OT ULTRA2 METER
Report
- Report Number
- 2939301-2011-06507
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 27, 2011
- Report Date
- June 29, 2011
- Manufacturer
- LIFESCAN INC.
- Product Code
- NBW
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- CA, US
- Reporter Occupation
- OTHER
Narratives
DEVICE EVALUATION: THE METER AND TEST STRIPS INVOLVED WITH THIS COMPLAINT HAVE BEEN RETURNED AND EVALUATED BY LIFESCAN PRODUCT ANALYSIS WITH THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: THE METER AND TEST STRIPS HAVE PASSED ALL TESTING WITH NO FAULTS FOUND. THE RETAIN TEST STRIPS ALSO PASSED ALL TESTING. A DHR (DEVICE HISTORY RECORD) WAS COMPLETED FOR THIS PRODUCT AND NO DEVIATIONS, NON-CONFORMANCES, OR REWORKS WERE OBSERVED. IF LIFESCAN OBTAINS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS COMPLAINT, A FOLLOW UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED. AT THIS TIME, LIFESCAN CONSIDERS THIS MATTER CLOSED.
LIFESCAN (LFS) HAS REQUESTED RETURN OF THE SUBJECT PRODUCT(S) FOR EVALUATION. IF THE PRODUCT(S) ARE RETURNED, LFS WILL EVALUATE IT/THEM AND INFORM FDA OF PRODUCT(S) THAT DO NOT PASS INSPECTION IN A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT. 510(K) # IS K053529.
ON (B)(6) 2011, THE LAY USER/PATIENT CONTACTED LIFESCAN (LFS) ALLEGING THAT HIS ONETOUCH ULTRA2 METER WAS READING INACCURATELY LOW COMPARED TO HOW HE FELT. THE FOLLOWING COMPLAINT WAS CLASSIFIED BASED ON DOCUMENTATION FROM THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA). THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT THE ALLEGED INACCURACY BEGAN ON AN UNKNOWN DATE AND TIME. THE PATIENT CLAIMED THAT ON (B)(6) 2011 HE OBTAINED ALLEGED LOW BLOOD GLUCOSE READINGS OF "233MG/DL" TAKEN AT 9:48AM, AND COMPARED THESE TO A "356MG/DL" RESULT FROM THE LAB TAKEN ON (B)(6) 2011 AT 9:55AM. THE PATIENT REPORTED HE MANAGES HIS DIABETES WITH INSULIN (SELF ADJUST). THE PATIENT REPORTED THAT NO CHANGES WERE MADE TO HIS DIABETES TREATMENT ROUTINE AS A RESPONSE TO THE ISSUE. THE PATIENT STATED THAT ON (B)(6) 2011 AS A RESULT OF THE ISSUE, HE WAS HOSPITALIZED FOR DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS. IV FLUIDS AND INSULIN WERE ADMINISTERED AS HCP TREATMENT. DURING TROUBLESHOOTING, THE CUSTOMER CARE ADVOCATE (CCA) CONFIRMED THAT THE SUBJECT METER WAS SET TO THE CORRECT UNIT OF MEASURE SETTING AND THAT THE TEST STRIPS WERE IN GOOD CONDITION AND STORED CORRECTLY. REPLACEMENT PRODUCTS WERE SENT TO THE PATIENT. THIS COMPLAINT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT REPORTEDLY DEVELOPED SYMPTOMS SUGGESTIVE OF A SERIOUS INJURY AFTER THE ALLEGED METER ISSUE BEGAN.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OT ULTRA2 METER | GLUCOSE MONITORING SYS/KIT | NBW | LIFESCAN INC. | 3111896 |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hospitalization| L| R |