PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM
Report
- Report Number
- 2024168-2011-05309
- Event Type
- Injury
- Date Received
- July 27, 2011
- Date of Event
- July 5, 2011
- Report Date
- July 9, 2011
- Manufacturer
- AV-TEMECULA-CT
- Product Code
- MGB
- PMA / PMN Number
- P960043
- Adverse Event
- Yes
- Product Problem
- Yes
- Report Source
- Manufacturer report
- Reporter Location
- FL, US
- Reporter Occupation
- HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Narratives
(B)(4). EVALUATION SUMMARY: ANALYSIS OF THE RETURNED COMPONENTS BODY OF THE DEVICE, HANDLE TO FOOT FUNCTION, GUIDE TUBE, NEEDLE GUIDE, BRIDGE, SUTURE BEARING, EXIT RAMP AND SHEATH WERE NORMAL, THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A PRODUCT QUALITY DEFICIENCY THAT WOULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED CUFF MISS. THE ANTERIOR CUFF WAS ENGAGED TO ANTERIOR NEEDLE TIP AND BOTH CUFFS WERE ATTACHED TO THE LINK. THE POSTERIOR CUFF WAS OUT OF THE POCKET AND THE POSTERIOR CUFF TABS WERE UNDISTURBED, INDICATING THAT A POSTERIOR CUFF MISS OCCURRED. THERE WAS NO NEEDLE STRIKE MARK ON THE POSTERIOR FOOT. DURING TESTING, THE PLUNGER WAS INSERTED TO TEST THE NEEDLE TRAJECTORY, NEEDLE DEPTH AND PUSH MANDREL TRAVEL AND THE RESULTS WERE ACCEPTABLE. THE NEEDLE TRAJECTORY OF EVERY DEVICE IS CHECKED DURING MANUFACTURING. THE MOST PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE POSTERIOR CUFF MISS IS NEEDLE DEFLECTION DURING PLUNGER DEPLOYMENT DUE TO INTERACTION WITH HUMAN TISSUE BECAUSE OF CHALLENGING ANATOMIES (E.G. HEAVY CALCIFIED ARTERIES, MORBIDLY OBESE PATIENTS, ETC.) OR FAILURE TO POSITION AND MAINTAIN THE DEVICE AT A 45-DEGREE ANGLE THROUGHOUT DEPLOYMENT. ALTHOUGH IT WAS REPORTED THAT A 10FR SHEATH WAS USED DURING INSERTION OF THE DEVICES, THIS WOULD NOT HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE REPORTED EXPERIENCE. A REVIEW OF THE FINISHED DEVICE LOT HISTORY RECORDS DID NOT REVEAL ANY RELEVANT NONCONFORMING MATERIAL RECORDS FOR THIS LOT THAT COULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THIS COMPLAINT.
(B)(4). DURING PROCESSING OF THIS COMPLAINT, ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE EVENT, PATIENT AND DEVICE INFORMATION. THE DEVICE IS EXPECTED TO BE RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. IT HAS NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED WITH ALL RELEVANT INFORMATION. THE SECOND PROGLIDE DEVICE IS BEING REPORTED UNDER A SEPARATE MEDWATCH REPORT NUMBER.
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED PLACEMENT OF THE PROGLIDE SUTURE OF TWO PROGLIDE DEVICES USING THE PRE-CLOSE TECHNIQUE PRIOR TO A INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURE IN THE COMMON FEMORAL ARTERY. REPORTEDLY, FOUR PROGLIDE DEVICES WERE PLACE; HOWEVER, TWO OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICES EXPERIENCED CUFF MISSES. HEMOSTASIS WAS ACHIEVED WITH THE REMAINING TWO PROGLIDE DEVICES. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. A 10FR SHEATH WAS USED DURING INSERTION OF THE DEVICES. THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE ENTIRE PROCEDURE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE PROGLIDE DEVICE. THOUGH REQUESTED, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED.
Devices
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Product Code | Manufacturer | Model | Lot | UDI-DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PERCLOSE PROGLIDE 6F SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE (SMC) SYSTEM | SUTURE MEDIATED CLOSURE | MGB | AV-TEMECULA-CT | 040356H |
Patients
| Seq | Age | Sex | Outcome | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 YR | Required Intervention | HEPARINSHEATH: 10F |