FDA Adverse Event Injury Summary report: N

OT ULTRA2 METER

MDR report key: 2192385 · Received August 4, 2011

Report

Report Number
2939301-2011-06908
Event Type
Injury
Date Received
August 4, 2011
Date of Event
June 12, 2011
Report Date
July 15, 2011
Manufacturer
LIFESCAN INC.
Product Code
NBW
Adverse Event
Yes
Report Source
Manufacturer report
Reporter Location
IL, US
Reporter Occupation
PATIENT

Narratives

Additional Manufacturer Narrative · 1

LIFESCAN (LFS) HAS REQUESTED RETURN OF THE SUBJECT PRODUCT(S) FOR EVALUATION. IF THE PRODUCT(S) ARE RETURNED, LFS WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. 510(K) # IS K053529.

Description of Event or Problem · 1

ON (B)(6) 2011, THE LAY-USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) TO REPORT EXPERIENCING AN INACCURATE ERRATIC ISSUE WITH HIS ONE TOUCH ULTRA2 METER. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA) DOCUMENTATION. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT THE ALLEGED ISSUE WITH THE SUBJECT METER BEGAN ON AN UNSPECIFIED TIME ON (B)(6) 2011. THE PATIENT REPORTED BLOOD GLUCOSE RESULTS OF "180, 230 AND 150MG/DL" WITH THE SUBJECT METER, PERFORMED WITHIN 20 MINUTES OF EACH OTHER. BASED ON STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, THE CALCULATED DIFFERENCE OF THESE GLUCOSE RESULTS EXCEEDS THE EXPECTED VALUE OF <=20% AND/ OR <=20 MG/DL. THE PATIENT STATED THAT HE MANAGES HIS DIABETES WITH PILLS, DIET AND/OR EXERCISE, AND DUE TO THE ALLEGED ISSUE HE WAS TAKING AN ADDITIONAL HALF DOSE OF AMARYL. THE PATIENT CLAIMED THAT A FEW HOURS AFTER TAKING THE EXTRA DOSE OF MEDICATION, HE FELT FAINT, WEAK, LIGHTHEADED AND SWEATY. HE REPORTEDLY TESTED AGAIN WHILE EXHIBITING THOSE SYMPTOMS AND GOT MORE INACCURATE HIGH READINGS (HE COULD NOT REMEMBER VALUES). HE INFORMED THIS MSS, THAT HE ASSOCIATED THOSE SYMPTOMS TO A LOW GLUCOSE LEVEL, AND KNEW THE METER WAS INACCURATE. THE PATIENT STATED THAT HE WENT AHEAD AND SELF TREATED WITH ORANGE JUICE OR GLUCOSE TABLETS TO FEEL BETTER. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2011, AFTER GOING THRU THESE EVENTS SEVERAL TIMES, HE REALIZED HIS GLUCOSE MUST HAVE BEEN NORMAL AND WAS TREATING UNNECESSARILY WHICH WAS THEN DROPPING HIS GLUCOSE TOO LOW, AND SCHEDULED A DOCTOR'S APPOINTMENT FOR A CHECKUP. ACCORDING TO THE PATIENT HE WAS A TESTED WITH A CLINIC METER, BUT COULD NOT RECALL THE RESULT OBTAINED, AND NO MEDICATION ADJUSTMENTS WERE MADE OR NO FURTHER TREATMENT WAS NEEDED. DURING THE INITIAL CALL WITH CUSTOMER SERVICE, THE CCA NOTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS USING AN APPROVED SAMPLE SITE, APPROPRIATE TESTING TECHNIQUE AND THE UNIT OF MEASURE WAS SET CORRECTLY IN THE METER. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT CLAIMS HE OBTAINED AN INACCURATE HIGH READING ON THE SUBJECT METER, ADMINISTERED TREATMENT BASED ON THE ALLEGED RESULT, AND REPORTEDLY DEVELOPED SYMPTOMS SUGGESTIVE OF SEVERE HYPOGLYCEMIA AFTER THE ALLEGED METER ISSUE BEGAN.

Devices

Seq Brand Generic Product Code Manufacturer Model Lot UDI-DI
1 OT ULTRA2 METER GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT NBW LIFESCAN INC. 3089990

Patients

Seq Age Sex Outcome Treatment
1 35 YR Life Threatening| R