OT ULTRA2 METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2011-06576
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 28, 2011
- Report Date
- July 3, 2011
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NY, US
- Reporter Occupation
- PATIENT
Narratives
THE METER INVOLVED WITH THIS COMPLAINT HAS/HAVE BEEN RETURNED AND EVALUATED BY LIFESCAN PRODUCT ANALYSIS WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: THE METER HAS PASSED TESTING WITH NO FAULTS FOUND. IF LIFESCAN OBTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS COMPLAINT, A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, LIFESCAN CONSIDERS THIS MATTER CLOSED. 510K # IS K053529.
ON (B)(6) 2011, THE LAY USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) ALLEGING THAT HER ONETOUCH ULTRA2 METER WAS ENTERING THE SETUP MODE INSTEAD OF THE TESTING MODE. THE COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON THE CONVERSATION THE PATIENT HAD WITH THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA), SINCE THE PATIENT WAS UNABLE TO BE REACHED BY PHONE FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT SHE PURCHASED THE SUBJECT METER ON (B)(6) 2011 AND THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN AS SOON AS SHE ATTEMPTED TO USE IT. IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE PATIENT WAS ABLE TO TEST WITH THE SUBJECT METER BETWEEN WHEN SHE PURCHASED THE SUBJECT METER AND CONTACTED LFS. THE PATIENT INFORMED THE CCA THAT SHE MANAGES HER DIABETES WITH INSULIN; HOWEVER, IT IS NOT KNOWN IF THE PATIENT MADE ANY CHANGES TO HER USUAL DIABETES MANAGEMENT REGIMEN AS A RESULT OF THE ALLEGED ISSUE. THE DAY PRIOR TO PURCHASING THE SUBJECT METER, THE PATIENT CLAIMED SHE HAD JUST BEEN DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL AFTER BEING TREATED FOR HYPERGLYCEMIA. PRIOR TO BEING ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL, THE PATIENT CONFIRMED SHE WAS OBTAINING HIGH RESULTS WITH A DIFFERENT LFS DEVICE. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT CLAIMED AFTER THE ALLEGED ISSUE BEGAN AND AFTER BEING DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL (ON (B)(6) 2011), SHE WAS HOSPITALIZED AGAIN FOR THE SAME REASON. THE PATIENT DID NOT RECALL THE DATE SHE WAS DISCHARGED. AT THE TIME OF TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CCA NOTED THE ALLEGED ISSUE WAS RESOLVED WITH TRAINING. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT CLAIMS SHE WAS UNABLE TO TEST HER BLOOD GLUCOSE DUE TO THE REPORTED ISSUE AND REPORTEDLY WAS HOSPITALIZED FOR A SERIOUS INJURY AFTER THE ALLEGED METER ISSUE BEGAN.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT ULTRA2 METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN INC. |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60 YR | Hospitalization| R |