ECHELON*FLEX60 COMPACT ARTICULATING ENDOSCOPIC LINEAR CUTTER, 60 MM
Report
- Report Number
- 3005075853-2011-03042
- Event Type
- Malfunction
- Date Received
- July 27, 2011
- Date of Event
- July 5, 2011
- Report Date
- July 5, 2011
- Manufacturer
- ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
- Product Code
- GDW
- PMA / PMN Number
- K081146
- Removal / Correction Number
- NA
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- NV, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
(B)(4). INFORMATION IS UNAVAILABLE; DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.DEVICE NOT RETURNED. THE COMPLAINT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED BECAUSE NO DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR ANALYSIS. AS A LOT NUMBER WAS NOT RECEIVED, A DEVICE HISTORY REVIEW COULD NOT BE PERFORMED.
(B)(4). INFORMATION ANTICIPATED, BUT UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. ON WHAT TISSUE TYPE WAS THE DEVICE USED? VASCULAR. AT WHAT LOCATION ON THE TISSUE? SPLENIC HYLUM. ON WHICH FIRING(S) DID THIS EVENT OCCUR (1ST, 2ND, 12TH, ETC.)? 1ST. DURING WHICH STROKE DID THE EVENT OCCUR? 1ST. WHAT COLOR CARTRIDGE WAS BEING USED? WHITE. WHAT OTHER COLOR CARTRIDGES WERE USED BEFORE AND AFTER THIS EVENT? WHITE. WAS BUTTRESSING MATERIAL UTILIZED? NO. IF SO, WHICH PRODUCT? NA. WAS THE INSTRUMENT FIRED ACROSS OR NEAR AN EXISTING STAPLE LINE OR CLIP? NO. WERE ANY UNEXPECTED NOISES HEARD? NO. IF SO, WHEN? NA. WERE ANY OF THE FORCES HIGHER OR LOWER THAN EXPECTED (CLOSING, FIRING, OR OPENING)? NO. AFTER USE, DID EACH OF THE TRIGGERS AND BUTTONS AUTOMATICALLY RETURN TO THEIR ORIGINAL (PRE-FIRED) POSITIONS, WITHOUT INTERVENTION? NO. WAS THERE ANY DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE DEVICE FROM THE TISSUE? NO. IS THERE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION YOU WOULD LIKE TO SHARE ABOUT THIS DEVICE OR PROCEDURE? RELOAD WAS IMPROPERLY LOADED, NOT SNAPPED INTO PLACE. WHAT WERE THE PATIENT'S PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS? TRAUMA CASE. ACCORDING TO THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE WHO WAS PRESENT IN THE CASE (AT THE HEAD OF THE PATIENT). PATIENT HAD MULTIPLE INJURIES DUE TO TRAUMA. THE TECH LOADED THE DEVICE, IT WAS FIRED ON THE SPLENIC VEIN AND ARTERY AFTER LITTLE DISSECTION, A SMALL AMOUNT OF BLEEDING (100CC'S) OCCURRED. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND THE CARTRIDGE WAS IN THE PATIENT'S ABDOMEN. THE STAPLES WERE DEPLOYED BUT NOT IN TISSUE AND HAD POOR FORMATION, THE KNIFE HAD ADVANCED. THE DEVICE WAS SWISHED AND RELOADED UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE SALES REP AND NO ANOMALIES OCCURRED WITH ANY OTHER FIRINGS. PATIENT RECEIVED 4 UNITS OF PACKED RED BLOOD CELLS AND 2 FRESH FROZEN PLASMA DUE TO A SPLENIC LACERATION (UNRELATED TO THE DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED WITH THE DEVICE). THE TECH WAS RE-INSERVICED AS WELL AS ALL OTHER TECHS. THE SURGEON HAS BEEN USING THE DEVICE FOR A LONG TIME AND HAS BEEN INSERVICED. THE PATIENT IS RECOVERING WELL AND HAS BEEN DISCHARGED.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE WAS USED DURING A EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY WITH SPLENECTOMY PROCEDURE. THE DEVICE'S RELOAD WAS IMPROPERLY LOADED. THE SURGEON PLACED THE DEVICE ON THE SPLENIC HYLUM AND FIRED, SURGEON THOUGHT IT CUT BUT NOT STAPLE, HOWEVER WHEN RELEASED THE CARTRIDGE WAS EJECTED INTO THE PATIENT, BUT WAS REMOVED. FOR THE SECOND FIRING, IT WAS NOTICED THAT THE TECH DID NOT SNAP RELOAD INTO PLACE. AFTER ADVISING TECH TO SNAP IN, ALL SUBSEQUENT FIRINGS WERE NORMAL. THERE WAS A TEAR NOTICED IN THE SPLENIC HYLUM, THE SURGEON STAPLED ACROSS AND WAS STILL SOME OOZING. THE AREA WAS SUTURED AND SUBSEQUENT FIRINGS WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THE PATIENT LOST 100CC OF BLOOD. THERE WAS A TRANSFUSION GIVEN OF 4 UNITS OF PACKED RED BLOOD CELLS AND 2 FRESH FROZEN PLASMA. THE SURGEON STATED THIS WAS NOT DUE TO THE DEVICE INCIDENT. THE PATIENT HAD RECEIVED HEPARIN AT SOME POINT PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE AND THE SURGEON STATED THIS MAY HAVE ATTRIBUTED TO THE OOZING.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ECHELON*FLEX60 COMPACT ARTICULATING ENDOSCOPIC LINEAR CUTTER, 60 MM | STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE | GDW | ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. | UNK | UNK |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Required Intervention | (B)(4) |