PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2011-05743
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- August 15, 2011
- Date of Event
- July 22, 2011
- Report Date
- July 22, 2011
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- AL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. THE RETURN OF THE DEVICE MAY HAVE ASSISTED THE INVESTIGATION OF THE COMPLAINT. THEREFORE, A CONCLUSIVE CAUSE TO THE REPORTED SUTURE BREAK AND THE DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE THAT REQUIRED THERAPY/NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. A DIFFICULT TO REMOVE DEVICE, AND A SUTURE BREAK CAN BE CAUSED BY A NUMBER OF FACTORS INCLUDE MANUFACTURING, USER TECHNIQUE OR PATIENT ANATOMICAL CONDITIONS. DURING MANUFACTURING, SUTURE STRENGTH IS TESTED. IN ADDITION, SAMPLING OF FINISHED DEVICES IS DESTRUCTIVELY TESTED TO VERIFY THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE DEVICE. THE SUTURE MAY BREAK IF THE USER APPLIES TOO MUCH TENSION WHILE PULLING ON THE LIMB SUTURE. THE DEVICE MAY BECOME DIFFICULT TO REMOVE DUE TO: POSTERIOR CUFF PARTIALLY DEPLOYED IN FOOT, TANGLED SUTURE IF FULL STROKE OF PLUNGER WITHDRAWAL IS NOT COMPLETED, EDGING OF THE DEVICE THAT CAN CATCH THE ARTERIAL WALL, OR REMOVAL OF THE DEVICE BEFORE THE SUTURE RETRIEVAL. TISSUE CAUGHT IN THE FOOT (DUE TO ANATOMICAL CONDITIONS) CAN PREVENT IT FROM COMPLETELY RETRACTING AND CAN MAKE DEVICE WITHDRAWAL DIFFICULT. OTHER ANATOMICAL INFORMATION OR PATIENT MEDICAL HISTORY WAS NOT PROVIDED. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD FOR THIS LOT DID NOT PRODUCE ANY FINDINGS RELEVANT TO THIS REPORT. A QUERY OF THE COMPLAINT HANDLING DATABASE WAS PERFORMED AND THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCY.
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE DEVICE WAS DISCARDED. THE LOT NUMBER WAS PROVIDED. REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD IS FORTHCOMING. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ARTERIOTOMY CLOSURE OF THE RIGHT COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY WAS ATTEMPTED USING A PERCLOSE PROGLIDE DEVICE AFTER A DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE USING A 6F SHEATH. REPORTEDLY, DURING DEVICE RETRACTION, EVEN THOUGH THE FOOT WAS CLOSED COMPLETELY, RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS TO REMOVE THE DEVICE WERE UNSUCCESSFUL. A VASCULAR SURGEON WAS CALLED TO SURGICALLY REMOVE THE DEVICE, BUT THE DEVICE WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED BY INCREASING THE ANGLE OF THE DEVICE TO THE GROIN. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL INTERVENTION NECESSARY AND HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED BY THE DEVICE. IT WAS ALSO REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN EXPRESSED DISCOMFORT WHILE RETRACTING THE PLUNGER, HE STATED THAT IT FELT 'GRITTY'. THE SUTURE REPORTEDLY SNAPPED DURING PLUNGER RETRACTION, BUT THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO GRAB THE SUTURE AND TIE THE KNOT TO COMPLETE THE CLOSURE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN IS TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PERCLOSE PROGLIDE DEVICE. THOUGH REQUESTED, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 060156H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61 YR | Required Intervention | SHEATH: 6F |