIZATION INSPECTIONS WITH NO NONCONFORMANCE. IT WAS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS BEING RETURNED. HOWEVER, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION AS IT WAS DISCARDED BY THE HOSPITAL. THE SURGEON'S REPORT WAS ALSO INCORRECTLY REPORTED. BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE WAS PARTIALLY DETACHED AT THE SUTURE KNOTTING AREA DUE TO THE TEAR IN THE PATIENT'S TISSUE, HOWEVER THE CAUSE WAS NOT DEVICE RELATED.
METHOD: DEVICE NOT RETURNED. THE DHR REVIEW IS CURRENTLY IN PROCESS. THE DEVICE IS NOT AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION AS IT HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
REPORTEDLY, THE 21MM VALVE WAS EXPLANTED AFTER AN IMPLANT DURATION OF 2.83 MONTHS DUE TO REGURGITATION FROM A CUT ON PATIENT'S ANNULUS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PERIMOUNT VALVE WAS IMPLANTED FOR AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT (AVR) ON (B)(6) 2011. ON (B)(6) 2011, THE VALVE WAS EXPLANTED FOR AVR. AT THE EXPLANT, REGURGITATION WAS OBSERVED FROM A CUT ON THE TISSUE OF THE PATIENT'S ANNULUS LED BY A SUTURE ON THE ANNULUS. PER INFORMATION RECEIVED BY THE DEALER, THERE WAS AN ANEURYSM-LIKE THING OBSERVED AT THE REGURGITATION AREA. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THROUGH THE DEALER THAT IT SEEMED THE CUSTOMER WAS CONSIDERING THAT THIS EVENT WAS CAUSED DUE TO THE SUTURING BEING SHORT ON THE TISSUE. SURGEON'S COMMENTS: BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE WAS PARTIALLY DETACHED AT THE SUTURE KNOTTING AREA DUE TO THE TEAR IN THE PATIENT'S TISSUE, HOWEVER, THE CAUSE WAS NOT DEVICE RELATED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | REPLACEMENT HEART VALVE | DYE | EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES | SEE H10 | 10J200 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74 YR | Hospitalization| R |